PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to present a method (Selfcorr) by which to measure intersession latency differences between multifocal VEP (mfVEP) signals. METHODS: The authors compared the intersession latency difference obtained using a correlation method (Selfcorr) against that obtained using a Template method. While the Template method cross-correlates the subject's signals with a reference database, the Selfcorr method cross-correlates traces across subsequent recordings taken from the same subject. RESULTS: The variation in latency between intersession signals was 0.8 ± 13.6 and 0.5 ± 5.0 ms for the Template and Selfcorr methods, respectively, with a coefficient of variability CV_TEMPLATE = 15.83 and CV_SELFCORR = 5.68 (n = 18, p = 0.0002, Wilcoxon). The number of analyzable sectors with the Template and Selfcorr methods was 36.7 ± 8.5 and 45.3 ± 8.7, respectively (p = 0.0001, paired t test, two tailed). CONCLUSIONS: The Selfcorr method produces smaller intersession mfVEP delays and variability over time than the Template method.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to present a method (Selfcorr) by which to measure intersession latency differences between multifocal VEP (mfVEP) signals. METHODS: The authors compared the intersession latency difference obtained using a correlation method (Selfcorr) against that obtained using a Template method. While the Template method cross-correlates the subject's signals with a reference database, the Selfcorr method cross-correlates traces across subsequent recordings taken from the same subject. RESULTS: The variation in latency between intersession signals was 0.8 ± 13.6 and 0.5 ± 5.0 ms for the Template and Selfcorr methods, respectively, with a coefficient of variability CV_TEMPLATE = 15.83 and CV_SELFCORR = 5.68 (n = 18, p = 0.0002, Wilcoxon). The number of analyzable sectors with the Template and Selfcorr methods was 36.7 ± 8.5 and 45.3 ± 8.7, respectively (p = 0.0001, paired t test, two tailed). CONCLUSIONS: The Selfcorr method produces smaller intersession mfVEP delays and variability over time than the Template method.
Authors: Donald C Hood; Nitin Ohri; E Bo Yang; Christopher Rodarte; Xian Zhang; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Christopher Rodarte; E Bo Yang; Nitin Ohri; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Alexander Klistorner; Stuart Graham; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Tan Nguyen; Michael Paine; Justin O'Day; John Grigg; Hemamalini Arvind; Frank A Billson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Larissa K Grover; Donald C Hood; Quraish Ghadiali; Tomas M Grippo; Adam S Wenick; Vivienne C Greenstein; Myles M Behrens; Jeffrey G Odel Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2008-01-18 Impact factor: 2.379