Literature DB >> 20877485

Defining the Optimal Selenium Dose for Prostate Cancer Risk Reduction: Insights from the U-Shaped Relationship between Selenium Status, DNA Damage, and Apoptosis.

Emily C Chiang1, Shuren Shen, Seema S Kengeri, Huiping Xu, Gerald F Combs, J Steven Morris, David G Bostwick, David J Waters.   

Abstract

Our work in dogs has revealed a U-shaped dose response between selenium status and prostatic DNA damage that remarkably parallels the relationship between dietary selenium and prostate cancer risk in men, suggesting that more selenium is not necessarily better. Herein, we extend this canine work to show that the selenium dose that minimizes prostatic DNA damage also maximizes apoptosis-a cancer-suppressing death switch used by prostatic epithelial cells. These provocative findings suggest a new line of thinking about how selenium can reduce cancer risk. Mid-range selenium status (.67-.92 ppm in toenails) favors a process we call "homeostatic housecleaning"-an upregulated apoptosis that preferentially purges damaged prostatic cells. Also, the U-shaped relationship provides valuable insight into stratifying individuals as selenium-responsive or selenium-refractory, based upon the likelihood of reducing their cancer risk by additional selenium. By studying elderly dogs, the only non-human animal model of spontaneous prostate cancer, we have established a robust experimental approach bridging the gap between laboratory and human studies that can help to define the optimal doses of cancer preventives for large-scale human trials. Moreover, our observations bring much needed clarity to the null results of the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) and set a new research priority: testing whether men with low, suboptimal selenium levels less than 0.8 ppm in toenails can achieve cancer risk reduction through daily supplementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer prevention; dietary supplements; dog; non-linear; personalized medicine

Year:  2009        PMID: 20877485      PMCID: PMC2939616          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.09-036.Chiang

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  64 in total

1.  Prostate cancer risk and DNA damage: translational significance of selenium supplementation in a canine model.

Authors:  David J Waters; Shuren Shen; Lawrence T Glickman; Dawn M Cooley; David G Bostwick; Junqi Qian; Gerald F Combs; J Steven Morris
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Manganese superoxide dismutase polymorphism, prediagnostic antioxidant status, and risk of clinical significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Haojie Li; Philip W Kantoff; Edward Giovannucci; Michael F Leitzmann; J Michael Gaziano; Meir J Stampfer; Jing Ma
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Low micronutrient intake may accelerate the degenerative diseases of aging through allocation of scarce micronutrients by triage.

Authors:  Bruce N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The changing selenium status of New Zealand residents.

Authors:  C D Thomson; M F Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Serum selenium levels and all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality among US adults.

Authors:  Joachim Bleys; Ana Navas-Acien; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-25

6.  DNA stability and serum selenium levels in a high-risk group for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nishi Karunasinghe; Jacqueline Ryan; John Tuckey; Jonathan Masters; Michael Jamieson; Larry C Clarke; James R Marshall; Lynnette R Ferguson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Serum selenium and subsequent risk of cancer among Finnish men and women.

Authors:  P Knekt; A Aromaa; J Maatela; G Alfthan; R K Aaran; M Hakama; T Hakulinen; R Peto; L Teppo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-05-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Selenoproteins and human health: insights from epidemiological data.

Authors:  Margaret P Rayman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-03-25

9.  Selenomethionine regulation of p53 by a ref1-dependent redox mechanism.

Authors:  Young R Seo; Mark R Kelley; Martin L Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Superior in vivo inhibitory efficacy of methylseleninic acid against human prostate cancer over selenomethionine or selenite.

Authors:  Guang-xun Li; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Zhe Wang; Hongbo Hu; Joshua D Liao; Jennifer C Watts; Gerald F Combs; Junxuan Lü
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.944

View more
  21 in total

1.  Variants of glutathione s-transferase pi 1 exhibit differential enzymatic activity and inhibition by heavy metals.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Goodrich; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Selenium and prostate cancer: the puzzle isn't finished yet.

Authors:  Erin L Richman; June M Chan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Baseline selenium status and effects of selenium and vitamin e supplementation on prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Alan R Kristal; Amy K Darke; J Steven Morris; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; Ian M Thompson; Frank L Meyskens; Gary E Goodman; Lori M Minasian; Howard L Parnes; Scott M Lippman; Eric A Klein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Devising a new dialogue for nutrition science: how life course perspective, U-shaped thinking, whole organism thinking, and language precision contribute to our understanding of biological heterogeneity and forge a fresh advance toward precision medicine.

Authors:  David J Waters
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Protective Roles of N-acetyl Cysteine and/or Taurine against Sumatriptan-Induced Hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  Javad Khalili Fard; Hossein Hamzeiy; Mohammadreza Sattari; Mohammad Ali Eghbal
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2016-12-22

7.  A randomized phase II study of pomegranate extract for men with rising PSA following initial therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  C J Paller; X Ye; P J Wozniak; B K Gillespie; P R Sieber; R H Greengold; B R Stockton; B L Hertzman; M D Efros; R P Roper; H R Liker; M A Carducci
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Selenium supplementation and prostate cancer mortality.

Authors:  Stacey A Kenfield; Erin L Van Blarigan; Natalie DuPre; Meir J Stampfer; Edward L Giovannucci; June M Chan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Does a role for selenium in DNA damage repair explain apparent controversies in its use in chemoprevention?

Authors:  Soumen Bera; Viviana De Rosa; Walid Rachidi; Alan M Diamond
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  A Perspective on Prostate Carcinogenesis and Chemoprevention.

Authors:  Maarten C Bosland; Nur Ozten; Jillian N Eskra; Abeer M Mahmoud
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2015-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.