| Literature DB >> 22672720 |
João Neiva1, Gareth A Pearson, Myriam Valero, Ester A Serrão.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Factors promoting the emergence of sharp phylogeographic breaks include restricted dispersal, habitat discontinuity, physical barriers, disruptive selection, mating incompatibility, genetic surfing and secondary contact. Disentangling the role of each in any particular system can be difficult, especially when species are evenly distributed across transition zones and dispersal barriers are not evident. The estuarine seaweed Fucus ceranoides provides a good example of highly differentiated populations along its most persistent distributional range at the present rear edge of the species distribution, in NW Iberia. Intrinsic dispersal restrictions are obvious in this species, but have not prevented F. ceranoides from vastly expanding its range northwards following the last glaciation, implying that additional factors are responsible for the lack of connectivity between neighbouring southern populations. In this study we analyze 22 consecutive populations of F. ceranoides along NW Iberia to investigate the processes generating and maintaining the observed high levels of regional genetic divergence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22672720 PMCID: PMC3483196 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-78
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Genetic diversity of within sampling sites and inferred genetic sectors
| Lima, Viana do Castelo | VIA | 16 | 2.43 | 0.154 | 0.143 | 0.077 | A | A1(14), GQ385159*, GQ385159* | 3 | 242 | 50 |
| | |||||||||||
| Verdugo (Ria de Vigo), Arcade | VIG | 16 | 3.57 | 0.223 | 0.223 | −0.001 | A | A1(11), A3(3), A4, A5 | 4 | 517 | 116 |
| Lérez (Ria de Pontevedra), Pontevedra | PON | 16 | 2.29 | 0.174 | 0.161 | 0.080 | A | A1(13), A6, A7, A8 | 4 | 242 | 50 |
| Umia (Ria de Arousa), Cambados | UMI | 16 | 2,86 | 0.225 | 0.174 | 0.231* | A | A1, A2(5), A9(3), A10 (2), A11, A12(2), A13, A14 | 8 | 875 | 580 |
| Ulla (Ria de Arousa), Catoira | ULL | 16 | 2,71 | 0.144 | 0.146 | −0.012 | A | A1, A2(9), A15(2), A16, A17, A18, A19 | 7 | 692 | 267 |
| Tabra/Tambre (Ria de Muros e Noia), Noia | NOI | 16 | 3.00 | 0.357 | 0.370 | −0.039 | A | A1(11), A20(5) | 2 | 458 | 92 |
| Xallas (Ria de Córcubion), Ézaro | XAL | 16 | 3.71 | 0.478 | 0.369 | 0.234* | A | A1 (5), A21(9), A22, A23 | 4 | 617 | 151 |
| Castro, Lires | LIR | 16 | 3.29 | 0.447 | 0.324 | 0.282* | A | A1 (11), A24, A25, A26, A27, A28 | 6 | 350 | 104 |
| Grande (Ria das Camariñas), Ponte do Porto | CAM | 16 | 3.43 | 0.430 | 0.279 | 0.360* | A | A1(10), A29(4), A30, A31 | 4 | 575 | 151 |
| | |||||||||||
| Anllóns (Ria de Corme e Laxe), Ponteceso | ANL | 16 | 3.57 | 0.482 | 0.482 | 0.001 | B | B2 (13), B3(2), B4 | 3 | 342 | 72 |
| Mero (Ria de A Coruña), O Temple | RCO | 16 | 4.00 | 0.355 | 0.304 | 0.150* | B | B1 (10), B5(3), B6(2), B7 | 4 | 592 | 203 |
| Mendo/Mandeo (Ria de Betanzos), Betanzos | BET | 16 | 3.14 | 0.364 | 0.265 | 0.277* | B | B1(7), B8 (9) | 2 | 525 | 106 |
| Eume (Ria de Ares), Pontedeume | ARE | 16 | 4.00 | 0.408 | 0.342 | 0.166* | B | B1(14), B9, B10 | 3 | 242 | 50 |
| Xuvia (Ria do Ferrol), Neda | FER | 16 | 3.71 | 0.458 | 0.368 | 0.203* | B | B1(16) | 1 | – | – |
| Ferrerias (Ria de Cedeira) | CED | 16 | 3.00 | 0.398 | 0.200 | 0.505* | B | B2(15), B11 | 2 | 125 | 25 |
| | |||||||||||
| Mera (Ria de Ortigueira), Ponte de Mera | ORT | 16 | 3.00 | 0.468 | 0.362 | 0.232* | B, C | B1(2), C1(12), C2, C9 | 4 | 442 | 323 |
| Sor (Ria de Barquero), Poceira | BAR | 16 | 3.14 | 0.563 | 0.411 | 0.277* | B, C | B1, C1(14), C3 | 3 | 133 | 113 |
| Landro (Ria de Viveiros), Viveiros | VIV | 16 | 3.57 | 0.484 | 0.473 | 0.022 | C | C1(15), C4 | 2 | 125 | 25 |
| Ouro | FAZ | 16 | 3.43 | 0.497 | 0.500 | −0.007 | C | C1(15), C5 | 2 | 125 | 25 |
| Masma (Ria da Foz) | FOZ | 16 | 3.57 | 0.507 | 0.427 | 0.162* | C | C1(16) | 1 | – | – |
| Eo (Ria de Ribadeo), Vegadeo | VEG | 16 | 3.71 | 0.416 | 0.414 | 0.005 | C | C1(15), C6 | 2 | 125 | 25 |
| Porcia | POR | 16 | 3.00 | 0.463 | 0.527 | −0.144 | C | C1(15), C7 | 2 | 125 | 25 |
| Navia (Ria de Navia), Navia | NAV | 16 | 3.71 | 0.464 | 0.413 | 0.114 | C | C1(15), C8 | 2 | 125 | 25 |
| Valdediós (Ria de Villaviciosa) | VIL | 16 | 3.00 | 0.464 | 0.464 | 0.000 | C | C1(10), GQ385159*(5), GQ385159* | 3 | 542 | 117 |
| Asón (Ria de Santoña), Colindres | SAN | 16 | 3.14 | 0.410 | 0.411 | −0.003 | C | GQ385159*(9), GQ385159*(7) | 2 | 525 | 105 |
| Adour, Bayonne | BAY | 16 | 3.43 | 0.486 | 0.446 | 0.083 | C | C1(13), GQ385159*(2), GQ385159* | 3 | 342 | 72 |
Mean allelic richness (A), Nei’s gene diversity (HE), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and multi-locus inbreeding coefficient (FIS,) were estimated from for the microsatellite data-set; Haplotypic richness (Nhap), haplotypic diversity (Hhap) and nucleotide diversity (πhap) are based on the mtIGS data-set. The mtIGS lineages and haplotypes are listed for each population (coded as in Figure 1). Absolute frequencies of haplotypes are in parenthesis (if N > 1). *GenBank accessions of the private haplotypes of the populations of VIA, VIL, SAN and BAY [15].
Figure 1Genealogy and distribution of the mtIGS haplotypes of from NW Iberia. (a) Location of the study area (in black) in relation to Europe and the Iberian Peninsula. The geographical location and mtIGS lineages present in four Iberian populations previously analysed in Neiva et al. (2010, 2012) are also shown. (b) MtIGS parsimony networks of NW Iberian haplotypes. Sampled haplotypes are represented by circles sized to their frequency and black dots represent inferred, unsampled haplotypes. Links represent a single nucleotide change and black squares represent small indels. Inferred phylogroups are labelled by colour and letter (A-Red; B-Purple; C-Green). Shared and private haplotypes are depicted in bright and pale colour intensity, respectively. (c) Location of sampling sites, delimitation of the phylogeographic sectors considered (Western- W; Northwestern- NW; Northern- N). Pie charts depict haplotype frequencies at each site (see Table 1 for haplotype ID’s, haplotypes are coloured as in b)
Figure 2MtIGS phylogeny and genealogic congruence in Iberian (a) 50% majority-rule consensus tree of mtIGS haplotypes of F. ceranoides, rooted with F. vesiculosus. Numbers above the branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities (> 0.70). Inferred phylogroups are highlighted in grey. (b) FCA plot based on individual multilocus genotypes. Individuals are labelled according to their mtIGS lineage. Note the correspondence between the mtIGS phylogeny and the nuclear population structure. The individuals from VIA, VIL, SAN and BAY were included in both analyses.
Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) between and among NW Iberian genetic sectors of
| 3 Sectors | 352 | Among groups | 2 | 83.07 | ΦCT = 0.831* |
| Among populations within groups | 19 | 5.55 | ΦSC = 0.328* | ||
| Among populations | 330 | 11.38 | | ||
| W Sector | 128 | Among populations | 7 | 32.01 | ΦST = 0.320* |
| Within populations | 120 | 67.99 | | ||
| NW Sector | 96 | Among populations | 5 | 63.44 | ΦST = 0.634* |
| Within populations | 90 | 36.56 | | ||
| N Sector | 128 | Among populations | 7 | 2.24 | ΦST = 0.023 |
| Within populations | 120 | 97.76 |
P values are based on 1000 permutations.
*P > 0.05.
Figure 3Mismatch distributions of the mtIGS phylogroups A, B and C of The grey bars and the solid lines depict the observed and expected (under the spatial expansion model) values, respectively.
Figure 4Genetic subdivision of Iberian based on STRUCTURE. Shown are the proportions of individual multilocus genotypes assigned to each of K virtual clusters, as illustrated by the different colours. The individuals from VIA, VIL, SAN and BAY were also included. Population codes are given in Table 1.
Figure 5Isolation by distance in from NW Iberia. Estimates of pairwise differentiation (F ST/1-FST) are plotted against geographic distance for (a) NW Iberia (b) W sector, (c) NW sector and (d) N sector. The regressions are: y = 0,0045x + 0,1134), y = 0,0056x + 0,0934, y = −0,0006x + 0,3652 and y = 0,0023x + 0,0543, respectively.