Literature DB >> 22682016

Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Comparison of an advanced, high-resolution and a standard sequence.

Geraint Morton1, Masaki Ishida, Andreas Schuster, Shazia Hussain, Tobias Schaeffter, Amedeo Chiribiri, Eike Nagel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technical advances in perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), particularly accelerated data acquisition methods, allow myocardial perfusion imaging with unprecedented spatial resolution. However, it is not clear how implementation of these recent advances affects perfusion image quality, signal and contrast to noise ratios (SNR & CNR) and the occurrence of important artefacts in routine clinical imaging. The objective of this study was therefore to compare a standard and an advanced, high-resolution perfusion sequence.
METHODS: A standard ultrafast gradient echo perfusion sequence (st-GrE) was compared with an advanced kt-accelerated steady state free precession sequence (ktBLAST-SSFP) at 1.5 T in healthy volunteers (n = 16) and in patients (n = 32) with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Volunteers were imaged with both sequences at rest and patients underwent stress and rest imaging with either st-GrE or ktBLAST-SSFP prior to X-ray coronary angiography.A blinded expert scored image quality and respiratory artefact severity and also classified patients for the presence of CAD. The extent, transmurality and duration of dark rim artefacts (DRA) as well as signal to noise (SNR) and contrast to noise (CNR) were quantified.
RESULTS: In normal hearts ktBLAST-SSFP imaging resulted in significantly improved image quality (p = 0.003), SNR (21.0 ± 6.7 vs. 18.8 ± 6.6; p = 0.009), CNR (15.4 ± 6.1 vs. 14.0 ± 6.0; p = 0.034) and a reduced extent (p = <0.0001) and transmurality (p = 0.0001) of DRA. In patients ktBLAST-SSFP imaging resulted in significantly improved image quality (p = 0.012), and a reduced extent (p = <0.0001), duration (p = 0.004) and transmurality (p = <0.0001) of DRA. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CAD against X-ray angiography was comparable with both sequences. There was a non-significant trend towards increased respiratory artefacts with ktBLAST-SSFP in both patients and volunteers.
CONCLUSIONS: Advanced high resolution perfusion CMR using a k-t-accelerated SSFP technique results in significantly improved image quality, SNR and CNR and a reduction in the extent and transmurality of DRA compared to a standard sequence. These findings support the use of advanced perfusion sequences for clinical perfusion imaging however further studies exploring whether this results in improved diagnostic accuracy are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22682016      PMCID: PMC3403962          DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  26 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Quantitative magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion analysis: inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  O M Mühling; M E Dickson; A Zenovich; Y Huang; B V Wilson; R F Wilson; I S Anand; R T Seethamraju; M Jerosch-Herold; N M Wilke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP.

Authors:  Wolfgang Günther Schreiber; Melanie Schmitt; Peter Kalden; Oliver Klaus Mohrs; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Effects of missing dynamic images on myocardial perfusion reserve index calculation: comparison between an every heartbeat and an alternate heartbeat acquisition.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Sven Plein; John P Ridgway; Marcel Breeuwer; David Higgins; Gerhard Schuler; Mohan Sivananthan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Assessment of regional left ventricular function: accuracy and reproducibility of positioning standard short-axis sections in cardiac MR imaging.

Authors:  Daniel R Messroghli; Gavin J Bainbridge; Khaled Alfakih; Tim R Jones; Sven Plein; John P Ridgway; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies.

Authors:  E V R Di Bella; D L Parker; A J Sinusas
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Comparison of hybrid echo-planar imaging and FLASH myocardial perfusion cardiovascular MR imaging.

Authors:  Andrew G Elkington; Peter D Gatehouse; Timothy M Cannell; James C Moon; Sanjay K Prasad; David N Firmin; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography.

Authors:  J Schwitter; D Nanz; S Kneifel; K Bertschinger; M Büchi; P R Knüsel; B Marincek; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Multislice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison of saturation recovery (SR)-TrueFISP-two-dimensional (2D) and SR-TurboFLASH-2D pulse sequences.

Authors:  Michael Fenchel; Uwe Helber; Orlando P Simonetti; Norbert I Stauder; Ulrich Kramer; Co-Nghi Nguyen; J Paul Finn; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Variability in quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis.

Authors:  K Bratis; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Use of bio-informatics assessment schema (BIAS) to improve diagnosis and prognosis of myocardial perfusion data: results from the NHLBI-sponsored women's ischemia syndrome evaluation (WISE).

Authors:  Mark Doyle; Gerald M Pohost; C Noel Bairey Merz; Leslee J Shaw; George Sopko; William J Rogers; Barry L Sharaf; Carl J Pepine; Diane V Thompson; Geetha Rayarao; Lindsey Tauxe; Sheryl F Kelsey; Robert W W Biederman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-10

Review 4.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  K Bratis; I Mahmoud; A Chiribiri; E Nagel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Cardiac MRI assessment of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2014-05

Review 6.  Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Alice C Yang; Madison Kretzler; Sonja Sudarski; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Feasibility of high-resolution quantitative perfusion analysis in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Eva Sammut; Niloufar Zarinabad; Roman Wesolowski; Geraint Morton; Zhong Chen; Manav Sohal; Gerry Carr-White; Reza Razavi; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2012.

Authors:  Dudley J Pennell; A John Baksi; John Paul Carpenter; David N Firmin; Philip J Kilner; Raad H Mohiaddin; Sanjay K Prasad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Germany.

Authors:  Julia Boldt; Alexander W Leber; Klaus Bonaventura; Christian Sohns; Martin Stula; Alexander Huppertz; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Marc Dorenkamp
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Three-dimensional balanced steady state free precession myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3T using dual-source parallel RF transmission: initial experience.

Authors:  Roy Jogiya; Andreas Schuster; Arshad Zaman; Manish Motwani; Marc Kouwenhoven; Eike Nagel; Sebastian Kozerke; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.