BACKGROUND: It can be challenging to maintain longitudinal follow-up of subjects in clinical studies. COPDGene is a multicenter, observational study designed to identify genetic factors associated with COPD and to characterize COPD-related phenotypes. To obtain follow-up data on patient's vital status and outcomes, the COPDGene Longitudinal Follow-up (LFU) Program was developed to supplement its parent study. METHODS/ RESULTS: We used a telecommunication system that employed automated telephone contact or web-based questions to obtain longitudinal follow-up data in our subjects. A branching questionnaire asked about exacerbations, new therapies, smoking status, development of co-morbid conditions, and general health status. Study coordinators contacted subjects who did not respond to one of the automated methods. We enrolled 10,383 subjects in the COPDGene study. As of August 29, 2011, 7,959 subjects completed 19,955 surveys. On the first survey, 68.8% of subjects who completed their survey did so by electronic means, while 31.3% required coordinator phone follow-up. On each subsequent survey the number of subjects who completed their survey by electronic means increased, while the number of subjects who required coordinator follow-up decreased. Despite many of the patients in the cohort being chronically ill and elderly, there was broad acceptance of the system with over half the cohort using electronic response methods. CONCLUSIONS: The COPDGene LFU Study demonstrated that telecommunications was an effective way to obtain longitudinal follow-up of subjects in a large multicenter study. Web-based and automated phone contacts are accepted by research subjects and could serve as a model for LFU in future studies.
BACKGROUND: It can be challenging to maintain longitudinal follow-up of subjects in clinical studies. COPDGene is a multicenter, observational study designed to identify genetic factors associated with COPD and to characterize COPD-related phenotypes. To obtain follow-up data on patient's vital status and outcomes, the COPDGene Longitudinal Follow-up (LFU) Program was developed to supplement its parent study. METHODS/ RESULTS: We used a telecommunication system that employed automated telephone contact or web-based questions to obtain longitudinal follow-up data in our subjects. A branching questionnaire asked about exacerbations, new therapies, smoking status, development of co-morbid conditions, and general health status. Study coordinators contacted subjects who did not respond to one of the automated methods. We enrolled 10,383 subjects in the COPDGene study. As of August 29, 2011, 7,959 subjects completed 19,955 surveys. On the first survey, 68.8% of subjects who completed their survey did so by electronic means, while 31.3% required coordinator phone follow-up. On each subsequent survey the number of subjects who completed their survey by electronic means increased, while the number of subjects who required coordinator follow-up decreased. Despite many of the patients in the cohort being chronically ill and elderly, there was broad acceptance of the system with over half the cohort using electronic response methods. CONCLUSIONS: The COPDGene LFU Study demonstrated that telecommunications was an effective way to obtain longitudinal follow-up of subjects in a large multicenter study. Web-based and automated phone contacts are accepted by research subjects and could serve as a model for LFU in future studies.
Authors: T A Seemungal; G C Donaldson; E A Paul; J C Bestall; D J Jeffries; J A Wedzicha Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Elizabeth A Regan; John E Hokanson; James R Murphy; Barry Make; David A Lynch; Terri H Beaty; Douglas Curran-Everett; Edwin K Silverman; James D Crapo Journal: COPD Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Jeong H Yun; Andrew Lamb; Robert Chase; Dave Singh; Margaret M Parker; Aabida Saferali; Jørgen Vestbo; Ruth Tal-Singer; Peter J Castaldi; Edwin K Silverman; Craig P Hersh Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2018-04-28 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Surya P Bhatt; Young-Il Kim; James M Wells; William C Bailey; Joe W Ramsdell; Marilyn G Foreman; Robert L Jensen; Douglas S Stinson; Carla G Wilson; David A Lynch; Barry J Make; Mark T Dransfield Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-03
Authors: Diego J Maselli; Surya P Bhatt; Antonio Anzueto; Russell P Bowler; Dawn L DeMeo; Alejandro A Diaz; Mark T Dransfield; Ashraf Fawzy; Marilyn G Foreman; Nicola A Hanania; Craig P Hersh; Victor Kim; Gregory L Kinney; Nirupama Putcha; Emily S Wan; J Michael Wells; Gloria E Westney; Kendra A Young; Edwin K Silverman; MeiLan K Han; Barry J Make Journal: Chest Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Cardella Leak; Kathryn Goggins; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Cecelia Theobald; Katharine M Donato; Susan P Bell; John Schnelle; Sunil Kripalani Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015
Authors: David C LaFon; Surya P Bhatt; Wassim W Labaki; Farbod N Rahaghi; Matthew Moll; Russ P Bowler; Elizabeth A Regan; Barry J Make; James D Crapo; Raul San Jose Estepar; Alejandro A Diaz; Edwin K Silverman; MeiLan K Han; Brian Hobbs; Michael H Cho; George R Washko; Mark T Dransfield; J Michael Wells Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Victor Kim; Huaqing Zhao; Elizabeth Regan; MeiLan K Han; Barry J Make; James D Crapo; Paul W Jones; Jeffrey L Curtis; Edwin K Silverman; Gerard J Criner Journal: Chest Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: J Michael Wells; George R Washko; MeiLan K Han; Naseer Abbas; Hrudaya Nath; A James Mamary; Elizabeth Regan; William C Bailey; Fernando J Martinez; Elizabeth Westfall; Terri H Beaty; Douglas Curran-Everett; Jeffrey L Curtis; John E Hokanson; David A Lynch; Barry J Make; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman; Russell P Bowler; Mark T Dransfield Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Surya P Bhatt; Jessica C Sieren; Mark T Dransfield; George R Washko; John D Newell; Douglas S Stinson; Gideon K D Zamba; Eric A Hoffman Journal: Thorax Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 9.139