Literature DB >> 1833259

Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

J B Arrowsmith1, B B Gerstman, D E Fleischer, S B Benjamin.   

Abstract

We used data from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's computer-based management system to compare the rates of serious cardiorespiratory complications and death associated with the use of midazolam and diazepam. Data were analyzed from 21,011 procedures. Midazolam was used in 15,061 of these procedures, diazepam in 4,302, and neither in 1,648. We assessed benzodiazepine dose, concomitant drug administration, type of procedure, and selected patient characteristics in each of these three groups. No significant difference between these three groups were noted other than the fact that certain clinical centers tended to exclusively use midazolam, whereas others used both benzodiazepines. Reports of serious cardiorespiratory complications and death were uncommon, occurring in 5.4 and 0.3 per thousand procedures, respectively. Midazolam did not seem to place patients in this sample at greater risk for cardiorespiratory complications than diazepam. Concomitant use of narcotics and urgent and emergent procedures, however, did increase the risk of serious cardiorespiratory events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1833259     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70773-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  61 in total

Review 1.  Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a safe and less costly alternative.

Authors:  Kia Saeian
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-06

2.  What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N J Shaheen; J M Inadomi; B F Overholt; P Sharma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Risks versus benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Validation of a measurement to predict upper airway collapsibility during sedation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Suzanne B Karan; Elia D Rackovsky; William A Voter; Ashok N Shah; Denham S Ward
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Sedation practices for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Nigeria.

Authors:  Sylvester Chuks Nwokediuko; Olive Obienu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

6.  Prospective description of coughing, hemodynamic changes, and oxygen desaturation during endoscopic sedation.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid El Chafic; George Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yavuz Demiraran; Esin Korkut; Ali Tamer; Ilknur Yorulmaz; Buket Kocaman; Gulbin Sezen; Yusuf Akcan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Safety and prevention of complications in endoscopic sedation.

Authors:  Chang Hwan Choi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Single use of fentanyl in colonoscopy is safe and effective and significantly shortens recovery time.

Authors:  G Lazaraki; J Kountouras; S Metallidis; S Dokas; T Bakaloudis; D Chatzopoulos; E Gavalas; C Zavos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Patient comfort and quality in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Kevin Dowler; Roland M Valori; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.