Literature DB >> 16506049

Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer.

Felix K-H Chun1, Markus Graefen, Mario Zacharias, Alexander Haese, Thomas Steuber, Thorsten Schlomm, Jochen Walz, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Hartwig Huland.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy remains the mainstay for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Long-term follow-up data showed excellent cancer control rates in several prostatectomy series. We report biochemical recurrence (BCR) outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in a European single center series of patients treated over a 13-year period. Between 1992 and 06/2005, 4,277 consecutive men underwent a RRP at the University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Germany. Kaplan-Meier probabilities of BCR-free survival were determined for those patients with complete preoperative data, postoperative data, and follow-up information. Uni-and multivariate Cox regression models addressed PSA recurrence, defined as a PSA level > or = 0.1 ng/ml. Overall, BCR-free survival ranged between 84, 70 and 61% for 2, 5, and 8 years, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses, except for age and type of nerve-sparing technique, all traditional clinical and pathological variables represented statistically independent predictors of PSA recurrence-free survival (all P < or = 0.001). In organ-confined disease, the 10-year recurrence free survival rate was 80 and 30% in non-organ-confined cancers. Our findings confirm excellent long-term biochemical cancer-control outcomes after RRP. High grade prostate cancer at final pathology and seminal vesicle invasion proved to be the strongest risk factors of BCR after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16506049     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-006-0058-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  24 in total

1.  Prospective validation of an algorithm with systematic sextant biopsy to predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan Conrad; Markus Graefen; Uwe Pichlmeier; Rolf-Peter Henke; Andreas Erbersdobler; Peter G Hammerer; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Validation of a nomogram for prediction of side specific extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Andreas Erbersdobler; Felix K-H Chun; Thorsten Schlom; Paul Perrotte; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  [Development of tumor selection based on pathological stage in clinically localized prostate carcinoma].

Authors:  J Noldus; M Graefen; P Hammerer; R P Henke; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Systematic sextant biopsies improve preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  S Conrad; M Graefen; U Pichlmeier; R P Henke; P G Hammerer; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Gerald W Hull; Farhang Rabbani; Farhat Abbas; Thomas M Wheeler; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Stage migration in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Noldus; M Graefen; A Haese; R P Henke; P Hammerer; H Huland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M Graefen; A Haese; U Pichlmeier; P G Hammerer; J Noldus; K Butz; A Erbersdobler; R P Henke; U Michl; S Fernandez; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Zincke; J E Oesterling; M L Blute; E J Bergstralh; R P Myers; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care.

Authors:  Gencay Hatiboglu; Dogu Teber; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  [Seminal vesicle sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].

Authors:  S Schäfers; P de Geeter; H Löhmer; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4. 

Authors:  Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  SPOP mutations in prostate cancer across demographically diverse patient cohorts.

Authors:  Mirjam Blattner; Daniel J Lee; Catherine O'Reilly; Kyung Park; Theresa Y MacDonald; Francesca Khani; Kevin R Turner; Ya-Lin Chiu; Peter J Wild; Igor Dolgalev; Adriana Heguy; Andrea Sboner; Sinan Ramazangolu; Haley Hieronymus; Charles Sawyers; Ashutosh K Tewari; Holger Moch; Ghil Suk Yoon; Yong Chul Known; Ove Andrén; Katja Fall; Francecsa Demichelis; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Brian D Robinson; Christopher E Barbieri; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 6.  Function-preserving surgery for urologic cancer.

Authors:  Kenichi Tobisu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.

Authors:  Wan Song; Dong Hyeon Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi; Jong Wook Kim; SangChul Lee; Seok-Soo Byun; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Jin Seon Cho; Hanjong Ahn; Seong Soo Jeon
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Surgery for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan Schmitges; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jochen Walz; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-08

Review 9.  [pT3R1 prostate cancer : Immediate or delayed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy?].

Authors:  D Bottke; T Wiegel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Quality of life two years after radical prostatectomy, prostate brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy for clinically localised prostate cancer: the Catalan Institute of Oncology/Bellvitge Hospital experience.

Authors:  F Guedea; M Ferrer; J Pera; F Aguiló; A Boladeras; J F Suárez; O Cunillera; F Ferrer; Y Pardo; E Martínez; M Ventura
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.