| Literature DB >> 22675589 |
Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Marcel Huntemann, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Birte Abt, Susanne Verbarg, Markus Göker, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Tanja Woyke.
Abstract
Thiothrix nivea (Rabenhorst 1865) Winogradsky 1888 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Larkin and Shinabarger 1983 is the type species of the genus Thiothrix in the family Thiotrichaceae. The species is of interest not only because of its isolated location in the yet to be genomically characterized region of the tree of life, but also because of its life-style with gliding gonidia, the multilayer sheath, rosettes, and the embedded sulfur granules. Strain JP2(T) is the neotype strain of the species which was first observed by Rabenhorst in 1865 and later reclassified by Winogradsky in 1888 into the then novel genus Thiothrix. This is the first completed (improved-high-quality-draft) genome sequence to be published of a member of the family Thiotrichaceae. The genome in its current assembly consists of 15 contigs in four scaffolds with a total of 4,691,711 bp bearing 4,542 protein-coding and 52 RNA genes and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.Entities:
Keywords: GEBA; Gram-negative; Thiotrichaceae; filaments; gliding motility; mesophile; sheath; strictly aerobic; sulfur granules
Year: 2011 PMID: 22675589 PMCID: PMC3368414 DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2344929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. nivea relative to the other type strains within the family Thiotrichaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,332 aligned characters [10,11] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [12]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [13] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 200 ML bootstrap replicates [14] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [15] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [16] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks.
Classification and general features of T. nivea JP2T according to the MIGS recommendations [17] and the NamesforLife database [18].
| MIGS ID | Property | Term | Evidence code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current classification | Domain | TAS [ | |
| Phylum “ | TAS [ | ||
| Class | TAS [ | ||
| Order | TAS [ | ||
| Family | TAS [ | ||
| Genus | TAS [ | ||
| Species | TAS [ | ||
| Type strain JP2 | TAS [ | ||
| Gram stain | negative | TAS [ | |
| Cell shape | rod-shaped, filaments with a sheath, rosettes | TAS [ | |
| Motility | gliding | TAS [ | |
| Sporulation | not reported | ||
| Temperature range | mesophilic, 6-34°C | TAS [ | |
| Optimum temperature | 25-30°C | TAS [ | |
| Salinity | not reported | ||
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | strictly aerobic | TAS [ |
| Carbon source | acetate, malate, pyruvate, oxalacetate | TAS [ | |
| Energy metabolism | chemolithotroph | NAS | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | spring-generated, flowing, H2S-enriched waters, | TAS [ |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | free-living | TAS [ |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | none | TAS [ |
| Biosafety level | 1 | TAS [ | |
| Isolation | H2S-enriched well water | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | John Pennycamp State Park, Key Largo, FL, USA | TAS [ |
| MIGS-5 | Sample collection time | 1983 or before | NAS |
| MIGS-4.1 | Latitude | 25.13 | NAS |
| MIGS-4.2 | Longitude | -80.41 | NAS |
| MIGS-4.3 | Depth | not reported | |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | not reported |
Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [31].
Figure 2Scanning electron micrograph of T. nivea JP2T
Genome sequencing project information
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| MIGS-31 | Finishing quality | Improved-high-quality-draft |
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library, |
| MIGS-29 | Sequencing platforms | Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium |
| MIGS-31.2 | Sequencing coverage | 111.5 × Illumina; 28.9 × pyrosequence |
| MIGS-30 | Assemblers | Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-6/30/2009, Velvet version 1.0.13, phrap SPS-4.24 |
| MIGS-32 | Gene calling method | Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP |
| INSDC ID | Not yet available | |
| Genbank Date of Release | Not yet available | |
| GOLD ID | Gi03023 | |
| NCBI project ID | 51139 | |
| Database: IMG-GEBA | 2506520049 | |
| MIGS-13 | Source material identifier | DSM 5205 |
| Project relevance | Tree of Life, GEBA |
Genome Statistics
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 4,691,711 | 100.00% |
| DNA coding region (bp) | 4,147,061 | 88.39% |
| DNA G+C content (bp) | 2,573,778 | 54.87% |
| Number of scaffolds | 4 | |
| Number of contigs | 15 | |
| Total genes | 4,594 | 100.00% |
| RNA genes | 52 | 1.15% |
| rRNA operons | 2 | |
| Protein-coding genes | 4,542 | 98.85% |
| Pseudo genes | 213 | 4.64% |
| Genes with function prediction | 2,918 | 63.52% |
| Genes in paralog clusters | 2,282 | 49.67% |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 3,275 | 71.29% |
| Genes assigned Pfam domains | 3,338 | 72.66% |
| Genes with signal peptides | 971 | 21.14% |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 1,027 | 22.36% |
| CRISPR repeats | 4 |
Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories
| | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 168 | 4.7 | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis |
| A | 3 | 0.1 | RNA processing and modification |
| K | 211 | 5.9 | Transcription |
| L | 276 | 7.7 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 1 | 0.0 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 48 | 1.3 | Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning |
| Y | 0 | 0.0 | Nuclear structure |
| V | 70 | 2.0 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 208 | 5.8 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 266 | 7.4 | Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis |
| N | 56 | 1.6 | Cell motility |
| Z | 0 | 0.0 | Cytoskeleton |
| W | 0 | 0.0 | Extracellular structures |
| U | 102 | 2.9 | Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport |
| O | 162 | 4.5 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 289 | 8.1 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 127 | 3.6 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 210 | 5.9 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 59 | 1.7 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 143 | 4.0 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 82 | 2.3 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 196 | 5.5 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 58 | 1.6 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 407 | 11.4 | General function prediction only |
| S | 437 | 12.2 | Function unknown |
| - | 1,319 | 28.7 | Not in COGs |