CONTEXT: Complicated grief is a debilitating disorder associated with important negative health consequences, but the results of existing treatments for it have been disappointing. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a novel approach, complicated grief treatment, with a standard psychotherapy (interpersonal psychotherapy). DESIGN: Two-cell, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, stratified by manner of death of loved one and treatment site. SETTING:A university-based psychiatric research clinic as well as a satellite clinic in a low-income African American community between April 2001 and April 2004. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 83 women and 12 men aged 18 to 85 years recruited through professional referral, self-referral, and media announcements who met criteria for complicated grief. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive interpersonal psychotherapy (n = 46) or complicated grief treatment (n = 49); both were administered in 16 sessions during an average interval of 19 weeks per participant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Treatment response, defined either as independent evaluator-rated Clinical Global Improvement score of 1 or 2 or as time to a 20-point or better improvement in the self-reported Inventory of Complicated Grief. RESULTS: Both treatments produced improvement in complicated grief symptoms. The response rate was greater for complicated grief treatment (51%) than for interpersonal psychotherapy (28%; P = .02) and time to response was faster for complicated grief treatment (P = .02). The number needed to treat was 4.3. CONCLUSION:Complicated grief treatment is an improved treatment over interpersonal psychotherapy, showing higher response rates and faster time to response.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Complicated grief is a debilitating disorder associated with important negative health consequences, but the results of existing treatments for it have been disappointing. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a novel approach, complicated grief treatment, with a standard psychotherapy (interpersonal psychotherapy). DESIGN: Two-cell, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, stratified by manner of death of loved one and treatment site. SETTING: A university-based psychiatric research clinic as well as a satellite clinic in a low-income African American community between April 2001 and April 2004. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 83 women and 12 men aged 18 to 85 years recruited through professional referral, self-referral, and media announcements who met criteria for complicated grief. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomly assigned to receive interpersonal psychotherapy (n = 46) or complicated grief treatment (n = 49); both were administered in 16 sessions during an average interval of 19 weeks per participant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Treatment response, defined either as independent evaluator-rated Clinical Global Improvement score of 1 or 2 or as time to a 20-point or better improvement in the self-reported Inventory of Complicated Grief. RESULTS: Both treatments produced improvement in complicated grief symptoms. The response rate was greater for complicated grief treatment (51%) than for interpersonal psychotherapy (28%; P = .02) and time to response was faster for complicated grief treatment (P = .02). The number needed to treat was 4.3. CONCLUSION: Complicated grief treatment is an improved treatment over interpersonal psychotherapy, showing higher response rates and faster time to response.
Authors: H G Prigerson; A J Bierhals; S V Kasl; C F Reynolds; M K Shear; N Day; L C Beery; J T Newsom; S Jacobs Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: C F Reynolds; M D Miller; R E Pasternak; E Frank; J M Perel; C Cornes; P R Houck; S Mazumdar; M A Dew; D J Kupfer Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Irwin N Sandler; Yue Ma; Jenn-Yun Tein; Tim S Ayers; Sharlene Wolchik; Cara Kennedy; Roger Millsap Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2010-04
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Paul K Maciejewski; Ronald M Epstein; Joshua J Fenton; Benjamin Chapman; Sally A Norton; Michael Hoerger; Marsha N Wittink; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Supriya Mohile; Richard L Kravitz; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Anne Germain; Katherine M Shear; Colleen Walsh; Daniel J Buysse; Timothy H Monk; Charles F Reynolds; Ellen Frank; Russell Silowash Journal: Death Stud Date: 2013-03
Authors: Luana Marques; Eric Bui; Nicole LeBlanc; Eliora Porter; Donald Robinaugh; M Taylor Dryman; Mireya Nadal-Vicens; John Worthington; Naomi Simon Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 6.505