Literature DB >> 15468186

Rosiglitazone versus placebo for men with prostate carcinoma and a rising serum prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy.

Matthew R Smith1, Judith Manola, Donald S Kaufman, Daniel George, William K Oh, Elisabetta Mueller, Susan Slovin, Bruce Spiegelman, Eric Small, Philip W Kantoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the biologic activity of rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist that has been approved to treat type 2 diabetes, in men with recurrent prostate carcinoma using change in prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) as the primary outcome variable.
METHODS: Men with histologically confirmed prostate carcinoma, no recent hormone therapy, a rising serum PSA level after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy, and no radiographic evidence of metastases were assigned randomly to receive either oral rosiglitazone (4 mg twice daily) or placebo. The treatment was continued until the men developed disease progression or adverse effects. A positive outcome was defined as a posttreatment PSADT > 150% the baseline PSADT and no new metastases.
RESULTS: One hundred six men were enrolled. The median treatment duration was 315 days for men in the placebo group and 338 days for men in the rosiglitazone group (P = 0.28). Forty percent of men in the in the placebo group and 38% of men in the rosiglitazone group had a posttreatment PSADT > 150% of the baseline PSADT and no new metastases (P = 1.00). In exploratory analyses, the rate of a positive outcome remained higher than expected in the placebo group, even when a positive outcome was redefined using more stringent criteria. The time to disease progression was similar between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Rosiglitazone did not increase PSADT or prolong the time to disease progression more than placebo in men with a rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy. The unexpected discordance between baseline and posttreatment PSADT in the placebo group reinforced the importance of randomized controlled trials in this setting. (c) 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15468186     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  45 in total

Review 1.  The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in carcinogenesis and chemoprevention.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Peters; Yatrik M Shah; Frank J Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Exploration and Development of PPAR Modulators in Health and Disease: An Update of Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Hong Sheng Cheng; Wei Ren Tan; Zun Siong Low; Charlie Marvalim; Justin Yin Hao Lee; Nguan Soon Tan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  A non-comparative randomized phase II study of 2 doses of ATN-224, a copper/zinc superoxide dismutase inhibitor, in patients with biochemically recurrent hormone-naïve prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jianqing Lin; Marianna Zahurak; Tomasz M Beer; Charles J Ryan; George Wilding; Paul Mathew; Michael Morris; Jennifer A Callahan; Gilad Gordon; Steven D Reich; Michael A Carducci; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma regulates E-cadherin expression and inhibits growth and invasion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Annicotte; Irena Iankova; Stéphanie Miard; Vanessa Fritz; David Sarruf; Anna Abella; Marie-Laurence Berthe; Danièle Noël; Arnaud Pillon; François Iborra; Pierre Dubus; Thierry Maudelonde; Stéphane Culine; Lluis Fajas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  A pilot phase II Study of digoxin in patients with recurrent prostate cancer as evident by a rising PSA.

Authors:  Jianqing Lin; Tingting Zhan; Danielle Duffy; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Deborah Kilpatrick; Edouard J Trabulsi; Costas D Lallas; Inna Chervoneva; Kimberly Limentani; Brooke Kennedy; Sarah Kessler; Leonard Gomella; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Michael A Carducci; Thomas Force; Wm Kevin Kelly
Journal:  Am J Cancer Ther Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-07

6.  Noncanonical agonist PPARγ ligands modulate the response to DNA damage and sensitize cancer cells to cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Melin J Khandekar; Alexander S Banks; Dina Laznik-Bogoslavski; James P White; Jang Hyun Choi; Lawrence Kazak; James C Lo; Paul Cohen; Kwok-Kin Wong; Theodore M Kamenecka; Patrick R Griffin; Bruce M Spiegelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Paracrine and endocrine effects of adipose tissue on cancer development and progression.

Authors:  Jiyoung Park; David M Euhus; Philipp E Scherer
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Anticancer Role of PPARgamma Agonists in Hematological Malignancies Found in the Vasculature, Marrow, and Eyes.

Authors:  P J Simpson-Haidaris; S J Pollock; S Ramon; N Guo; C F Woeller; S E Feldon; R P Phipps
Journal:  PPAR Res       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Synergy between PPARgamma ligands and platinum-based drugs in cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Girnun; Elnaz Naseri; Scott B Vafai; Lishu Qu; Jeffrey D Szwaya; Roderick Bronson; John A Alberta; Bruce M Spiegelman
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  Obesity-driven inflammation and cancer risk: role of myeloid derived suppressor cells and alternately activated macrophages.

Authors:  Derick Okwan-Duodu; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Otis W Brawley; Roberto Diaz
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.