Literature DB >> 22675590

Complete genome sequence of the thermophilic sulfur-reducer Desulfurobacterium thermolithotrophum type strain (BSA(T)) from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent.

Markus Göker, Hajnalka Daligault, Romano Mwirichia, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Shweta Deshpande, Ioanna Pagani, Roxanne Tapia, Jan-Fang Cheng, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Cliff Han, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Chongle Pan, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Stefan Spring, Johannes Sikorski, Reinhard Wirth, John C Detter, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Desulfurobacterium thermolithotrophum L'Haridon et al. 1998 is the type species of the genus Desulfurobacterium which belongs to the family Desulfurobacteriaceae. The species is of interest because it represents the first thermophilic bacterium that can act as a primary producer in the temperature range of 45-75 °C (optimum 70°C) and is incapable of growing under microaerophilic conditions. Strain BSA(T) preferentially synthesizes high-melting-point fatty acids (C(18) and C(20)) which is hypothesized to be a strategy to ensure the functionality of the membrane at high growth temperatures. This is the second completed genome sequence of a member of the family Desulfurobacteriaceae and the first sequence from the genus Desulfurobacterium. The 1,541,968 bp long genome harbors 1,543 protein-coding and 51 RNA genes and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Desulfurobacteriaceae; GEBA; Gram-negative; anaerobic; marine; neutrophilic; obligately chemolithoautotrophic; sulfur-reducing; thermophilic

Year:  2011        PMID: 22675590      PMCID: PMC3368423          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2465574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain BSAT (= DSM 11699) is the type strain of the species Desulfurobacterium thermolithotrophum, which is the type species of its genus Desulfurobacterium [1], that currently consists of three validly named species [19]. The genus name is derived from the Latin words 'de' meaning 'from', 'sulfur', and 'bacterium' meaning 'a stick, staff', yielding the Neo-Latin word 'Desulfurobacterium' meaning 'sulfur-reducing rod-shaped bacterium' [1]. The species epithet is derived from the latinized Greek word 'thermê' meaning 'heat', the latinized Greek word 'lithos' meaning 'stone' and the latinized Greek word 'trophos' meaning 'feeder, rearer, one who feeds', yielding the Neo-Latin word 'thermolithotrophum' meaning 'referring to its thermophilic way of life and lithotrophic metabolism' [1,2]. Strain BSAT was collected from the Snake Pit vent field on the mid Atlantic Ridge with the help of the submersible Nautile at a depth of 3,500 m [1]. Although it shares most features with other members of the Aquificales, it is distinct in its inability to grow under microaerophilic conditions [1]. Strain BSAT was the first non-hyperthermophilic primary producer isolated from deep-sea vents [1]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for D. thermolithotrophum strain BSAT, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of D. thermolithotrophum BSAT was compared using NCBI BLAST [3,4] under default settings (e.g. considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [5] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [6] were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genera were Desulfurobacterium (30.3%), Thermoanaerobacter (18.8%), Thermovibrio (14.2%), Balnearium (11.0%) and Persephonella (4.1%) (80 hits in total). Regarding the two hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 98.9%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 92.8%. Regarding the single hit to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 98.6%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 64.4%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was “Desulfurobacterium crinifex” (AJ507320), which corresponded to an identity of 98.6% and HSP coverage of 64.4%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AF068800 ('hydrothermal vent clone VC2.1Bac24'), which showed an identity of 99.7% and an HSP coverage of 92.7%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'hydrotherm' (5.4%), 'vent' (4.9%), 'microbi' (3.6%), 'water' (2.9%) and 'deep' (2.0%) (167 hits in total). The most frequently occurring keyword within the labels of those environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species was 'hydrotherm, vent' (50.0%) (1 hit in total). shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of D. thermolithotrophum BSAT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ by two nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AJ001049).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of D. thermolithotrophum relative to the type strains of the other species within the order Aquificales. The tree was inferred from 1,422 aligned characters [7,8] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [9]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [10] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates [11] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [12] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [13] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks (referenced in [14-17] and CP002444).

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of D. thermolithotrophum relative to the type strains of the other species within the order Aquificales. The tree was inferred from 1,422 aligned characters [7,8] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [9]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [10] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates [11] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [12] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [13] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks (referenced in [14-17] and CP002444).
Table 1

Classification and general D. thermolithotrophum BSAT in accordance with the MIGS recommendations [18] and the NamesforLife database [19].

MIGS ID    Property     Term     Evidence code
    Current classification     Domain Bacteria     TAS [20]
     Phylum ‘Aquificae     TAS [22]
     Class Aquificae     TAS [23,24]
     Order Aquificales     TAS [23,25,26]
     Family Desulfurobacteriaceae     TAS [25]
     Genus Desulfurobacterium     TAS [1,25,27]
    Species     Desulfurobacterium thermolithotrophum     TAS [1]
MIGS-7    Strain     BSAT     TAS [1]
MIGS-12    Reference for biomaterial     DSM 11699     TAS [1]
    Gram stain     negative     TAS [1]
    Cell shape     rod-shaped     TAS [1]
    Motility     motile     TAS [1]
    Sporulation     non-sporulating     TAS [1]
    Temperature range     40-75°C     TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature     70°C     TAS [1]
    Salinity     15 to 70 g per l, optimum at 35 g     TAS [1]
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement     strictly anaerobic     TAS [1]
    Carbon source     CO2     NAS
    Energy metabolism     chemolitoautotrophic, sulfur reduction     TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat     marine     TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship     free-living     TAS [1]
    Biosafety level     1     TAS [28]
MIGS-19    Trophic level     level 1 primary producer     TAS [1]
MIGS-23.1    Isolation     deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney     TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location     Snake Pit vent field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge     TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time     November/December 1995     TAS [1,29]
MIGS-4.1    Latitude     23.36     TAS [1,29]
MIGS-4.2    Longitude     -44.93     TAS [1,29]
MIGS-4.3    Depth     3,500 m     TAS [1,29]
MIGS-4.4    Altitude     -3,500 m     TAS [1]

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [30].

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [30]. The cells of strain BSAT are small rods, about 1-2 µm long and 0.4-0-5 µm wide and occur singly or in pairs (Figure 2) [1]. Cells stain Gram-negative and are motile via three polar flagella; spores are not produced [1]. Strain BSAT grows between 40 and 75°C with an optimum around 70°C, while no growth is detected at 37 or 80°C after 48 h incubation [1]. Growth occurs between pH 4.4 and 8, with an optimum around pH 6.25. No growth is detected at pH 3.7 or 8.5 after 48h incubation at 70°C [1]. Growth is observed in sea salts at concentrations ranging from 15 to 70g/l, with an optimum of approximately 35g/l (corresponding to 23 g NaCl/l [1]). No growth was observed in sea salts at concentrations of 10 and 80 g/l after 48 h incubation at 70°C [1]. Under optimal growth conditions (temperature, pH and NaCl), the doubling time of strain BSAT is around 135 min [1]. Strain BSAT is a strictly anaerobic chemolithotrophic organism that uses sulfur as an electron acceptor in the presence of H+ for growth [1]. It utilizes thiosulfate, sulfite and polysulfides as alternative electron acceptors with H2 as an electron donor. Cysteine, nitrate or nitrite are not utilized and growth on sulfur, thiosulfate, polysulfides or sulfite was accompanied by exponential H2S production [1]. No growth was observed on acetate, formate, methanol, monomethylamine and yeast extract with N2-CO2 or H2 atmosphere in the presence or absence of sulfur [1]. Nitrate, tryptone and yeast extract were used as nitrogen sources [1]. Growth of strain BSAT was inhibited by chloramphenicol, penicillin G and rifampicin at 100 µg/ml but not by streptomycin when added before incubation at the optimum temperature [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of D. thermolithotrophum BSAT

Scanning electron micrograph of D. thermolithotrophum BSAT

Chemotaxonomy

The total lipid content of strain BSAT is about 6% of the total dry weight and is characterized by the presence of aminophospholipids and a phospholipid at about 66%, R 0.7 and 30%, R 0.5, respectively, as well as minor compounds [1]. Gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid components of both compounds revealed the presence of saturated and monounsaturated acyl chains [1]. The phosphoinositol contains C16:0 (15%), C18:1 (41%) identified as methyl-oleate, and C18:0 (44%) identified as stearate. The phosphoamino-positive compounds contained C16:0 (14%), C18:1 (43%), C18:0 (31%) and C20:0 (12%), as well as minor compounds [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [31], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [32]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [13] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

D. thermolithotrophum strain BSAT, DSM 11699, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 829 (Desulfurobacterium medium) [34] at 70°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen 10262) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer without modifications. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [35].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [36]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 96 contigs in one scaffold was converted into a phrap [37] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (45.0 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [38] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 192.1 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [37] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [36], Dupfinisher [39], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 101 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [40]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 322.0 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 126,482 pyrosequence and 12,545,740 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [41] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [42]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [33].

Genome properties

The genome consists of one circular chromosome with a total length of 1,541,968 bp and a G+C content of 35.0% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 1,594 genes predicted, 1,543 were protein-coding genes, and 51 RNAs; 34 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (75.5%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute    Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)    1,541,968     100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)    1,448,295     93.93%
DNA G+C content (bp)    538,896     34.95%
Number of replicons    1
Extrachromosomal elements    0
Total genes    1,594     100.00%
RNA genes    51     3.20%
rRNA operons    2
tRNA genes    43     2.70%
Protein-coding genes    1,543     96.80%
Pseudo genes    34     2.13%
Genes with function prediction    1,204     75.53%
Genes in paralog clusters    600     37.64%
Genes assigned to COGs    1,330     83.44%
Genes assigned Pfam domains    1,327     83.25%
Genes with signal peptides    394     24.72%
Genes with transmembrane helices    322     20.20%
CRISPR repeats    1
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From bottom to top: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    value    %age     Description
J    142    9.7     Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0    0.0     RNA processing and modification
K    47    3.2     Transcription
L    126    8.6     Replication, recombination and repair
B    1    0.1     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    20    1.4     Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0    0.0     Nuclear structure
V    13    0.9     Defense mechanisms
T    52    3.6     Signal transduction mechanisms
M    110    7.5     Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    67    4.6     Cell motility
Z    0    0.0     Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.0     Extracellular structures
U    74    5.1     Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O    55    3.8     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    113    7.7     Energy production and conversion
G    42    2.9     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    108    7.4     Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    57    3.9     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    88    6.0     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    38    2.6     Lipid transport and metabolism
P    57    3.9     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    13    0.9     Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    140    9.6     General function prediction only
S    97    6.6     Function unknown
-    264    16.6     Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From bottom to top: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property     Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality     Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used     Four genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library, two 454 PE library (10.5 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms     Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage     282.0 × Illumina; 40.0 x pyrosequence
MIGS-30     Assemblers     Newbler version 2.3, p Velvet version 0.7.63, phrap version SPS - 4.24
MIGS-32     Gene calling method     Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
     INSDC ID     CP002543
     Genbank Date of Release     March 2, 2011
     GOLD ID     Gc01671
     NCBI project ID     51497
     Database: IMG-GEBA     2503754020
MIGS-13     Source material identifier     DSM 11699
     Project relevance     Tree of Life, GEBA
  27 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Desulfurobacterium atlanticum sp. nov., Desulfurobacterium pacificum sp. nov. and Thermovibrio guaymasensis sp. nov., three thermophilic members of the Desulfurobacteriaceae fam. nov., a deep branching lineage within the Bacteria.

Authors:  S L'Haridon; A-L Reysenbach; B J Tindall; P Schönheit; A Banta; U Johnsen; P Schumann; A Gambacorta; E Stackebrandt; C Jeanthon
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Desulfurobacterium crinifex sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, pinkish-streamer forming, chemolithoautotrophic bacterium isolated from a Juan de Fuca Ridge hydrothermal vent and amendment of the genus Desulfurobacterium.

Authors:  Karine Alain; Sophie Rolland; Philippe Crassous; Françoise Lesongeur; Magali Zbinden; Christian le Gall; Anne Godfroy; Antoine Page; S Kim Juniper; Marie-Anne Cambon-Bonavita; Francis Duchiron; Joël Querellou
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Complete and draft genome sequences of six members of the Aquificales.

Authors:  Anna-Louise Reysenbach; N Hamamura; M Podar; E Griffiths; S Ferreira; R Hochstein; J Heidelberg; J Johnson; D Mead; A Pohorille; M Sarmiento; K Schweighofer; R Seshadri; M A Voytek
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  5 in total

1.  Characterization of the frhAGB-encoding hydrogenase from a non-methanogenic hyperthermophilic archaeon.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Jeon; Jae Kyu Lim; Min-Sik Kim; Tae-Jun Yang; Seong-Hyuk Lee; Seung Seob Bae; Yun Jae Kim; Sang Hee Lee; Jung-Hyun Lee; Sung Gyun Kang; Hyun Sook Lee
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Insight into the evolution of microbial metabolism from the deep-branching bacterium, Thermovibrio ammonificans.

Authors:  Donato Giovannelli; Stefan M Sievert; Michael Hügler; Stephanie Markert; Dörte Becher; Thomas Schweder; Costantino Vetriani
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Complete genome sequence of Thermovibrio ammonificans HB-1(T), a thermophilic, chemolithoautotrophic bacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent.

Authors:  Donato Giovannelli; Jessica Ricci; Ileana Pérez-Rodríguez; Michael Hügler; Charles O'Brien; Ramaydalis Keddis; Ashley Grosche; Lynne Goodwin; David Bruce; Karen W Davenport; Chris Detter; James Han; Shunsheng Han; Natalia Ivanova; Miriam L Land; Natalia Mikhailova; Matt Nolan; Sam Pitluck; Roxanne Tapia; Tanja Woyke; Costantino Vetriani
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-09-26

4.  Genome Analysis of Structure-Function Relationships in Respiratory Complex I, an Ancient Bioenergetic Enzyme.

Authors:  Mauro Degli Esposti
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Microbial diversity of thermophiles with biomass deconstruction potential in a foliage-rich hot spring.

Authors:  Li Sin Lee; Kian Mau Goh; Chia Sing Chan; Geok Yuan Annie Tan; Wai-Fong Yin; Chun Shiong Chong; Kok-Gan Chan
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.