Literature DB >> 2752708

Mechanisms that improve referential access.

M A Gernsbacher.   

Abstract

Two mechanisms, suppression and enhancement, are proposed to improve referential access. Enhancement improves the accessibility of previously mentioned concepts by increasing or boosting their activation; suppression improves concepts' accessibility by decreasing or dampening the activation of other concepts. Presumably, these mechanisms are triggered by the informational content of anaphors. Six experiments investigated this proposal by manipulating whether an anaphoric reference was made with a very explicit, repeated name anaphor or a less explicit pronoun. Subjects read sentences that introduced two participants in their first clauses, for example, "Ann predicted that Pam would lose the track race," and the sentences referred to one of the two participants in their second clauses, "but Pam/she came in first very easily." While subjects read each sentence, the activation level of the two participants was measured by a probe verification task. The first two experiments demonstrated that explicit, repeated name anaphors immediately trigger the enhancement of their own antecedents and immediately trigger the suppression of other (nonantecedent) participants. The third experiment demonstrated that less explicit, pronoun anaphors also trigger the suppression of other nonantecedents, but they do so less quickly--even when, as in the fourth experiment, the semantic information to identify their antecedents occurs prior to the pronouns (e.g., "Ann predicted that Pam would lose the track race. But after winning the race, she..."). The fifth experiment demonstrated that more explicit pronouns--pronouns that match the gender of only one participant-trigger suppression more powerfully. A final experiment demonstrated that it is not only rementioned participants who improve their referential access by triggering the suppression of other participants; newly introduced participants do so too (e.g., "Ann predicted that Pam would lose the track race, but Kim..."). Thus, both suppression and enhancement improve referential access, and the contribution of these two mechanisms is a function of explicitness. The role of these two mechanisms in mediating other referential access phenomena is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2752708      PMCID: PMC4467536          DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90001-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  13 in total

1.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.

Authors:  C A Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Memory in reading and listening to discourse.

Authors:  J S Sachs
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-01

3.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher; K R Varner; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Components of activation: repetition and priming effects in lexical decision and recognition.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; W Hockley; G McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-12

5.  Anaphoric inference during reading.

Authors:  E J O'Brien; S A Duffy; J L Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Word recognition: context effects without priming.

Authors:  D Norris
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-03

7.  Pronoun disambiguation: accessing potential antecedents.

Authors:  A T Corbett; F R Chang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-05

8.  Establishing and accessing referents in discourse.

Authors:  G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-09

9.  Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: clause effects and pronominal reference.

Authors:  F R Chang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-01

10.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; David J Hargreaves
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  62 in total

1.  The processing of coreference for reduced expressions in discourse integration.

Authors:  C L Yang; P C Gordon; R Hendrick; J T Wu; T L Chou
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-01

2.  Effects of antecedent order and semantic context on Chinese pronoun resolution.

Authors:  H C Chen; H Cheung; S L Tang; Y T Wong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

3.  Words in a sentence become less accessible when an anaphor is resolved.

Authors:  J Nordlie; S Dopkins; M Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

4.  Understanding anaphors in story dialogue.

Authors:  D L Long; L De Ley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

5.  An eye-movement-contingent probe paradigm.

Authors:  Gretchen Kambe; Susan A Duffy; Charles Clifton; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

6.  Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences.

Authors:  Nicole Y Y Wicha; Elizabeth A Bates; Eva M Moreno; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  The accessibility of characters in single sentences: proper names, common nouns, and first mention.

Authors:  Janet L McDonald; Deborah M Shaibe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

8.  Conceptual locations and pronominal reference in American Sign Language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Brenda Falgier
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2004-07

9.  Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument inference.

Authors:  M M Lucas; M K Tanenhaus; G N Carlson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-11

10.  Disordered discourse in schizophrenia described by the Structure Building Framework.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Kathleen A Tallent; Caroline M Bolliger
Journal:  Discourse Stud       Date:  1999-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.