Literature DB >> 24801833

Improved measurement of intersession latency in mfVEPs.

L De Santiago1, A Fernández, R Blanco, C Pérez-Rico, J M Rodríguez-Ascariz, R Barea, J M Miguel-Jiménez, C Amo, E M Sánchez-Morla, L Boquete.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to present a method (Selfcorr) by which to measure intersession latency differences between multifocal VEP (mfVEP) signals.
METHODS: The authors compared the intersession latency difference obtained using a correlation method (Selfcorr) against that obtained using a Template method. While the Template method cross-correlates the subject's signals with a reference database, the Selfcorr method cross-correlates traces across subsequent recordings taken from the same subject.
RESULTS: The variation in latency between intersession signals was 0.8 ± 13.6 and 0.5 ± 5.0 ms for the Template and Selfcorr methods, respectively, with a coefficient of variability CV_TEMPLATE = 15.83 and CV_SELFCORR = 5.68 (n = 18, p = 0.0002, Wilcoxon). The number of analyzable sectors with the Template and Selfcorr methods was 36.7 ± 8.5 and 45.3 ± 8.7, respectively (p = 0.0001, paired t test, two tailed).
CONCLUSIONS: The Selfcorr method produces smaller intersession mfVEP delays and variability over time than the Template method.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24801833     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-014-9438-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  7 in total

1.  Gaussian wavelet transform and classifier to reliably estimate latency of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP).

Authors:  Johnson Thie; Prema Sriram; Alexander Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reproducibility of multifocal VEP latency using different stimulus presentations.

Authors:  Prema Sriram; Alexander Klistorner; Hemamalini Arvind; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Nitin Ohri; E Bo Yang; Christopher Rodarte; Xian Zhang; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Christopher Rodarte; E Bo Yang; Nitin Ohri; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for heterogeneity of lesions in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Stuart Graham; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Tan Nguyen; Michael Paine; Justin O'Day; John Grigg; Hemamalini Arvind; Frank A Billson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  A comparison of multifocal and conventional visual evoked potential techniques in patients with optic neuritis/multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Larissa K Grover; Donald C Hood; Quraish Ghadiali; Tomas M Grippo; Adam S Wenick; Vivienne C Greenstein; Myles M Behrens; Jeffrey G Odel
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the methods of data analysis in multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  L Malmqvist; L De Santiago; C Fraser; A Klistorner; S Hamann
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.