Literature DB >> 32556270

Mating Competitiveness of Transgenic Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Males Against Wild-Type Males Reared Under Simulated Field Conditions.

David S Kang1, Joanne M Cunningham1, Diane D Lovin1, Dave D Chadee2, David W Severson1,3,2.   

Abstract

Efforts directed at genetic modification of mosquitoes for population control or replacement are highly dependent on the initial mating success of transgenic male mosquitoes following their release into natural populations. Adult mosquito phenotypes are influenced by the environmental conditions experienced as larvae. Semifield studies conducted to date have not taken that under consideration when testing male mating fitness, and have compared mating success of males reared under identical environmental conditions. We performed pairwise mating challenges between males from a genetically modified laboratory strain (BF2) versus males from a recent Trinidad field isolate of Aedes aegypti (L.), a major vector of multiple arboviruses. We utilized larval density and nutrition to simulate environmental stress experienced by the Trinidad males and females. Our results indicated that environmental stress during larval development negatively influenced the competitiveness and reproductive success of males from the Trinidad population when paired with optimum reared BF2 males. Small (0.027 m3) and large (0.216 m3) trials were conducted wherein stressed or optimum Trinidad males competed with optimum BF2 males for mating with stressed Trinidad females. When competing with stress reared Trinidad males, optimum reared BF2 males were predominant in matings with stress reared Trinidad females, and large proportions of these females mated with males of both strains. When competing with optimum reared Trinidad males, no difference in mating success was observed between them and BF2 males, and frequencies of multiple matings were low. Our results indicate that future mating competition studies should incorporate appropriate environmental conditions when designing mating fitness trials of genetically modified males.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  competition; fitness; genetically modified organism; transgenic

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32556270      PMCID: PMC7899268          DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjaa111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  41 in total

1.  Assessing fitness costs for transgenic Aedes aegypti expressing the GFP marker and transposase genes.

Authors:  Nic Irvin; Mark S Hoddle; David A O'Brochta; Bryan Carey; Peter W Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rapid, simple alkaline extraction of human genomic DNA from whole blood, buccal epithelial cells, semen and forensic stains for PCR.

Authors:  L Rudbeck; J Dissing
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Culturing and egg collection of Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Anthony Clemons; Akio Mori; Morgan Haugen; David W Severson; Molly Duman-Scheel
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2010-10-01

4.  Effects of inbreeding and genetic modification on Aedes aegypti larval competition and adult energy reserves.

Authors:  Constantianus Jm Koenraadt; Matthias Kormaksson; Laura C Harrington
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Zika virus: History, emergence, biology, and prospects for control.

Authors:  Scott C Weaver; Federico Costa; Mariano A Garcia-Blanco; Albert I Ko; Guilherme S Ribeiro; George Saade; Pei-Yong Shi; Nikos Vasilakis
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.970

6.  The size of emerging and host-seeking Aedes aegypti and the relation of size to blood-feeding success in the field.

Authors:  R S Nasci
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 0.917

7.  The global distribution and burden of dengue.

Authors:  Samir Bhatt; Peter W Gething; Oliver J Brady; Jane P Messina; Andrew W Farlow; Catherine L Moyes; John M Drake; John S Brownstein; Anne G Hoen; Osman Sankoh; Monica F Myers; Dylan B George; Thomas Jaenisch; G R William Wint; Cameron P Simmons; Thomas W Scott; Jeremy J Farrar; Simon I Hay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Temperature, larval diet, and density effects on development rate and survival of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Jannelle Couret; Ellen Dotson; Mark Q Benedict
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Antiviral Hammerhead Ribozymes Are Effective for Developing Transgenic Suppression of Chikungunya Virus in Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes.

Authors:  Priya Mishra; Colleen Furey; Velmurugan Balaraman; Malcolm J Fraser
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes.

Authors:  Kyros Kyrou; Andrew M Hammond; Roberto Galizi; Nace Kranjc; Austin Burt; Andrea K Beaghton; Tony Nolan; Andrea Crisanti
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 54.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.