Literature DB >> 22679342

Screening for prostate cancer using multivariate mixed-effects models.

Christopher H Morrell1, Larry J Brant, Shan Sheng, E Jeffrey Metter.   

Abstract

Using several variables known to be related to prostate cancer, a multivariate classification method is developed to predict the onset of clinical prostate cancer. A multivariate mixed-effects model is used to describe longitudinal changes in prostate specific antigen (PSA), a free testosterone index (FTI), and body mass index (BMI) before any clinical evidence of prostate cancer. The patterns of change in these three variables are allowed to vary depending on whether the subject develops prostate cancer or not and the severity of the prostate cancer at diagnosis. An application of Bayes' theorem provides posterior probabilities that we use to predict whether an individual will develop prostate cancer and, if so, whether it is a high-risk or a low-risk cancer. The classification rule is applied sequentially one multivariate observation at a time until the subject is classified as a cancer case or until the last observation has been used. We perform the analyses using each of the three variables individually, combined together in pairs, and all three variables together in one analysis. We compare the classification results among the various analyses and a simulation study demonstrates how the sensitivity of prediction changes with respect to the number and type of variables used in the prediction process.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22679342      PMCID: PMC3367770          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2011.644523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.404


  26 in total

1.  Latent variable models for longitudinal data with multiple continuous outcomes.

Authors:  J Roy; X Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Maximum likelihood estimation in the joint analysis of time-to-event and multiple longitudinal variables.

Authors:  Haiqun Lin; Charles E McCulloch; Susan T Mayne
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Predicting renal graft failure using multivariate longitudinal profiles.

Authors:  Steffen Fieuws; Geert Verbeke; Bart Maes; Yves Vanrenterghem
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Obesity and prostate cancer clinical risk factors at presentation: data from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; William W Bassett; Natalia Sadetsky; Stefanie Silva; Katrine Wallace; David J Pasta; Matthew R Cooperberg; June M Chan; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Predicting prostate specific antigen outcome preoperatively in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; M Weinstein; J E Tomaszewski; D Schultz; M Rhude; S Rocha; A Wein; J P Richie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Statistical models for longitudinal biomarkers of disease onset.

Authors:  E H Slate; B W Turnbull
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975-2004: an ecological study.

Authors:  Simon M Collin; Richard M Martin; Chris Metcalfe; David Gunnell; Peter C Albertsen; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Peter Stephens; J Athene Lane; Rollo Moore; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Body mass index and risk of prostate cancer in U.S. health professionals.

Authors:  Edward Giovannucci; Eric B Rimm; Yan Liu; Michael Leitzmann; Kana Wu; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Mixed-effects regression models for studying the natural history of prostate disease.

Authors:  J D Pearson; C H Morrell; P K Landis; H B Carter; L J Brant
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Mar 15-Apr 15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  8 in total

1.  A population-based study to develop juvenile arthritis case definitions for administrative health data using model-based dynamic classification.

Authors:  Allison Feely; Lily Sh Lim; Depeng Jiang; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  The effect of random-effects misspecification on classification accuracy.

Authors:  Riham El Saeiti; Marta García-Fiñana; David M Hughes
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.829

3.  A comparison of group prediction approaches in longitudinal discriminant analysis.

Authors:  David M Hughes; Riham El Saeiti; Marta García-Fiñana
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Dynamic longitudinal discriminant analysis using multiple longitudinal markers of different types.

Authors:  David M Hughes; Arnošt Komárek; Gabriela Czanner; Marta Garcia-Fiñana
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Accurate, fast, data efficient and interpretable glaucoma diagnosis with automated spatial analysis of the whole cup to disc profile.

Authors:  Ian J C MacCormick; Bryan M Williams; Yalin Zheng; Kun Li; Baidaa Al-Bander; Silvester Czanner; Rob Cheeseman; Colin E Willoughby; Emery N Brown; George L Spaeth; Gabriela Czanner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Associations of specific-age and decade recall body mass index trajectories with obesity-related cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte Watson; Andrew G Renehan; Nophar Geifman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Repeated measures discriminant analysis using multivariate generalized estimation equations.

Authors:  Anita Brobbey; Samuel Wiebe; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Colin Bruce Josephson; Tyler Williamson; Lisa M Lix; Tolulope T Sajobi
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Dynamic classification using credible intervals in longitudinal discriminant analysis.

Authors:  David M Hughes; Arnošt Komárek; Laura J Bonnett; Gabriela Czanner; Marta García-Fiñana
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.