PURPOSE: The prognostic value of genetic alterations characteristic of glioblastoma in patients treated according to present standards of care is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred one patients with glioblastoma were prospectively recruited between October 2004 and December 2006 at the clinical centers of the German Glioma Network. Two hundred fifty-eight patients had radiotherapy, 199 patients had temozolomide, 189 had both, and seven had another chemotherapy as the initial treatment. The tumors were investigated for TP53 mutation, p53 immunoreactivity, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin-dependent kinase CDK 4 or murine double minute 2 amplification, CDKN2A homozygous deletion, allelic losses on chromosome arms 1p, 9p, 10q, and 19q, O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations. RESULTS: Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.8 and 12.5 months. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, higher performance score, MGMT promoter methylation, and temozolomide radiochemotherapy as independent factors associated with longer OS. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer PFS (relative risk [RR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68; P < .001) and OS (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.54; P < .001) in patients receiving temozolomide. IDH1 mutations were associated with prolonged PFS (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.91; P = .028) and a trend for prolonged OS (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.19; P = .10). No other molecular factor was associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: Molecular changes associated with gliomagenesis do not predict response to therapy in glioblastoma patients managed according to current standards of care. MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutational status allow for stratification into prognostically distinct subgroups.
PURPOSE: The prognostic value of genetic alterations characteristic of glioblastoma in patients treated according to present standards of care is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred one patients with glioblastoma were prospectively recruited between October 2004 and December 2006 at the clinical centers of the German Glioma Network. Two hundred fifty-eight patients had radiotherapy, 199 patients had temozolomide, 189 had both, and seven had another chemotherapy as the initial treatment. The tumors were investigated for TP53 mutation, p53 immunoreactivity, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin-dependent kinase CDK 4 or murine double minute 2 amplification, CDKN2A homozygous deletion, allelic losses on chromosome arms 1p, 9p, 10q, and 19q, O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations. RESULTS: Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.8 and 12.5 months. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, higher performance score, MGMT promoter methylation, and temozolomide radiochemotherapy as independent factors associated with longer OS. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer PFS (relative risk [RR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68; P < .001) and OS (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.54; P < .001) in patients receiving temozolomide. IDH1 mutations were associated with prolonged PFS (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.91; P = .028) and a trend for prolonged OS (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.19; P = .10). No other molecular factor was associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: Molecular changes associated with gliomagenesis do not predict response to therapy in glioblastomapatients managed according to current standards of care. MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutational status allow for stratification into prognostically distinct subgroups.
Authors: Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Markus Weiler; Tracy Batchelor; Alfred W K Yung; Michael Platten Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Benjamin Berger; David Capper; Dieter Lemke; Philipp-Niclas Pfenning; Michael Platten; Michael Weller; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Markus Weiler Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Betty Y S Kim; Wen Jiang; Jason Beiko; Sujit S Prabhu; Franco DeMonte; Mark R Gilbert; Raymond Sawaya; Kenneth D Aldape; Daniel P Cahill; Ian E McCutcheon Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Shadi Lalezari; Arthur P Chou; Anh Tran; Orestes E Solis; Negar Khanlou; Weidong Chen; Sichen Li; Jose A Carrillo; Reshmi Chowdhury; Julia Selfridge; Desiree E Sanchez; Ryan W Wilson; Mira Zurayk; Jonathan Lalezari; Jerry J Lou; Laurel Ormiston; Karen Ancheta; Robert Hanna; Paul Miller; David Piccioni; Benjamin M Ellingson; Colin Buchanan; Paul S Mischel; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Richard Green; He-Jing Wang; Whitney B Pope; Linda M Liau; Robert M Elashoff; Timothy F Cloughesy; William H Yong; Albert Lai Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Martin van den Bent; Joerg C Tonn; Marc Sanson; Wolfgang Wick; Guido Reifenberger Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Ramon F Barajas; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Daniel Schwartz; Heather L McConnell; David R Pettersson; Andrea Horvath; Laszlo Szidonya; Csanad G Varallyay; Jenny Firkins; Jerry J Jaboin; Charlotte D Kubicky; Ahmed M Raslan; Aclan Dogan; Justin S Cetas; Jeremy Ciporen; Seunggu J Han; Prakash Ambady; Leslie L Muldoon; Randy Woltjer; William D Rooney; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 12.300