Literature DB >> 22675578

Draft genome sequence of strain HIMB100, a cultured representative of the SAR116 clade of marine Alphaproteobacteria.

Jana Grote, Cansu Bayindirli, Kristin Bergauer, Paula Carpintero de Moraes, Huan Chen, Lindsay D'Ambrosio, Bethanie Edwards, Beatriz Fernández-Gómez, Mariam Hamisi, Ramiro Logares, Dan Nguyen, Yoshimi M Rii, Emily Saeck, Charles Schutte, Brittany Widner, Matthew J Church, Grieg F Steward, David M Karl, Edward F Delong, John M Eppley, Stephan C Schuster, Nikos C Kyrpides, Michael S Rappé.   

Abstract

Strain HIMB100 is a planktonic marine bacterium in the class Alphaproteobacteria. This strain is of interest because it is one of the first known isolates from a globally ubiquitous clade of marine bacteria known as SAR116 within the family Rhodospirillaceae. Here we describe preliminary features of the organism, together with the draft genome sequence and annotation. This is the second genome sequence of a member of the SAR116 clade. The 2,458,945 bp genome contains 2,334 protein-coding and 42 RNA genes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rhodospirillaceae; SAR116; genome; marine bacterioplankton; proteorhodopsin

Year:  2011        PMID: 22675578      PMCID: PMC3368413          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1854551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

HIMB100 is a taxonomically uncharacterized marine bacterial strain isolated from surface seawater collected off the coast of Oahu, Hawaii in the subtropical Pacific Ocean [1]. It is of significant interest because it belongs to a 16S rRNA gene clade of marine Alphaproteobacteria known as SAR116, which was first described by Mullins et al. in 1995 [2] and has since been found to be widespread in the global surface ocean based on cultivation-independent surveys of marine bacterioplankton [3-9]. The first cultured strain of this clade was isolated from surface waters of the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Oregon, USA, in 2007 [10]. In 2010, the genome sequence of Candidatus Puniceispirillum marinum IMCC1322, a cultivated member of the SAR116 clade isolated from the East Sea in the Western Pacific Ocean (Sea of Japan), was reported [11]. Here we present a preliminary set of features for strain HIMB100 (Table 1), together with a description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation, as well as a preliminary comparative analysis with the complete genome of Candidatus P. marinum IMCC1322.
Table 1

Classification and general features of strain HIMB100 according to the MIGS recommendations [12]

MIGS ID    Property     Term   Evidence code
    Current classification     Domain Bacteria   TAS [13]
     Phylum Proteobacteria   TAS [14]
     Class Alphaproteobacteria   TAS [15,16]
     Order Rhodospirillales   TAS [17,18]
     Family Rhodospirillaceae   TAS [17,18]
     Genus not assigned
     Species not assigned
     Type strain HIMB100   IDA
    Gram stain     negative   NAS
    Cell shape     spiral-shaped   IDA
    Motility     unknown
    Sporulation     non-sporulating   NAS
    Temperature range     mesophilic   IDA
    Optimum temperature     unknown
    Carbon source     ambient seawater DOC   TAS [1]
    Energy source     chemoorganoheterotrophic   NAS
MIGS-6    Habitat     sea water
MIGS-6.3    Salinity     ~35.0 ‰   NAS
MIGS-22    Oxygen     aerobic   NAS
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship     free-living   TAS [1]
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity     none   NAS
MIGS-4    Geographic location     Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, subtropical Pacific Ocean   TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time     18 May 2005   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1    Latitude     21.44   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.2    Longitude     -157.78   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.3    Depth     ~1 m   TAS [1]

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19]. If the evidence code is IDA, the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19]. If the evidence code is IDA, the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Classification and features

Strain HIMB100 was isolated by a high-throughput, dilution-to-extinction approach [20] from seawater collected off the coast of Hawaii, USA, in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean, and bore an identical 16S rRNA gene sequence to three other isolates obtained from the same study [1]. All four strains were isolated in seawater sterilized by tangential flow filtration and amended with low concentrations of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus (1.0 µM NH4Cl, 1.0 µM NaNO3, and 0.1 µM KH2PO4). Repeated attempts to cultivate the isolates on solidified culture media or in artificial seawater media failed. In addition, preliminary attempts have failed to identify amendments to the seawater-based culture medium that would increase the abundance of cells in culture above ca. 1 ×106 cells ml-1. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons revealed strain HIMB100 to be closely related to a large number of environmental gene clones obtained almost exclusively from seawater. For example, alignment of HIMB100 against the Silva release 104 reference database (512,037 high quality bacterial 16S rRNA sequences >1200 base pairs in length, released October 2010) revealed 554 entries that belong to the same phylogenetic lineage within the Alphaproteobacteria. Of these, only one originated from a cultivated isolate (Candidatus P. marinum IMCC1322), and all 554 entries derived from either seawater or the marine environment. The 16S rRNA gene sequence from Oregon coast strain HTCC8037 was 98.0% similar to that of strain HIMB100, but it does not appear in the Silva reference database because it is a partial sequence of 884 nucleotides in length [10]. In phylogenetic analyses with taxonomically described members of the Alphaproteobacteria, strain HIMB100 and Candidatus P. marinum IMCC1322 (94.1% similar) formed a monophyletic lineage within the family Rhodospirillaceae (Figure 1). The 16S rRNA gene of strain HIMB100 was most similar to the type strains of Nisaea denitrificans (90.3%), N. nitritireducens (89.9%), and Thalassobaculum salexigens (89.3%), which were all isolated from surface seawater of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea [25,26], T. litoreum (89.5%), isolated from coastal seawater off of Korea [27], and Oceanibaculum indicum (89.4%), isolated from a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading consortium that was enriched from a deep-seawater sample collected from the Indian Ocean [28].
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree based comparisons between 16S rRNA gene sequences from strain HIMB100, Candidatus Puniceispirillum marinum IMCC1322, and type strains of related species within the family Rhodospirillaceae. Sequence selection and alignment improvements were carried out using the ‘All-Species Living Tree’ project database [21] and the ARB software package [22]. The tree was inferred from 1,206 alignment positions using the RAxML maximum likelihood method [23]. Support values from 100 bootstrap replicates, determined by RAxML [24], are displayed above branches if larger than 60%. The scale bar indicates substitutions per site.

Phylogenetic tree based comparisons between 16S rRNA gene sequences from strain HIMB100, Candidatus Puniceispirillum marinum IMCC1322, and type strains of related species within the family Rhodospirillaceae. Sequence selection and alignment improvements were carried out using the ‘All-Species Living Tree’ project database [21] and the ARB software package [22]. The tree was inferred from 1,206 alignment positions using the RAxML maximum likelihood method [23]. Support values from 100 bootstrap replicates, determined by RAxML [24], are displayed above branches if larger than 60%. The scale bar indicates substitutions per site. Cells of strain HIMB100 are long, thin spiral-shaped rods (0.3 x 1-5 μm) when in exponential growth (Figure 2). Because it is able to grow in media consisting solely of sterile seawater with added inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in the light or dark, HIMB100 is presumed to grow chemoheterotrophically by oxidizing compounds in the dissolved organic carbon pool of natural seawater. A summary of other known preliminary features is shown in Table 1.
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of strain HIMB100. Scale bar corresponds to 1 μm.

Scanning electron micrograph of strain HIMB100. Scale bar corresponds to 1 μm.

Chemotaxonomy

No cellular fatty acids profiles are currently available for strain HIMB100, nor have any been reported for other cultivated members of the SAR116 clade.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

Strain HIMB100 was selected for sequencing because of its phylogenetic affiliation with a widespread lineage of marine bacteria that is significantly underrepresented in culture collections. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) as project Gi06671, and the complete genome sequence in GenBank as accession number AFXB00000000 [Table 2]. A summary of the main project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property    Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality    Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used    one standard 454 pyrosequence titanium library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms    454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2   Fold coverage    132 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30   Assemblers    Newbler version 2.3
MIGS-32   Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
   Genbank ID    AFXB00000000
   Genbank Date of Release    November 10, 2011
   GOLD ID    Gi0667
   Database: IMG    2503113005
   NCBI taxon ID    281031
MIGS-13   Source material identifier    HIMB100
   Project relevance    environmental

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Strain HIMB100 was grown at 27° C in 50 L of coastal Hawaii seawater sterilized by tangential flow filtration [1] and supplemented with (final concentration) 10 µM NH4Cl, 1.0 µM KH2PO4, 1.0 µM L-serine, 1.0 µM L-methionine, 10 mM FeCl3, 0.1 µM betaine, 0.001% (wt/vol) of D-ribose, D-glucose, succinic acid, pyruvic acid, glycerol, and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, 0.002% (vol/vol) ethanol, and Va vitamin mix at a 10-3 dilution [20]. Cells from the liquid culture were collected on a membrane filter, and DNA was isolated from the microbial biomass using a standard phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol extraction protocol. A total of ca. 12 μg of DNA was obtained.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of strain HIMB100 was sequenced at the Pennsylvania State University Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics (University Park, PA, USA) using the 454 GS FLX Ti platform of 454 Life Sciences (Branford, CT, USA). The sequencing library was prepared according to the 454 instructions from genomic DNA of strain HIMB100. Sequencing was carried out on a full 454 picotiter plate, yielding 1,342,353 reads with an average length of 415 bp, totaling 556 Mbp. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.3, resulting in 10 contigs of 2,458,945 bp. Sequencing provided 132 × coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [29] as part of the genome annotation pipeline in the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) system [30]. The predicted coding sequences were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [31] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using the tool RNAmmer [32]. Other non-coding RNAs were identified by searching the genome for the Rfam profiles using INFERNAL (v0.81) [33]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within IMG-ER.

Genome properties

The genome is 2,458,945 bp long and comprises 10 contigs ranging in size from 30,717 to 1,167490 bp, with an overall GC content of 50.48 % (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,376 genes predicted, 2,334 were protein coding genes, and 42 were RNAs. Most protein coding genes (82.0%) were assigned putative functions, while the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COG functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome statistics

Attribute   Value    % of totala
Genome size (bp)   2,458,945    100.00
DNA coding region (bp)   2,260,613    91.91
DNA G+C content (bp)   1,241,171    50.48
Total genes   2,376    100.00
RNA genes   42    1.77
Protein-coding genes   2,334    98.23
Genes with function prediction   1,948    81.99
Genes assigned to COGs   1,873    78.83
Genes assigned to Pfam domains   1,957    82.37
Genes with signal peptides   733    30.43
Genes with transmembrane helices   504    21.21

a) The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Figure 3

Graphic circular map of the HIMB100 genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. The 10 contigs of the draft genome are ordered randomly.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code   Value   %agea    Description
J   142   6.8    Translation
A   0   0    RNA processing and modification
K   77   3.7    Transcription
L   93   4.5    Replication, recombination and repair
B   2   0.1    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   20   1.0    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y   0   0    Nuclear structure
V   16   0.8    Defense mechanisms
T   41   2.0    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   142   6.8    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N   41   2.0    Cell motility
Z   0   0    Cytoskeleton
W   0   0    Extracellular structures
U   40   1.9    Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O   89   4.3    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   149   7.1    Energy production and conversion
G   126   6.0    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   250   12.0    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   58   2.8    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   117   5.6    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   113   5.4    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   70   3.4    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   78   3.7    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   271   13.0    General function prediction only
S   155   7.4    Function unknown
-   503   21.2    Not in COGs

a) The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

a) The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome. Graphic circular map of the HIMB100 genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. The 10 contigs of the draft genome are ordered randomly. a) The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Genome comparisons with IMCC1322

The genome of one other member of the SAR116 clade, Candidatus P. marinum IMCC1322, was recently sequenced [11]. This genome is 2,753,527 bp in length (295 Kbp longer than HIMB100), arranged in a single chromosome, and possesses a G + C content similar to that of HIMB100 (48.85% vs. 50.48%). Although the genome of Candidatus P. marinum IMCC1322 is annotated with over 200 more genes than HIMB100 (2,582 genes vs. 2,376), it only encodes for 51 additional protein-coding genes with predicted function. The predicted metabolic potentials encoded by the two genomes have many features in common. The genomes of both strains possess a lesion in the Embden-Meyerhoff-Parnas pathway in that they lack the enzyme 6-phosphofructokinase. However, the genomes of both strains possess two key enzymes of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway, phosphogluconate dehydratase and 2-keto-3-deoxy-phosphogluconate aldolase. The oxidative portion of the pentose phosphate pathway is incomplete in both strains; the genome of HIMB100 lacks a recognizable 6-phosphogluconolactonase, while the genomes of both strains lack a recognizable 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase. In addition, several genes of predicted biogeochemical importance are present in both strains, including proteorhodopsin and carotenoid biosynthesis genes, carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) demethylase, and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) reductase. Genes for assimilatory sulfate reduction are incomplete in both genomes, and so it is hypothesized that exogenous reduced sulfur compounds, such as DMSP and DMSO, are likely to fill the requirement of sulfur for cellular growth. The genomes of both strains possess a high affinity inorganic phosphate transport system (pstSCAB), and encode a phosphate regulon sensor (phoU), phosphate starvation-inducible protein (phoH), and the phosphate regulon consisting of the phoB-phoR two-component system. Both genomes encode for ABC transporters for iron, glycine betaine/proline, zinc, sorbitol/mannitol, amino acids (branched-chain and general L-amino acids), sulfonate/nitrate/taurine and a heme exporter. Thiamine and alpha-glucoside transport systems were only identified within the genome of strain HIMB100, while ribose and putrescine transport systems were only identified within the genome of Candidatus P. marinum IMCC1322. Finally, two operons of potential ecological relevance show different distributions within the two genomes: the genome of strain HIMB100 possesses a seven-gene operon encoding all of the subunits and accessory proteins for urease that is completely lacking in the genome of Candidatus P. marinum IMCC1322, while the genome of Candidatus P. marinum IMCC1322 possesses 21 genes for cobalamin biosynthesis that are absent from the genome of strain HIMB100.
  25 in total

1.  ARB: a software environment for sequence data.

Authors:  Wolfgang Ludwig; Oliver Strunk; Ralf Westram; Lothar Richter; Harald Meier; Arno Buchner; Tina Lai; Susanne Steppi; Gangolf Jobb; Wolfram Förster; Igor Brettske; Stefan Gerber; Anton W Ginhart; Oliver Gross; Silke Grumann; Stefan Hermann; Ralf Jost; Andreas König; Thomas Liss; Ralph Lüssmann; Michael May; Björn Nonhoff; Boris Reichel; Robert Strehlow; Alexandros Stamatakis; Norbert Stuckmann; Alexander Vilbig; Michael Lenke; Thomas Ludwig; Arndt Bode; Karl-Heinz Schleifer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Complete genome sequence of "Candidatus Puniceispirillum marinum" IMCC1322, a representative of the SAR116 clade in the Alphaproteobacteria.

Authors:  Hyun-Myung Oh; Kae Kyoung Kwon; Ilnam Kang; Sung Gyun Kang; Jung-Hyun Lee; Sang-Jin Kim; Jang-Cheon Cho
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean's interior.

Authors:  Edward F DeLong; Christina M Preston; Tracy Mincer; Virginia Rich; Steven J Hallam; Niels-Ulrik Frigaard; Asuncion Martinez; Matthew B Sullivan; Robert Edwards; Beltran Rodriguez Brito; Sallie W Chisholm; David M Karl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Improvements of high-throughput culturing yielded novel SAR11 strains and other abundant marine bacteria from the Oregon coast and the Bermuda Atlantic Time Series study site.

Authors:  Ulrich Stingl; Harry James Tripp; Stephen J Giovannoni
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Nisaea denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov. and Nisaea nitritireducens sp. nov., two novel members of the class Alphaproteobacteria from the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Laurent Urios; Valérie Michotey; Laurent Intertaglia; Françoise Lesongeur; Philippe Lebaron
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Thalassobaculum litoreum gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Rhodospirillaceae isolated from coastal seawater.

Authors:  Gwang I Zhang; Chung Y Hwang; Byung C Cho
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Diversity of free-living and attached bacteria in offshore Western Mediterranean waters as depicted by analysis of genes encoding 16S rRNA.

Authors:  S G Acinas; J Antón; F Rodríguez-Valera
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes.

Authors:  Sam Griffiths-Jones; Simon Moxon; Mhairi Marshall; Ajay Khanna; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  14 in total

1.  Expansion of Cultured Bacterial Diversity by Large-Scale Dilution-to-Extinction Culturing from a Single Seawater Sample.

Authors:  Seung-Jo Yang; Ilnam Kang; Jang-Cheon Cho
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Genome Reconstruction from Metagenomic Data Sets Reveals Novel Microbes in the Brackish Waters of the Caspian Sea.

Authors:  Maliheh Mehrshad; Mohammad Ali Amoozegar; Rohit Ghai; Seyed Abolhassan Shahzadeh Fazeli; Francisco Rodriguez-Valera
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Genome of a SAR116 bacteriophage shows the prevalence of this phage type in the oceans.

Authors:  Ilnam Kang; Hyun-Myung Oh; Dongmin Kang; Jang-Cheon Cho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evolutionary origin of a streamlined marine bacterioplankton lineage.

Authors:  Haiwei Luo
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Metabolic evolution and the self-organization of ecosystems.

Authors:  Rogier Braakman; Michael J Follows; Sallie W Chisholm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Isolation, cultivation, and genome analysis of proteorhodopsin-containing SAR116-clade strain Candidatus Puniceispirillum marinum IMCC1322.

Authors:  Junhak Lee; Kae Kyoung Kwon; Seung-Il Lim; Jaeho Song; Ah Reum Choi; Sung-Hyun Yang; Kwang-Hwan Jung; Jung-Hyun Lee; Sung Gyun Kang; Hyun-Myung Oh; Jang-Cheon Cho
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  Microbial Gene Abundance and Expression Patterns across a River to Ocean Salinity Gradient.

Authors:  Caroline S Fortunato; Byron C Crump
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Single-cell genomics-based analysis of virus-host interactions in marine surface bacterioplankton.

Authors:  Jessica M Labonté; Brandon K Swan; Bonnie Poulos; Haiwei Luo; Sergey Koren; Steven J Hallam; Matthew B Sullivan; Tanja Woyke; K Eric Wommack; Ramunas Stepanauskas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Expanding the World of Marine Bacterial and Archaeal Clades.

Authors:  Pelin Yilmaz; Pablo Yarza; Josephine Z Rapp; Frank O Glöckner
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Inter-domain microbial diversity within the coral holobiont Siderastrea siderea from two depth habitats.

Authors:  Daniel G Merselis; Katherine E Dougan; Guido Bonthond; Trevor Graff; William Todd; James W Fourqurean; Mauricio Rodriguez-Lanetty
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.