Literature DB >> 22669352

Validation of a measurement to predict upper airway collapsibility during sedation for colonoscopy.

Suzanne B Karan1, Elia D Rackovsky, William A Voter, Ashok N Shah, Denham S Ward.   

Abstract

Techniques to quantify the effects of sedation on upper airway collapsibility have been used as research tools in the laboratory and operating room. However, they have not been used previously in the usual clinical practice environment of colonoscopy sedation. The propensity for upper airway collapsibility, quantified as the critical pharyngeal pressure (P(crit)), was hypothesized to correlate with the need for clinical intervention to maintain ventilation. Twenty patients scheduled for colonoscopy with sedation were prospectively recruited to undergo measurement of upper airway collapsibility using negative airway pressure (NAP) provocation with a minimum pressure of -18 cmH(2)O. The P(crit) was the negative pressure that collapses the airway, either directly or by extrapolation from the pressure-flow relationship. An exponential transformation was applied to the P(crit) data for statistical analysis. A clinical intervention score (CIS) was used to quantify required interventions by the sedation nurse. The measurement of the P(crit) during sedation was significantly larger (less negative) than both the baseline ("awake") (P = 0.0029) and late recovery (P = 0.01) values. The CIS was not predicted by the transformed baseline or sedated P(crit) with or without including demographics associated with sleep apnea syndrome. Although the NAP technique showed the expected changes with sedation in this clinical situation, we did not find that it predicted the need for clinical intervention during endoscopy. Our study was not large enough to test for subpopulations in which the test might be predictive; further studies of these particular groups are needed to determine the clinical utility of the NAP measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669352     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-012-9374-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  33 in total

1.  Collapsibility of the upper airway at different concentrations of propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  Peter R Eastwood; Peter R Platt; Kelly Shepherd; Kathy Maddison; David R Hillman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Upper airway collapsibility: an emerging paradigm for measuring the safety of anesthetic and sedative agents.

Authors:  Ronald S Litman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  The pharyngeal critical pressure. The whys and hows of using nasal continuous positive airway pressure diagnostically.

Authors:  A R Gold; A R Schwartz
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Induction of upper airway occlusion in sleeping individuals with subatmospheric nasal pressure.

Authors:  A R Schwartz; P L Smith; R A Wise; A R Gold; S Permutt
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-02

5.  A programmable system for acquisition and reduction of respiratory physiological data.

Authors:  J S Jenkins; C P Valcke; D S Ward
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Upper airway pressure-flow relationships in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  P L Smith; R A Wise; A R Gold; A R Schwartz; S Permutt
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-02

7.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Association of sleep-disordered breathing with postoperative complications.

Authors:  Dennis Hwang; Nawaid Shakir; Baba Limann; Cristina Sison; Sumeet Kalra; Lawrence Shulman; Andre de Corla Souza; Harly Greenberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Collapsibility of the upper airway during anesthesia with isoflurane.

Authors:  Peter R Eastwood; Irene Szollosi; Peter R Platt; David R Hillman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  J B Arrowsmith; B B Gerstman; D E Fleischer; S B Benjamin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the innovative endoscopic oropharyngeal airway and the conventional mouthpiece in elderly outpatients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy under sedation: a prospective and randomized study.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Chun Zhu; Xu Chen; Lei Tao; Keqiang He; Hao Wu; Xiaoqing Chai; Sheng Wang; Min Xia
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.