Literature DB >> 22687195

Prospective study of functional bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic malignancies.

Yun Liang1, Mark Bydder, Catheryn M Yashar, Brent S Rose, Mariel Cornell, Carl K Hoh, Joshua D Lawson, John Einck, Cheryl Saenz, Paul Fanta, Arno J Mundt, Graeme M Bydder, Loren K Mell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can reduce radiation dose to functional bone marrow (BM) in patients with pelvic malignancies (phase IA) and estimate the clinical feasibility and acute toxicity associated with this technique (phase IB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We enrolled 31 subjects (19 with gynecologic cancer and 12 with anal cancer) in an institutional review board-approved prospective trial (6 in the pilot study, 10 in phase IA, and 15 in phase IB). The mean age was 52 years; 8 of 31 patients (26%) were men. Twenty-one subjects completed (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) simulation and magnetic resonance imaging by use of quantitative IDEAL (IDEAL IQ; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). The PET/CT and IDEAL IQ were registered, and BM subvolumes were segmented above the mean standardized uptake value and below the mean fat fraction within the pelvis and lumbar spine; their intersection was designated as functional BM for IMRT planning. Functional BM-sparing vs total BM-sparing IMRT plans were compared in 12 subjects; 10 were treated with functional BM-sparing pelvic IMRT per protocol.
RESULTS: In gynecologic cancer patients, the mean functional BM V(10) (volume receiving ≥10 Gy) and V(20) (volume receiving ≥20 Gy) were 85% vs 94% (P<.0001) and 70% vs 82% (P<.0001), respectively, for functional BM-sparing IMRT vs total BM-sparing IMRT. In anal cancer patients, the corresponding values were 75% vs 77% (P=.06) and 62% vs 67% (P=.002), respectively. Of 10 subjects treated with functional BM-sparing pelvic IMRT, 3 (30%) had acute grade 3 hematologic toxicity or greater.
CONCLUSIONS: IMRT can reduce dose to BM subregions identified by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT and IDEAL IQ. The efficacy of BM-sparing IMRT is being tested in a phase II trial.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22687195     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  33 in total

1.  Dosimetric predictors of acute haematological toxicity in oesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jie Lee; Jhen-Bin Lin; Fang-Ju Sun; Kuo-Wei Lu; Chou-Hsien Lee; Yu-Jen Chen; Wen-Chien Huang; Hung-Chang Liu; Meng-Hao Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Impact of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on the rate of bowel obstruction in gynecologic malignancy.

Authors:  Karin K Shih; Carla Hajj; Marisa Kollmeier; Melissa K Frey; Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy: Present and future.

Authors:  Ana Fernandez-Ots; Juanita Crook
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-03

4.  Mapping Bone Marrow Response in the Vertebral Column by Positron Emission Tomography Following Radiotherapy and Erlotinib Therapy of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Azadeh Abravan; Hanne Astrid Eide; Ayca Muftuler Løndalen; Åslaug Helland; Eirik Malinen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Water-fat MRI for assessing changes in bone marrow composition due to radiation and chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer patients.

Authors:  Patrick J Bolan; Luke Arentsen; Thanasak Sueblinvong; Yan Zhang; Steen Moeller; Jori S Carter; Levi S Downs; Rahel Ghebre; Douglas Yee; Jerry Froelich; Susanta Hui
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Radiotherapy dose escalation with concurrent chemotherapy in locally advanced cervix cancer is feasible.

Authors:  M W Hegazy; R I Mahmood; I A Al-Badawi; B Moftah; H AlHusaini
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Image-Guided Adapted Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander J Lin; Elizabeth Kidd; Farrokh Dehdashti; Barry A Siegel; Sasa Mutic; Premal H Thaker; Leslie S Massad; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Stephanie Markovina; Julie Schwarz; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Fat composition changes in bone marrow during chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ruben Carmona; Jakub Pritz; Mark Bydder; Sachin Gulaya; He Zhu; Casey W Williamson; Christian S Welch; Florin Vaida; Graeme Bydder; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Presence of cerebral microbleeds is associated with worse executive function in pediatric brain tumor survivors.

Authors:  Erika Roddy; Katherine Sear; Erin Felton; Benita Tamrazi; Karen Gauvain; Joseph Torkildson; Benedict Del Buono; David Samuel; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Josephine Chen; Robert E Goldsby; Anuradha Banerjee; Janine M Lupo; Annette M Molinaro; Heather J Fullerton; Sabine Mueller
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Uptake and outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for uterine cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Israel Deutsch; Elizabeth T Wilde; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Sharyn N Lewin; Zainab Siddiq; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.