BACKGROUND: Interventions to treat mental disorders after natural disasters are important both for humanitarian reasons and also for successful post-disaster physical reconstruction that depends on the psychological functioning of the affected population. A major difficulty in developing such interventions, however, is that large between-disaster variation exists in the prevalence of post-disaster mental disorders, making it difficult to estimate need for services in designing interventions without carrying out a post-disaster mental health needs assessment survey. One of the daunting methodological challenges in implementing such surveys is that secondary stressors unique to the disaster often need to be discovered to understand the magnitude, type, and population segments most affected by post-disaster mental disorders. METHODS: This problem is examined in the current commentary by analyzing data from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. We analyze the extent to which people exposed to natural disasters throughout the world also experienced secondary stressors and the extent to which the mental disorders associated with disasters were more proximally due to these secondary stressors than to the disasters themselves. RESULTS. Lifetime exposure to natural disasters was found to be high across countries (4.4-7.5%). 10.7-11.4% of those exposed to natural disasters reported the occurrence of other related stressors (e.g. death of a loved one and destruction of property). A monotonic relationship was found between the number of additional stressors and the subsequent onset of mental disorders CONCLUSIONS. These results document the importance of secondary stressors in accounting for the effects of natural disasters on mental disorders. Implications for intervention planning are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Interventions to treat mental disorders after natural disasters are important both for humanitarian reasons and also for successful post-disaster physical reconstruction that depends on the psychological functioning of the affected population. A major difficulty in developing such interventions, however, is that large between-disaster variation exists in the prevalence of post-disaster mental disorders, making it difficult to estimate need for services in designing interventions without carrying out a post-disaster mental health needs assessment survey. One of the daunting methodological challenges in implementing such surveys is that secondary stressors unique to the disaster often need to be discovered to understand the magnitude, type, and population segments most affected by post-disaster mental disorders. METHODS: This problem is examined in the current commentary by analyzing data from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. We analyze the extent to which people exposed to natural disasters throughout the world also experienced secondary stressors and the extent to which the mental disorders associated with disasters were more proximally due to these secondary stressors than to the disasters themselves. RESULTS. Lifetime exposure to natural disasters was found to be high across countries (4.4-7.5%). 10.7-11.4% of those exposed to natural disasters reported the occurrence of other related stressors (e.g. death of a loved one and destruction of property). A monotonic relationship was found between the number of additional stressors and the subsequent onset of mental disorders CONCLUSIONS. These results document the importance of secondary stressors in accounting for the effects of natural disasters on mental disorders. Implications for intervention planning are discussed.
Authors: Philip S Wang; Michael J Gruber; Richard E Powers; Michael Schoenbaum; Anthony H Speier; Kenneth B Wells; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-12-17 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Josep Maria Haro; Saena Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Traolach S Brugha; Giovanni de Girolamo; Margaret E Guyer; Robert Jin; Jean Pierre Lepine; Fausto Mazzi; Blanca Reneses; Gemma Vilagut; Nancy A Sampson; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Jordi Alonso; Somnath Chatterji; Sing Lee; Johan Ormel; T Bedirhan Ustün; Philip S Wang Journal: Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc Date: 2009 Jan-Mar
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Terence M Keane; Robert J Ursano; Ali Mokdad; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Katie A Mclaughlin; John A Fairbank; Michael J Gruber; Russell T Jones; Matthew D Lakoma; Betty Pfefferbaum; Nancy A Sampson; Ronald C Kessler Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Antoine Messiah; Juan M Acuna; Grettel Castro; Pura Rodríguez de la Vega; Guillaume Vaiva; James Shultz; Yuval Neria; Mario De La Rosa Journal: Disaster Health Date: 2015-02-18
Authors: Robert H Pietrzak; Peter H Van Ness; Terri R Fried; Sandro Galea; Fran H Norris Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: John J McGrath; Sukanta Saha; Carmen C W Lim; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Jordi Alonso; Laura H Andrade; Evelyn J Bromet; Ronny Bruffaerts; José M Caldas de Almeida; Graça Cardoso; Giovanni de Girolamo; John Fayyad; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep M Haro; Norito Kawakami; Karestan C Koenen; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Sing Lee; Jean-Pierre Lepine; Katie A McLaughlin; Maria E Medina-Mora; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Akin Ojagbemi; Jose Posada-Villa; Nancy Sampson; Kate M Scott; Hisateru Tachimori; Margreet Ten Have; Kenneth S Kendler; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Ahmad A Allah; Nada E Algethami; Rahma A Algethami; Raghad H ALAyyubi; Wahaj A Altalhi; Aymen A Ahmed Atalla Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2021-11-05