Literature DB >> 22679557

Initiation of DNA double strand break repair: signaling and single-stranded resection dictate the choice between homologous recombination, non-homologous end-joining and alternative end-joining.

Anastazja Grabarz1, Aurélia Barascu, Josée Guirouilh-Barbat, Bernard S Lopez.   

Abstract

A DNA double strand break (DSB) is a highly toxic lesion, which can generate genetic instability and profound genome rearrangements. However, DSBs are required to generate diversity during physiological processes such as meiosis or the establishment of the immune repertoire. Thus, the precise regulation of a complex network of processes is necessary for the maintenance of genomic stability, allowing genetic diversity but protecting against genetic instability and its consequences on oncogenesis. Two main strategies are employed for DSB repair: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). HR is initiated by single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) resection and requires sequence homology with an intact partner, while NHEJ requires neither resection at initiation nor a homologous partner. Thus, resection is an pivotal step at DSB repair initiation, driving the choice of the DSB repair pathway employed. However, an alternative end-joining (A-EJ) pathway, which is highly mutagenic, has recently been described; A-EJ is initiated by ssDNA resection but does not require a homologous partner. The choice of the appropriate DSB repair system, for instance according the cell cycle stage, is essential for genome stability maintenance. In this context, controlling the initial events of DSB repair is thus an essential step that may be irreversible, and the wrong decision should lead to dramatic consequences. Here, we first present the main DSB repair mechanisms and then discuss the importance of the choice of the appropriate DSB repair pathway according to the cell cycle phase. In a third section, we present the early steps of DSB repair i.e., DSB signaling, chromatin remodeling, and the regulation of ssDNA resection. In the last part, we discuss the competition between the different DSB repair mechanisms. Finally, we conclude with the importance of the fine tuning of this network for genome stability maintenance and for tumor protection in fine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA double strand break; Homologous recombination; Non homologous end joining; Resection; alternative end-joining; chromatin remodeling; genetic instability; genome rearrangements

Year:  2012        PMID: 22679557      PMCID: PMC3365807     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  152 in total

1.  Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  C Richardson; M Jasin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The language of covalent histone modifications.

Authors:  B D Strahl; C D Allis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A J Pierce; P Hu; M Han; N Ellis; M Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Chromatin remodeling by ATP-dependent molecular machines.

Authors:  Alexandra Lusser; James T Kadonaga
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 5.  Histone H2AX in DNA damage and repair.

Authors:  Olga A Sedelnikova; Duane R Pilch; Christophe Redon; William M Bonner
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Accumulation of checkpoint protein 53BP1 at DNA breaks involves its binding to phosphorylated histone H2AX.

Authors:  Irene M Ward; Kay Minn; Katherine G Jorda; Junjie Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination.

Authors:  Chris Allen; Akihiro Kurimasa; Mark A Brenneman; David J Chen; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  AKT1/PKBalpha kinase is frequently elevated in human cancers and its constitutive activation is required for oncogenic transformation in NIH3T3 cells.

Authors:  M Sun; G Wang; J E Paciga; R I Feldman; Z Q Yuan; X L Ma; S A Shelley; R Jove; P N Tsichlis; S V Nicosia; J Q Cheng
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Characterization of homologous recombination induced by replication inhibition in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Y Saintigny; F Delacôte; G Varès; F Petitot; S Lambert; D Averbeck; B S Lopez
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining.

Authors:  Kishore K Chiruvella; Zhuobin Liang; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  RPA puts the brakes on MMEJ.

Authors:  Mitch McVey
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 3.  Physiology of the read-write genome.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  LIG4 and RAD52 DNA repair genes polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Jaqueline De Azevêdo Silva; João Alexandre Trés Pancotto; Eduardo Antônio Donadi; Sergio Crovella; Paula Sandrin-Garcia
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Endonuclease G initiates DNA rearrangements at the MLL breakpoint cluster upon replication stress.

Authors:  B Gole; C Baumann; E Mian; C I Ireno; L Wiesmüller
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Eltrombopag promotes DNA repair in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Kacey L Guenther; Patali S Cheruku; Ayla Cash; Richard H Smith; Luigi J Alvarado; Sandra Burkett; Danielle M Townsley; Thomas Winkler; Andre Larochelle
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 7.  Protecting DNA from errors and damage: an overview of DNA repair mechanisms in plants compared to mammals.

Authors:  Claudia P Spampinato
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Genetic and biochemical evidences reveal novel insights into the mechanism underlying Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2-mediated abrogation of DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Indrajeet Ghodke; K Muniyappa
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 9.  New frontier in regenerative medicine: site-specific gene correction in patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Zita Garate; Brian R Davis; Oscar Quintana-Bustamante; Jose C Segovia
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 10.  Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Akira Tachibana; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.