Literature DB >> 22675589

Genome sequence of the filamentous, gliding Thiothrix nivea neotype strain (JP2(T)).

Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Marcel Huntemann, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Birte Abt, Susanne Verbarg, Markus Göker, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Tanja Woyke.   

Abstract

Thiothrix nivea (Rabenhorst 1865) Winogradsky 1888 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Larkin and Shinabarger 1983 is the type species of the genus Thiothrix in the family Thiotrichaceae. The species is of interest not only because of its isolated location in the yet to be genomically characterized region of the tree of life, but also because of its life-style with gliding gonidia, the multilayer sheath, rosettes, and the embedded sulfur granules. Strain JP2(T) is the neotype strain of the species which was first observed by Rabenhorst in 1865 and later reclassified by Winogradsky in 1888 into the then novel genus Thiothrix. This is the first completed (improved-high-quality-draft) genome sequence to be published of a member of the family Thiotrichaceae. The genome in its current assembly consists of 15 contigs in four scaffolds with a total of 4,691,711 bp bearing 4,542 protein-coding and 52 RNA genes and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Gram-negative; Thiotrichaceae; filaments; gliding motility; mesophile; sheath; strictly aerobic; sulfur granules

Year:  2011        PMID: 22675589      PMCID: PMC3368414          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2344929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain JP2T (= DSM 5205 = ATCC 35100) is the type strain of Thiothrix nivea [1,2] which is the type species of the genus Thiothrix [1,2]. Cultures of the species were first observed and classified as “Beggiatoa nivea” in 1865 by Rabenhorst [3] and later (1888) placed into the novel genus Thiothrix by Winogradsky [2]. The species was included on the Approved List of Bacterial Names Amended edition in 1980 [4]. Axenic cultures isolated from sulfide-containing well water became available in 1980 through the work of J. M. Larkin [5], with the formal description of strain JP2T as the neotype strain of the species T. nivea in 1983 [1], as well as strain JP1 as a reference strain within the species [1]. The generic name derives from the Neo-Greek words theion, sulfur, and thrix, hair [6]. The species epithet is derived from the Latin word nivea snow-white [6]. The species became well known for its sulfur granules, the gliding motility and the typical rosettes [1], which were first observed by Winogradsky [2]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for T. nivea JP2T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of T. nivea JP2T was compared using NCBI BLAST [7] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [8] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [9]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genus was Thiothrix (100.0%, 12 hits in total). Regarding the single hit to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 99.5%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 99.4%. Regarding the four hits to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 94.2%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 96.0%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was, Thiothrix fructosivorans (GU269554) which corresponded to an identity of 94.5% and an HSP coverage of 100.0%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AM490765 ('Linking and functional nutrient spiraling mats (USA) microbial mat sulfidic cave spring Lower Kane Cave Big Horn LKC22 clone SS LKC22 UB32'), which showed an identity of 96.7% and an HSP coverage of 100.0%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'sulfid' (4.2%), 'microbi' (4.0%), 'biofilm' (3.4%), 'cave' (2.8%) and 'karst' (2.7%) (238 hits in total). Environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found. These keywords reflect the ecological properties reported for the species and strain JP2T in the original description [1,2]. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of T. nivea in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (L40993), which contains six ambiguous base calls.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. nivea relative to the other type strains within the family Thiotrichaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,332 aligned characters [10,11] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [12]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [13] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 200 ML bootstrap replicates [14] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [15] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [16] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. nivea relative to the other type strains within the family Thiotrichaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,332 aligned characters [10,11] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [12]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [13] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 200 ML bootstrap replicates [14] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [15] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [16] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks.
Table 1

Classification and general features of T. nivea JP2T according to the MIGS recommendations [17] and the NamesforLife database [18].

MIGS ID    Property     Term     Evidence code
    Current classification     Domain Bacteria     TAS [19]
     Phylum “Proteobacteria     TAS [20,21]
     Class Gammaproteobacteria     TAS [22]
     Order Thiotrichales     TAS [22,23]
     Family Thiotrichaceae     TAS [22,24]
     Genus Thiothrix     TAS [2,4,25-27]
     Species Thiothrix nivea     TAS [1,5]
     Type strain JP2     TAS [1]
    Gram stain     negative     TAS [1]
    Cell shape     rod-shaped, filaments with a sheath, rosettes     TAS [1]
    Motility     gliding     TAS [1]
    Sporulation     not reported
    Temperature range     mesophilic, 6-34°C     TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature     25-30°C     TAS [1]
    Salinity     not reported
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement     strictly aerobic     TAS [1]
    Carbon source     acetate, malate, pyruvate, oxalacetate     TAS [1]
    Energy metabolism     chemolithotroph     NAS
MIGS-6    Habitat     spring-generated, flowing, H2S-enriched waters,      deep sea hydrothermal vents     TAS [28,29]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship     free-living     TAS [1]
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity     none     TAS [1]
    Biosafety level     1     TAS [30]
    Isolation     H2S-enriched well water     TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location     John Pennycamp State Park, Key Largo, FL, USA     TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time     1983 or before     NAS
MIGS-4.1    Latitude     25.13     NAS
MIGS-4.2    Longitude     -80.41     NAS
MIGS-4.3    Depth     not reported
MIGS-4.4    Altitude     not reported

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [31].

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [31]. Cells of strain JP2T are rod shaped with various lengths (Figure 2). Cultures of T. nivea contain gliding gonidia, filaments and rosettes (= aggregations of gonidial cells, not visible in Figure 2) [1]. The presence of a sheath was first reported in the 19th century [2] and later confirmed for the neotype strain [1]. The sheath contains several separate layers [1] of so far unknown structure. Motility was observed, but no flagella [1]. Numerous genes allocated to the functional role category motility were identified in the genome (see below). Many of these genes might be involved in the formation of the polar located fimbriae [32]. The typical rosettes generated by T. nivea are known from sulfide-containing waters [1,2]. Sulfur granules are invaginated by the cells, as reported in detail by Larkin and Shinabarger [1]. Strain JP2T stains Gram-negative, and grows only aerobically, best within a temperature range of 20 – 30°C [1]. Both the neotype strain and reference strain JP1 produce oxidase, but not catalase. The strains also produce poly-β-hydroxybutyrate [1]. Strain JP2T uses only four carbon sources; acetate, malate, pyruvate and oxalacetate [1]. Ammonia and nitrate (but not nitrite) are used as sole nitrogen sources [1]. The sole sulfur sources are sulfide and thiosulfate. What remains unresolved, based on the literature is whether or not T. nivea is autotrophic, obtaining carbon from CO2 and energy via oxidation of sulfide as reported by Winogradsky [13] or not, as reported by Larkin and Shinabarger [1]. In the case in which strain JP2T could use CO2 as a carbon source as well as acetate, malate, pyruvate and oxalacetate, while oxidizing the reduced sulfur compounds, it could be considered to be a mixotroph [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of T. nivea JP2T

Scanning electron micrograph of T. nivea JP2T

Chemotaxonomy

There are no chemotaxonomic data on cell wall structure, cellular lipids, quinones or polar lipids of strain JP2T.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [33], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [34]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome On Line Database [16] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property    Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality    Improved-high-quality-draft
MIGS-28     Libraries used    Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,     one 454 PE library (12 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms    Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage    111.5 × Illumina; 28.9 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30     Assemblers    Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-6/30/2009, Velvet version 1.0.13, phrap SPS-4.24
MIGS-32     Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
     INSDC ID    Not yet available
     Genbank Date of Release    Not yet available
     GOLD ID    Gi03023
     NCBI project ID    51139
     Database: IMG-GEBA    2506520049
MIGS-13     Source material identifier    DSM 5205
     Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. nivea JP2T, DSM 5205, was grown in DSMZ medium 1300 (Thiothrix Medium) [35] at 25°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED 600100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, but adding 10µl proteinase K for one hour extended lysis at 58°C. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [36].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [37]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 269 contigs in four scaffolds was converted into a phrap assembly by [38] making fake reads from the consensus to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (518.8 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [39], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 162.5 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [38] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [37], Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 632 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the final sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [40]. This genome is not finished. The improved high quality draft consists of 15 contigs in four scaffolds. Some mis-assemblies are possible in the final assembly. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 140.4 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 444,417 pyrosequence and 14,381,947 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [41] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [42]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [43].

Genome properties

The genome consists in the current assembly of 15 contigs in four scaffolds with a length of 5,599 bp, 7,015 bp, 40,927 bp, and 4,638,170 bp, respectively, and a G+C content of 54.9% (Table 3). Of the 4,594 genes predicted, 4,542 were protein-coding genes, and 52 RNAs; 213 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (98.8%) were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute    Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)    4,691,711     100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)    4,147,061     88.39%
DNA G+C content (bp)    2,573,778     54.87%
Number of scaffolds    4
Number of contigs    15
Total genes    4,594     100.00%
RNA genes    52     1.15%
rRNA operons    2
Protein-coding genes    4,542     98.85%
Pseudo genes    213     4.64%
Genes with function prediction    2,918     63.52%
Genes in paralog clusters    2,282     49.67%
Genes assigned to COGs    3,275     71.29%
Genes assigned Pfam domains    3,338     72.66%
Genes with signal peptides    971     21.14%
Genes with transmembrane helices    1,027     22.36%
CRISPR repeats    4
Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    value   %age      Description
J    168   4.7      Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    3   0.1      RNA processing and modification
K    211   5.9      Transcription
L    276   7.7      Replication, recombination and repair
B    1   0.0      Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    48   1.3      Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0   0.0      Nuclear structure
V    70   2.0      Defense mechanisms
T    208   5.8      Signal transduction mechanisms
M    266   7.4      Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    56   1.6      Cell motility
Z    0   0.0      Cytoskeleton
W    0   0.0      Extracellular structures
U    102   2.9      Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O    162   4.5      Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    289   8.1      Energy production and conversion
G    127   3.6      Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    210   5.9      Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    59   1.7      Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    143   4.0      Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    82   2.3      Lipid transport and metabolism
P    196   5.5      Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    58   1.6      Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    407   11.4      General function prediction only
S    437   12.2      Function unknown
-    1,319   28.7      Not in COGs

Insight into the genome sequence

The genomic basis for gliding motility is not yet completely resolved, but the requirement of the genes gldA, gldF and gldG was described [44]. Genes gldA, gldF and gldG exhibit a high degree of sequence similarity to components of ABC transporters [44]. A closer examination of the JP2T genome revealed a region of three genes (Thini_0004.00016790, Thini_0004.00016780, Thini_0004.00016770, currently annotated as ABC-type uncharacterized transport system), for which the derived protein sequences show high similarity to GldA, GldF and GldG of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 (Bd1023, Bd1024 and Bd1025) [45]. The requirement of gldA for gliding motility was experimentally shown for Flavobacterium johnsoniae. A non-motile mutant lacking the intact gldA gene was complemented by a vector carrying an intact gldA gene. The motility of the mutant was restored [46]. While we were able to locate a phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene in the genome, (Thini_0004.00035050), we could not identify a gene for malate dehydrogenase. Unless T. nivea encodes a malate dehydrogenase that is not homologous to other malate dehydrogenases, we can not confirm for the neotype strain the genomic basis for the speculation that the original T. nivea culture can fix CO2 as reported by Winogradsky [13] and is a mixotroph [1].
  24 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet.

Authors:  J P Euzéby
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-04

6.  Phylogenetic relationships of filamentous sulfur bacteria (Thiothrix spp. and Eikelboom type 021N bacteria) isolated from wastewater-treatment plants and description of Thiothrix eikelboomii sp. nov., Thiothrix unzii sp. nov., Thiothrix fructosivorans sp. nov. and Thiothrix defluvii sp. nov.

Authors:  R Howarth; R F Unz; E M Seviour; R J Seviour; L L Blackall; R W Pickup; J G Jones; J Yaguchi; I M Head
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-10

7.  Characterization of filamentous Eikelboom type 021N bacteria and description of Thiothrix disciformis sp. nov. and Thiothrix flexilis sp. nov.

Authors:  Shinobu Aruga; Yoichi Kamagata; Tetsuro Kohno; Satoshi Hanada; Kazunori Nakamura; Takahiro Kanagawa
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  2 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of carboxyl esterases of gill chamber-associated microbiota in the deep-sea shrimp Rimicaris exoculata by using functional metagenomics.

Authors:  María Alcaide; Anatoli Tchigvintsev; Mónica Martínez-Martínez; Ana Popovic; Oleg N Reva; Álvaro Lafraya; Rafael Bargiela; Taras Y Nechitaylo; Ruth Matesanz; Marie-Anne Cambon-Bonavita; Mohamed Jebbar; Michail M Yakimov; Alexei Savchenko; Olga V Golyshina; Alexander F Yakunin; Peter N Golyshin; Manuel Ferrer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  The Phylogeny, Biodiversity, and Ecology of the Chloroflexi in Activated Sludge.

Authors:  Lachlan B M Speirs; Daniel T F Rice; Steve Petrovski; Robert J Seviour
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.