MGMT, GATA6, CD81, DR4, and CASP8 gene promoter methylation in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Methylation of promoter region is the major mechanism affecting gene expression in tumors. Recent methylome studies of brain tumors revealed a list of new epigenetically modified genes. Our aim was to study promoter methylation of newly identified epigenetically silenced genes together with already known epigenetic markers and evaluate its separate and concomitant role in glioblastoma genesis and patient outcome.
METHODS: The methylation status of MGMT, CD81, GATA6, DR4, and CASP8 in 76 patients with primary glioblastomas was investigated. Methylation-specific PCR reaction was performed using bisulfite treated DNA. Evaluating glioblastoma patient survival time after operation, patient data and gene methylation effect on survival was estimated using survival analysis.
RESULTS: The overwhelming majority (97.3%) of tumors were methylated in at least one of five genes tested. In glioblastoma specimens gene methylation was observed as follows: MGMT in 51.3%, GATA6 in 68.4%, CD81 in 46.1%, DR4 in 41.3% and CASP8 in 56.8% of tumors. Methylation of MGMT was associated with younger patient age (p < 0.05), while CASP8 with older (p < 0.01). MGMT methylation was significantly more frequent event in patient group who survived longer than 36 months after operation (p < 0.05), while methylation of CASP8 was more frequent in patients who survived shorter than 36 months (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed patient age, treatment, MGMT, GATA6 and CASP8 as independent predictors for glioblastoma patient outcome (p < 0.05). MGMT and GATA6 were independent predictors for patient survival in younger patients' group, while there were no significant associations observed in older patients' group when adjusted for therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: High methylation frequency of tested genes shows heterogeneity of glioblastoma epigenome and the importance of MGMT, GATA6 and CASP8 genes methylation in glioblastoma patient outcome.

Background

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive astrocytic tumor of the central nervous system in adults. It is characterized by various genetic alterations, affecting genes that control cell growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and invasion. Epigenetic alterations also affect the expression of cancer genes alone or in combination with genetic mechanisms. Cytosine methylation of CpG dinucleotides in gene promoters is a common cause of DNA silencing and transcriptional repression that can modulate clinical features of globlastoma. The best known is O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation determining tumors response to DNA alkylating agents and being an independent prognostic factor for patient survival [1]. However, several widely described genes can be seen as only a partial picture of the methylation changes, there may be many more genes that need to be clarified. Recent methylome studies of brain tumors have disclosed a list of new epigenetically modified genes associated with gliomagenesis and different glioma clusters [2-4]. The latter studies illustrate glioblastoma profile being constructed via methylation of a multiple set of genes, forming networks attributed to different pathogenesis pathways. It has been suggested that in glioblastoma, highly methylated genes, such as CD81 (CD81 antigen), DR4 (death receptor 4, TRAIL receptor 1) and GATA6 (GATA binding protein 6), participating in cell adhesion, apoptosis, and proliferation [3] could be important in gliomagenesis. Newly obtained influence of GATA6 hypermethylation on glioblastoma patient survival in a small group of tumors was shown as a promising marker in prognostic purposes [3]. To further study the importance of promoter methylation of newly identified epigenetically silenced genes (GATA6CD81) and revealing its relationship with already known epigenetic markers (MGMTDR4CASP8 (caspase-8)) could help to better understand glioblastoma biology. In the first part of the study we have reported promoter methylation of MGMTGATA6CD81DR4, and CASP8 genes. In the second part we have analyzed gene methylation correlations with patient variables. And in the third part we have analyzed whether the methylation status of five genes separately or in clusters are independent predictors for patient outcome.

Methods

Patient sample

The methylation profile of the MGMTGATA6CD81DR4, and CASP8 genes in 76 patients with WHO grade IV glioblastomas was investigated. All glioblastomas were graded and classified according to the 2007 WHO classification criteria [5]. Tissue samples were collected from the Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, from 2003 to 2009. The ethics committee of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences and the Lithuanian Bioethics Committee approved the collection and use of human brain tumor tissue samples. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the surgery. Survival time was collected for all cases and calculated from the time of surgery to death or censor.

Methylation-specific PCR

Brain tumor tissue specimens after dissection were snap-frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis. Tumor DNA was extracted using ZR Genomic DNA™-Tissue MiniPrep (Zymo Research, USA) from 25-40 mg of frozen tissue according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The methylation status of MGMTCD81GATA6DR4, and CASP8 gene promoters was determined by bisulfite treatment of DNA. An amount of 400 ng of DNA was used for bisulfite modification. DNA modification was done using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research, USA), and all the procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Bisulfite-treated DNA was eluted in 40 μL distilled water and stored in –80 °C until PCR. Normal human blood lymphocyte DNA treated with bisulfite served as a negative control. As a positive control, standard Bisulfite Converted Universal Methylated Human DNA Standard (Zymo Research, USA) was used. Promoter methylation was detected by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Each MSP reaction incorporated approximately 20 ng of bisulfite-treated DNA as a template. Specific for methylated and unmethylated DNA sequence primers are listed in Table 1 and were obtained from published data (for MGMT[6], CD81[7], GATA6[8], DR4[9], and CASP8[10]). PCR reaction was performed in a total volume of 20 μL, using 10 μL Maxima® Hot Start PCR Master Mix with Hot Start Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and 10 μM of each primer (Metabion International AG, Germany). MSP was performed for 38-40 cycles with start of 95 °C for 1 min, annealing for 1 min at temperature appropriate for an individual gene, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. Amplification products were loaded on 2% agarose gels with ethidium bromide and after electrophoresis documented under UV. In a case of both, methylated and unmethylated signals appearance in a gel, methylation of the gene was considered.

Table 1

Primers for methylation-specific PCR

Gene	Forward primer 5´– 3´	Reverse primer 5´ – 3´	Tm
MGMT-M	TTTCGACGTTCGTAGGTTTTCGC	GCACTCTTCCGAAAACGAAACG	64
MGMT-U	TTTGTGTTTTGATGTTTGTAGGTTTTTGT	AACTCCACACTCTTCCAAAAACAAAACA	62
CD81-M	CGACGGCGGCGATTTTATCGC	GACCTACGAAACGCGAACCG	58
CD81-U	GTGATGGTGGTGATTTTATTGT	ACAACCTACAAAACACAAACCAA	58
GATA6-M	CGGGGTAGATTTCGGATTCGC	CAACCGAACCTCGAACGAACG	60
GATA6-U	GTGTGGGGTAGATTTTGGATTTGT	AAACAACCAAACCTCAAACAAACA	60
DR4-M	TTCGAATTTCGGGAGCGTAGC	GTAATTCAATCCTCCCCGCGA	60
DR4-U	GTAGTGATTTTGAATTTTGGGAGTGTAGT	CTCATAATTCAATCCCCACAA	60
CASP8-M	TAGGGGATTCGGAGATTGCGA	CGTATATCTACATTCGAAACGA	58
CASP8-U	TAGGGGATTTGGAGATTGTGA	CCATATATATCTACATTCAAAACAA	58

M = methylated, U = unmethylated, Tm = melting temperature.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out with the software of IBM SPSS Statistics 19 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Quantitative data presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). To show the reliability of the estimate, the confidence interval (CI) with 95% confidence level was presented. For testing the statistical hypothesis the significance level of 0.05 was selected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival functions. For comparison of survival between two groups, the log-rank and generalized Wilcoxon tests were used. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was applied to determine independent variables and prognosis relative hazard. For comparing means of two groups the independent samples t test was used. For testing statistical hypothesis about the independence of two variables, the chi-square test was used.

Results

Glioblastoma patient data

The mean age at diagnosis was 61.2 years (range: 34-88; SD: 12.3 years). The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.5. The mean age of male (n = 30) and female (n = 46) patients was 59.9 years (SD: 13.3 years) and 62 years (SD: 11.6 years), respectively.

The mean survival of patients with glioblastoma (n = 76) was 14.6 months (range: 0.26-52.60 months), while the median survival was 7.7 months (95% CI: 4.81-10.6 months). The survival rate at 12 and 24 months was 34.2% (95% CI: 23.7%-46.0%) and 22.4% (95% CI: 13.6%-33.4%), respectively.

As expected, it was observed glioblastoma patient survival association with age and adjuvant treatment (log-rank test, P = 0.001). The median survival of patients aged <60 years and ≥60 years was 15.6 and 4.5 months, respectively. Radiotherapy (RT) alone and RT plus concomitant chemotherapy (temozolomide) (RT + TMZ) were used for the postoperative treatment of glioblastomas in our study. RT alone was administered in 85.3% (n = 58) of cases and RT + TMZ was used in 14.7% (n = 10) of cases. Eight patients did not receive postoperative treatment due to their critical condition. The median survival for patients treated with RT + TMZ versus RT alone was 42.2 months (95% CI: 13.19-71.18 months) and 7.7 months (95% CI: 4.34-11.04 months).

Frequency of gene methylation and co-methylation in glioblastoma

The overwhelming majority (97.3%) of tumors were methylated in at least one of five genes tested. Only 2.7% of glioblastomas had no detectable gene methylation, and 4.1% had concomitant methylation of all five genes tested. Methylation frequencies were 51.3% (n = 76) for MGMT, 68.4% (n = 76) for GATA6, 46.1% (n = 76) for CD81, 41.3% (n = 75) for DR4, and 56.0% (n = 75) for CASP8. Representative methylation-specific PCR for the mentioned genes is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative methylation specific PCR reaction forandgenes. U represents amplification of unmethylated allele, and M represents methylated allele. Standard Bisulfite Converted Universal Methylated Human DNA (SMD) and normal human peripheral lymphocytes (NL) served as positive and negative methylation controls, respectively. MW – molecular weight. H2O – water control. GBM#1-6 glioblastoma patient tumor samples.

Despite the frequent co-methylation of two genes in the same tissue varying from about 15% to 37%, no significant associations in the frequencies of gene methylation were documented (chi-square test, P > 0.05).

Associations between gene methylation and co-methylation, and patient data

Methylation of MGMT was associated with younger patient age at diagnosis (chi-square test, P = 0.039), while methylation of CASP8 more often was observed in older patients (chi-square test, P = 0.002) (Table 2). When grouping patients according to survival time, it was shown that MGMT gene methylation was significantly more frequent event in patient group who survived longer than 36 months after diagnosis (chi-square test, P = 0.031 and P = 0.006, respectively), while CASP8 and DR4 gene methylation was more frequent event in patient group who survived up to 36 months (chi-square test, P = 0.035 and P = 0.061 respectively) (Table 2). GATA6 and CASP8 methylation in older patients were significantly associated with co-unmethylated MGMT (chi-square test, P = 0.021 and P = 0.003 respectively). Of the patients older than 60 years who lacked MGMT promoter methylation, 45.5% and 44.2% showed concomitant aberrant GATA6 and CASP8 methylation respectively. GATA6 methylation in older patients was significantly associated with co-methylated CASP8 and DR4 (28% and 24.9%, chi-square test, P = 0.005 and P = 0.039 respectively), as well as CASP8 methylation with co-methylated DR4 (34.9%) (chi-square test, P = 0.017).

Table 2

Associations between demographic and clinical data of patients and methylation of five genes

Characteristic	n	MGMT			GATA6			CD81			CASP8			DR4
		U (%)	M (%)	P	U (%)	M (%)	P	U (%)	M (%)	P	U (%)	M (%)	P	U (%)	M (%)	P
Age
<60 years	32	14.5	27.6	0.039	15.8	26.3	0.454	22.4	19.7	1.000	28.0	14.7	0.002	26.7	14.7	0.477
≥60 years	44	34.2	23.7		15.8	42.1		31.6	26.3		16.0	41.3		32.0	26.7
Sex
Male	30	56.7	43.3	0.348	33.3	66.7	0.806	53.3	46.7	1.000	37.9	62.1	0.477	50.0	50.0	0.239
Female	46	43.5	56.5		30.4	69.6		54.3	45.7		47.8	52.2		64.4	34.6
Survival
<36 months	62	56.5	43.5	0.006	30.6	69.4	0.775	54.8	45.2	0.774	37.7	62.3	0.035	53.2	46.8	0.061
≥36 months	14	14.3	85.7		35.7	64.3		50.0	50.0		71.4	28.6		84.6	15.4

n – number of patients, U = unmethylated, M = methylated.

Associations between gene methylation and patient survival

Figure 2 shows the associations between the methylation of five gene promoters and patient survival. The methylation of the MGMT promoter was associated with longer survival (log-rank test, P = 0.005) (Figure 2A). The median survival in the methylated and unmethylated MGMT groups was 9.9 months and 6.2 months, respectively (Table 3). The 12- and 24-month survival rates for methylated versus unmethylated MGMT cases were 46.2% (95% CI: 30.1%-62.8%) and 33.3% (95% CI: 19.1%-50.2%) versus 21.6% (95% CI: 9.8%-38.2%) and 10.8% (95% CI: 3.0%-25.4%), respectively.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival (months) in glioblastoma patients. According to promoter methylation status of (A) MGMT gene (log-rank test, χ2=7.997, df = 1, P = 0.005), (B) GATA6 gene (log-rank test, χ2 = 1.582, df = 1, P = 0.208), (C) CD81 gene (log-rank test, χ2 = 0.719, df = 1, P = 0.395), (D) DR4 gene (log-rank test, χ2 = 1.800, df = 1, P = 0.180), and (E) CASP8 gene (log-rank test, χ2 = 4.214 df = 1, P = 0.040).

Table 3

Kaplan-Meier survival function analysis in glioblastoma patients (log-rank test)

Variable		n	Events	Survival (months)
				Median	95% CI	P
MGMT promoter methylation	U	37	37	6.2	4.6 to 7.9	0.005
	M	39	32	9.9	4.2 to 15.7
GATA6 promoter methylation	U	24	20	9.6	7.2 to 11.9	0.208
	M	52	49	6.2	2.9 to 9.5
CD81 promoter methylation	U	41	38	7.5	4.6 to 10.3	0.395
	M	35	31	8.9	4.6 to 13.3
DR4 promoter methylation	U	44	40	8.9	4.9 to 12.8	0.174
	M	31	29	7.5	5.6 to 9.3
CASP8 promoter methylation	U	33	29	9.9	6.9 to 12.9	0.040
	M	42	39	6.2	3.3 to 9.2

n – total number of patients; M – methylated; U – unmethylated.

No significant associations between the methylation of GATA6, CD81, and DR4 and patient survival were identified (Figures 2B–D). However, analysis of patient survival at early postoperative period showed a significantly shorter survival among patients with the methylated GATA6 promoter (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.045).

Contrary to the methylation profile of MGMT, the methylation of the CASP8 promoter was associated with shorter survival (log-rank test, P = 0.040) (Figure 2E). The median survival among patients with the unmethylated CASP8 promoter was 9.9 months (95% CI: 6.9-12.9 month) as compared with 6.2 months (95% CI: 3.3-9.2 months) among their counterparts with the methylated CASP8 promoter.

Associations between gene co-methylation and patient survival

Concomitant gene methylation effect on patient survival was done on genes significantly associated with survival in the univariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that not methylated MGMT in a case of methylated GATA6 and CASP8 were significantly associated with worse outcome (median survival – 3.8 months and 4.9 months, respectively) as compared to that of the patients whose tumors had methylated MGMT with unmethylated GATA6 and CASP8 (median survival – 10.9 and 14.1 months respectively, log-rank test, P = 0.009 and P = 0.003 respectively), as well as tumors with no methylation of both genes (MGMT and GATA6) (median survival – 9.6 months, log-rank test, P = 0.043), and tumors with double methylation (MGMT and CASP8, MGMT and GATA6, median survival – 8.9 and 8.9 months, log-rank test, P = 0.019 and P = 0.006 respectively) (Figure 3A-B). Concomitant methylation status analysis of GATA6 and CASP8 showed the lowest median survival in a group of patients with both methylated genes in a tumor (median survival – 4.9 months), and the difference was significant as compared with patients whose tumors had methylated GATA6 and unmethylated CASP8 (median survival – 9.7 months; log-rank test, P = 0.03) (Figure 3C).

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival (months) in glioblastoma patients plotted according to concomitant gene methylation patterns. (A) MGMT and GATA6 gene methylation status (log-rank test, χ2 = 13.058, df = 3, P = 0.005), (B) MGMT and CASP8 gene methylation status (log-rank test, χ2 = 12.314, df = 3, P = 0.006), (C) GATA6 and CASP8 gene methylation status (log-rank test, χ2 = 7.712, df = 3, P = 0.052).

Univariate Cox analysis identified patient age, treatment modality, and methylation profile of the MGMT and CASP8 promoters as independent predictive factors significantly associated with patient survival. Patients older than 60 years were more likely to survive shorter than their younger counterparts (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.09; P = 0.001). Moreover, patients who underwent treatment with RT + TMZ had a 76% reduced risk of death (HR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.09-0.60; P = 0.003) as compared with patients treated with RT alone.

The methylation status of MGMT, CASP8, and GATA6 was of prognostic value for survival in a multivariate Cox model, when patient age and treatment were excluded (Table 4). The methylated MGMT promoter was associated with longer survival (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.27-0.76; P = 0.002). Contrary, the methylated GATA6 and CASP8 promoters were found to be associated with shorter survival (HR: 1.77 95% CI: 1.02-3.05; P = 0.041 and HR: 1.84 95% CI: 1.05-3.22; P = 0.033, respectively).

Table 4

Multivariate Cox regression survival analysis for glioblastoma patients

Variable	Multivariate Cox regression
	HR	95% CI	P
MGMT	0.45	0.27-0.76	0.002
GATA6	1.77	1.02-3.05	0.041
CD81	0.69	0.41-1.15	0.168
CASP8	1.84	1.05-3.22	0.033
DR4	1.09	0.65-1.83	0.755

HR – hazard ratio, CI – confidence interval.

When the patient sample was divided into two groups by age (<60 years and ≥60 years), multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that MGMT (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.42; P = 0.001) and GATA6 (HR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.01-7.65; P = 0.047) were independent predictors for patient survival in younger patients’ group, while there were no significant associations observed in older patients’ group when adjusted for therapy (data not shown).

Discussion

Our study demonstrated that epigenetic alterations affecting multiple genes, which are important in several cell functions, such as DNA repair, cell migration and apoptosis, are a frequent event in glioblastoma. At least one of the five genes tested was methylated even in 97.3% of patients with glioblastoma, while only 2.7% of patients had no detectable methylation. Analysis identified 3 genes epigenetically deregulated in more than 50% of glioblastomas: MGMT, GATA6, and CASP8. To our knowledge, only MGMT has been previously widely described in glioblastomas, while the data on the epigenetic regulation of GATA6, CD81, DR4, and CASP8 in patient glioblastoma are scarce.

This study showed that the most frequently methylated gene was GATA6, a transcription factor, with a methylation frequency of 68.4%. GATA6 is one of 6 members of the mammalian GATA family of transcription factors that regulates cell proliferation and differentiation and inhibits apoptosis [11]. Recently, it has been suggested as a tumor suppressor gene in tumors of the CNS with gene expression loss of 90% and promoter methylation of 30%-48% in glioblastomas [3,12-14]. It has been reported that loss of GATA6 results in enhanced astrocyte proliferation and transformation [14]. A decrease in GATA6 expression was observed in colon and ovarian carcinomas as well [15,16].

The CD81 gene showed promoter methylation in 46.1% of tested glioblastomas in the current study. This gene is a member of the membrane-embedded tetraspanin superfamily, which was found to be silenced by methylation in multiple myeloma cell lines [7]. CD81 participates in several functions in a cell like adhesion and signal transduction [17]. Recent glioblastoma methylome studies have shown CD81 methylation rate of 54% [2,3].

Analysis of the methylation status of two proapoptotic genes, CASP8 and DR4, in our study revealed that these genes were methylated in 56% and 41% of glioblastomas, respectively. The inactivation of these genes by promoter methylation has been previously reported in osteosarcomas [18], melanomas [19], medulloblastomas [20], gastric carcinomas [9], and glioblastomas [3,13,21,22]. The frequency of DR4 methylation in glioblastomas varied from 25% to 70% in different studies [3,21,22]. In our series as compared with the above studies, a lower frequency of DR4 methylation was observed, and we hypothesize that the difference could be attributed to the heterogeneity of glioblastomas. In contrast to the findings of Elias et al. [21] and Hervouet et al. [13] who showed 10%-30% methylation of CASP8 in glioblastomas, in this panel more than half of tumors were methylated (56%). The tendency of association between methylation of CASP8 and DR4 in glioblastomas was noted: co-methylation was observed in 28.4% (21/74) of tumors. A study carried out by Elias et al. [21] reported a smaller percentage of CASP8 and DR4 co-methylation in glioblastoma specimens (10%). It is known that DR4 and CASP8 are factors affecting the nonmitochondrial apoptotic pathway, and the loss of DR4 expression (which was shown to be mediated by promoter methylation) attenuates apoptosis and is associated with the resistance of glioma cells to proapoptotic ligand therapy (known as TRAIL resistance) [21]. The importance of CASP8 in TRAIL resistance in gliomas has been reported as well [23], while the data of other studies have strongly suggested TRAIL sensitivity to be CASP8-independent and DR4-specific [21].

Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene, encoding a DNA repair enzyme, has been recently found to be of predictive value in glioblastoma. In agreement with numerous studies where the methylation of MGMT was detected in approximately 40%-48% of primary glioblastomas [1,2,24], our study showed a methylation frequency of 51%. However, contrary to the study by Cecener et al. [12], this study found no significant association between the methylation of MGMT and GATA6 (P > 0.05) despite rather high comethylation of these genes (37%).

Correlations with patient parameters showed MGMT and CASP8 gene methylation associations with patient age. Glioblastoma patients with methylated MGMT were significantly younger than those whose tumor lacked methylation (P < 0.05) and an opposite was observed for CASP8 (P < 0.01). Contrary, glioblastoma study of Cecener et al. [12] showed MGMT methylation association with older patient age (≥ 50 years), while in the study of Weller et al. [24]MGMT methylation status was not associated with clinical parameters (age, extent of resection, Karnofsky performance score or treatment).

Several associations between survival and patients’ characteristics were observed. Survival was strongly correlated with patients’ age and treatment modality. In agreement with previous studies [24,25], it was observed that glioblastoma patients younger than 60 years and treated with RT + TMZ survived longer as compared with older and only RT-treated patients. Weller et al. [24] revealed age as a major therapy-independent factor in patient survival.

Cox regression analysis confirmed the methylation status of MGMTGATA6, and CASP8, but not CD81 and DR4, to be an independent factor for patient survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analysis showed the methylation status of MGMT to be significantly related to patient outcome. In agreement with previous studies [1,3,26] reporting the associations between MGMT methylation status and patient survival, our study showed that patients with methylated MGMT were more likely to survive longer and were at lower risk of death than those with the unmethylated gene. After dividing the patient sample into the groups by age (<60 years vs. ≥60 years), methylated MGMT remained a significant independent predictor of survival among patients aged less than 60 years. Furthermore, we confirmed significant association between the methylation profile of MGMT and treatment modality: in the group of patients treated with RT + TMZ, patients with methylated MGMT survived significantly longer than those with unmethylated gene promoter (median survival, 41.4 vs. 15.1 months) (data not shown).

In line with findings of the study by Martinez et al. [22], associations between the methylation of CASP8 and survival in our study showed gene methylation being an important factor for worse outcome of patients. Patients with unmethylated CASP8 as a favorable genotype had prolonged survival as compared with patients having tumors with methylated CASP8. Although CASP8 may play an essential role in apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy [27,28], our study showed only a trend toward significant associations between the methylation status of CASP8 and survival of the patients treated with RT, and no associations in the group of the patients treated with RT + TMZ (data not shown).

Survival among patients with the methylated vs. unmethylated GATA6 gene differed significantly at early postoperative period (3-month survival, 100% vs. 75%). Cox regression analysis demonstrated CASP8 and GATA6 as independent predictors for patient survival. Furthermore, GATA6 became independent predictor for survival in younger patient group. Contrary to our results, recently it have been reported no relationship of GATA6[12] and CASP8[13] methylation status with survival in patients with glioblastoma. In agreement with the methylome study by Martinez et al. [3], where the significance of GATA6 methylation in patient survival has been shown for the first time, our results suggest that the methylation of GATA6 is a frequent event and highly important for survival of patients with glioblastoma.

Conclusions

The current study reveals new and important information on MGMT, GATA6 and CASP8 promoter methylation in glioblastoma. GATA6 methylation occurred at a highest rate. Patient age, treatment regimen, MGMT, GATA6 and CASP8 methylation status were significantly associated with patient survival. MGMT and GATA6 were independent predictors for patient survival in younger patients’ group when adjusted for therapy. To further evaluate validation of the methylation profile of these genes is necessary for understanding their role in gliomagenesis and potential as GBM markers.

Competing interests

The authors are not aware of any biases that might be perceived as affecting the objectivity of this article.

Authors’ contributions

DS, PV, and VA generated an idea. DS did a part of DR4, MGMT and GATA6 MSP analysis, statistical analysis and wrote a paper. PV did CD81 and CASP8 methylation analysis. VS did all statistical analysis. AT, KS, PVD generated an idea, gathered postoperative glioblastoma tissue and patient data.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/218/prepub