Literature DB >> 2266863

Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument inference.

M M Lucas1, M K Tanenhaus, G N Carlson.   

Abstract

The level of representation accessed when inferences are made during sentence comprehension was examined. The inferences investigated included antecedent assignment for both definite noun phrase anaphors and pronouns and also instrument inferences. In making these inferences, a listener must access the inferred element, whether an antecedent or an instrument, in either a linguistic form representation or a discourse model. The level of representation involved in these inferences was determined by exploiting differences in the lexical decision and naming tasks, which were argued to exhibit differential sensitivity to representational levels. In three experiments, the priming of antecedent and instrument targets in the lexical decision task was compared with priming of the same targets in the naming task. Differences in the patterns of activation across the two tasks indicated that all three types of inferences required accessing elements in a discourse model. Three control experiments ruled out simple context or congruity checking as an explanation for our results. The following conclusions were also supported by these studies: (1) Antecedent assignment occurs immediately after processing an anaphor; (2) antecedent assignment involves inhibition for the inappropriate antecedent rather than facilitation for the appropriate antecedent; (3) although subjects do not make instrument inferences when they hear isolated sentences containing verbs that strongly imply certain instruments, the inferences are made when sentences are preceded by a context that mentions the instrument.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2266863     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

Review 1.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  J Nicol; D Swinney
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1989-01

2.  Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: the role of prospective prime-generated expectancies.

Authors:  D E Keefe; J H Neely
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

3.  Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing.

Authors:  R F West; K E Stanovich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-03

4.  Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context.

Authors:  R E Till; E F Mross; W Kintsch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

5.  Memory for syntax.

Authors:  P N Johnson-Laird; R Stevenson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Pronoun disambiguation: accessing potential antecedents.

Authors:  A T Corbett; F R Chang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-05

7.  A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.

Authors:  J I Chumbley; D A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-11

8.  Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: clause effects and pronominal reference.

Authors:  F R Chang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-01

9.  Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mechanisms that improve referential access.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  The effect of foregrounding on readers' use of predictive inferences.

Authors:  P Whitney; B G Ritchie; R S Crane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-07

2.  Retrieving text inferences: controlled and automatic influences.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

3.  Zero anaphora: transfer of reference tracking strategies from Chinese to English.

Authors:  Liang Tao; Alice F Healy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-03

4.  The Effects of Student and Text Characteristics on the Oral Reading Fluency of Middle-Grade Students.

Authors:  Amy E Barth; Tammy D Tolar; Jack M Fletcher; David Francis
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2014-02

5.  Knowledge Activation Versus Sentence Mapping when Representing Fictional Characters' Emotional States.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Rachel R W Robertson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  1992

6.  How Automatically Do Readers Infer Fictional Characters' Emotional States?

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Brenda M Hallada; Rachel R W Robertson
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  1998-07

7.  Comprehending Conceptual Anaphors in Spanish.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  1992

8.  "A cruel king" is not the same as "a king who is cruel": Modifier position affects how words are encoded and retrieved from memory.

Authors:  Hossein Karimi; Michele Diaz; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Do Readers Mentally Represent Characters' Emotional States?

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; H Hill Goldsmith; Rachel R W Robertson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  1992

10.  Age-related differences in the retrieval of phonologically similar words during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Hossein Karimi; Michele Diaz
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.781

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.