| Literature DB >> 22676333 |
Caterina Lande1, Claudia Boccardi, Lorenzo Citti, Alberto Mercatanti, Milena Rizzo, Silvia Rocchiccioli, Lorena Tedeschi, Maria Giovanna Trivella, Antonella Cecchettini.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22676333 PMCID: PMC3393606 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Figure 1Kinetic characterization and ribozyme transfection. A) Graph describing the Eadie-Hofstee interpolation of experimental kobs values (v0/[Riboz]) calculated for the in vitro cleavage of synthetic substrate under multiple turnover conditions. The resulting kinetic parameters are also indicated. B) fluorescence microscopy image of VSMCs after OligoF administration. The intracellular fluorescence demonstrates the oligonucleotide internalization
Figure 2PDGFR-β knock-down assessment and toxicity. A) Histogram of Real-time PCR amplification of RNA recovered from VSMCs. Control bar represents the results obtained with VSMCs cultured in complete medium and normalized to 1 as reference value. Gray bars represent mean ± SE of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated applying the unpaired t-test (* P < 0.05). B) Graph of summarizing MTT assay. VSMCs were cultured in standard condition for the control or in the presence of active (aHHR) and inactive ribozymes (iHHR). Each point represents the mean ± SD of 3 independent replicates
Figure 3Migration activity of VSMCs cultured under different conditions. A)- Wound assay istogram: untreated represents quiescent VSMCs cultured in absence of serum; PDGF accounts for VSMCs stimulated for migration with serum supplemented with PDGF-BB; PDGF+Active ribozyme or +Inactive ribozyme are VSMCs stimulated as before and treated with active or inactive ribozymes. B)- Chemotactic activity induced by PDGF-BB on VSMCs. Bars represent the mean ± SE of at least three independent experiments. Data computing the migration activities of VSMCs were statistically elaborated using the unpaired t-test (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01)
Figure 4Proteomic approach to phosphorylation study of PDI-A3 and Hsp-60 chaperones. Middle panel shows the 2D-PAGE mapping of both proteins after silver staining. Inserts illustrate the immunoblotting results of membranes probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Upper inserts refer to HSP-60 while lower inserts describe the PDI-A3 staining
Figure 5Phosphorylated protein comparative analyses. A) Histogram of PDI-A3 phosphorylation . B) Histogram of HSP-60 phosphorylation. Untreated: refers to quiescent VSMCs. Gray scale value of untreated samples was conventionally assumed to be 1 as normalization factor; PDGF: refers to VSMCs stimulated with PDGF-BB; PDGF+active ribozyme and PDGF+inactive ribozyme: refer to VSMCs cultured as before and additionally treated with active or inactive ribozyme. Bars represent the mean ± SE of at least three independent experiments. Data were statistically elaborated using the unpaired t-test (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001)
Figure 6Working model describing the different effects on PDI-A3 and HSP-60 phosphorylation due to PDGFR-β knock-down. Ribozyme might impair the β-β and α-β dimer formations decreasing the opportunities of PDGF-BB binding. This inhibition might reduce (if not abolish) the PDGFR-β signaling pathway and conversely increase the PDGFR-α pathway