Literature DB >> 22697494

The Acinetobacter regulatory UmuDAb protein cleaves in response to DNA damage with chimeric LexA/UmuD characteristics.

Janelle M Hare1, Sabal Adhikari, Kasandra V Lambert, Alexander E Hare, Alison N Grice.   

Abstract

In the DNA damage response of most bacteria, UmuD forms part of the error-prone (UmuD'(2) )C polymerase V and is activated for this function by self-cleavage after DNA damage. However, the umuD homolog (umuDAb) present throughout the Acinetobacter genus encodes an extra N-terminal region, and in Acinetobacter baylyi, regulates transcription of DNA damage-induced genes. UmuDAb expressed in cells was correspondingly larger (24 kDa) than the Escherichia coli UmuD (15 kDa). DNA damage from mitomycin C or UV exposure caused UmuDAb cleavage in both E. coli wild-type and ΔumuD cells on a timescale resembling UmuD, but did not require UmuD. Like the self-cleaving serine proteases LexA and UmuD, UmuDAb required RecA for cleavage. This cleavage produced a UmuDAb' fragment of a size consistent with the predicted cleavage site of Ala83-Gly84. Site-directed mutations at Ala83 abolished cleavage, as did mutations at either the Ser119 or Lys156 predicted enzymatic residues. Co-expression of the cleavage site mutant and an enzymatic mutant did not allow cleavage, demonstrating a strictly intramolecular mechanism of cleavage that more closely resembles the LexA-type repressors than UmuD. These data show that UmuDAb undergoes a post-translational, LexA-like cleavage event after DNA damage, possibly to achieve its regulatory action.
© 2012 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22697494      PMCID: PMC3475745          DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02618.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  35 in total

1.  A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  T Opperman; S Murli; B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A constitutively expressed, truncated umuDC operon regulates the recA-dependent DNA damage induction of a gene in Acinetobacter baylyi strain ADP1.

Authors:  Janelle M Hare; Sara N Perkins; Leslie A Gregg-Jolly
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Isolation of DNA damage-inducible promoters in Escherichia coli: regulation of polB (dinA), dinG, and dinH by LexA repressor.

Authors:  L K Lewis; M E Jenkins; D W Mount
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Intermolecular cleavage by UmuD-like mutagenesis proteins.

Authors:  J P McDonald; E G Frank; A S Levine; R Woodgate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The SOS regulatory system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J W Little; D W Mount
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  UmuD'(2)C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V.

Authors:  M Tang; X Shen; E G Frank; M O'Donnell; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dominant mutations (lex) in Escherichia coli K-12 which affect radiation sensitivity and frequency of ultraviolet lght-induced mutations.

Authors:  D W Mount; K B Low; S J Edmiston
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Specific RecA amino acid changes affect RecA-UmuD'C interaction.

Authors:  S Sommer; F Boudsocq; R Devoret; A Bailone
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  UmuD mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA.

Authors:  S E Burckhardt; R Woodgate; R H Scheuermann; H Echols
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  H Shinagawa; H Iwasaki; T Kato; A Nakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  Identification of a DNA-damage-inducible regulon in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Jesús Aranda; Margarita Poza; Miguel Shingu-Vázquez; Pilar Cortés; John D Boyce; Ben Adler; Jordi Barbé; Germán Bou
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Reduced Mutation Rate and Increased Transformability of Transposon-Free Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1-ISx.

Authors:  Gabriel A Suárez; Brian A Renda; Aurko Dasgupta; Jeffrey E Barrick
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Homodimerization and heterodimerization requirements of Acinetobacter baumannii SOS response coregulators UmuDAb and DdrR revealed by two-hybrid analyses.

Authors:  Deborah Cook; Jordan Carrington; Kevin Johnson; Janelle Hare
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Class 1 integrons are low-cost structures in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Yohann Lacotte; Marie-Cécile Ploy; Sophie Raherison
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  The Small DdrR Protein Directly Interacts with the UmuDAb Regulator of the Mutagenic DNA Damage Response in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Anja Pavlin; Gregor Bajc; Nadine Fornelos; Douglas F Browning; Matej Butala
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.476

6.  Antibiotic resistance acquired through a DNA damage-inducible response in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Matthew D Norton; Allison J Spilkia; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Multiple strategies for translesion synthesis in bacteria.

Authors:  Paul J Ippoliti; Nicholas A Delateur; Kathryn M Jones; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  UmuDAb: An Error-Prone Polymerase Accessory Homolog Whose N-Terminal Domain Is Required for Repression of DNA Damage Inducible Gene Expression in Acinetobacter baylyi.

Authors:  Travis A Witkowski; Alison N Grice; DeAnna B Stinnett; Whitney K Wells; Megan A Peterson; Janelle M Hare
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A corepressor participates in LexA-independent regulation of error-prone polymerases in Acinetobacter.

Authors:  Megan A Peterson; Alison N Grice; Janelle M Hare
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Prophage induction and differential RecA and UmuDAb transcriptome regulation in the DNA damage responses of Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter baylyi.

Authors:  Janelle M Hare; Joshua C Ferrell; Travis A Witkowski; Alison N Grice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.