Literature DB >> 22670689

Feature binding and attention in working memory: a resolution of previous contradictory findings.

Richard J Allen1, Graham J Hitch, Judit Mate, Alan D Baddeley.   

Abstract

We aimed to resolve an apparent contradiction between previous experiments from different laboratories, using dual-task methodology to compare effects of a concurrent executive load on immediate recognition memory for colours or shapes of items or their colour-shape combinations. Results of two experiments confirmed previous evidence that an irrelevant attentional load interferes equally with memory for features and memory for feature bindings. Detailed analyses suggested that previous contradictory evidence arose from limitations in the way recognition memory was measured. The present findings are inconsistent with an earlier suggestion that feature binding takes place within a multimodal episodic buffer Baddeley, ( 2000 ) and support a subsequent account in which binding takes place automatically prior to information entering the episodic buffer Baddeley, Allen, & Hitch, ( 2011 ). Methodologically, the results suggest that different measures of recognition memory performance (A', d', corrected recognition) give a converging picture of main effects, but are less consistent in detecting interactions. We suggest that this limitation on the reliability of measuring recognition should be taken into account in future research so as to avoid problems of replication that turn out to be more apparent than real.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22670689     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.687384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  20 in total

1.  A two-stage search of visual working memory: investigating speed in the change-detection paradigm.

Authors:  Amanda L Gilchrist; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations.

Authors:  Alexander L M Siegel; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

3.  What does visual suffix interference tell us about spatial location in working memory?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Judit Castellà; Taiji Ueno; Graham J Hitch; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

4.  Retrieval from long-term memory reduces working memory representations for visual features and their bindings.

Authors:  Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Melissa R Beck; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

5.  Feature binding and the processing of global-local shapes in bilingual and monolingual children.

Authors:  Milvia Cottini; Laura Pieroni; Pietro Spataro; Antonella Devescovi; Emiddia Longobardi; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

6.  Central and peripheral components of working memory storage.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults; Christopher L Blume
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-05-26

7.  Detection of the number of changes in a display in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Kyle Hardman; J Scott Saults; Christopher L Blume; Katherine M Clark; Mackenzie A Sunday
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Working memory units are all in your head: Factors that influence whether features or objects are the favored units.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Christopher L Blume; J Scott Saults
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Visual short-term memory always requires general attention.

Authors:  Candice C Morey; Malte Bieler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.