Literature DB >> 22665780

Hydrophobic forces and the length limit of foldable protein domains.

Milo M Lin1, Ahmed H Zewail.   

Abstract

To find the native conformation (fold), proteins sample a subspace that is typically hundreds of orders of magnitude smaller than their full conformational space. Whether such fast folding is intrinsic or the result of natural selection, and what is the longest foldable protein, are open questions. Here, we derive the average conformational degeneracy of a lattice polypeptide chain in water and quantitatively show that the constraints associated with hydrophobic forces are themselves sufficient to reduce the effective conformational space to a size compatible with the folding of proteins up to approximately 200 amino acids long within a biologically reasonable amount of time. This size range is in general agreement with the experimental protein domain length distribution obtained from approximately 1,200 proteins. Molecular dynamics simulations of the Trp-cage protein confirm this picture on the free energy landscape. Our analytical and computational results are consistent with a model in which the length and time scales of protein folding, as well as the modular nature of large proteins, are dictated primarily by inherent physical forces, whereas natural selection determines the native state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22665780      PMCID: PMC3382496          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1207382109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

Review 1.  Molecular chaperones.

Authors:  R J Ellis; S M van der Vies
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Implications of thermodynamics of protein folding for evolution of primary sequences.

Authors:  E I Shakhnovich; A M Gutin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The folding mechanism of larger model proteins: role of native structure.

Authors:  A R Dinner; A Sali; M Karplus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins.

Authors:  K W Plaxco; K T Simons; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04-10       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Three-dimensional domain duplication, swapping and stealing.

Authors:  J Heringa; W R Taylor
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  Protein denaturation.

Authors:  C Tanford
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1968

8.  Natural selection and the concept of a protein space.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The evolution of proteins from random amino acid sequences. I. Evidence from the lengthwise distribution of amino acids in modern protein sequences.

Authors:  S H White; R E Jacobs
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 10.  The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure.

Authors:  J S Richardson
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1981
View more
  8 in total

1.  Are proposed early genetic codes capable of encoding viable proteins?

Authors:  Annamária Franciska Angyán; Csaba Ortutay; Zoltán Gáspári
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  GroEL/ES chaperonin modulates the mechanism and accelerates the rate of TIM-barrel domain folding.

Authors:  Florian Georgescauld; Kristina Popova; Amit J Gupta; Andreas Bracher; John R Engen; Manajit Hayer-Hartl; F Ulrich Hartl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The cotranslational function of ribosome-associated Hsp70 in eukaryotic protein homeostasis.

Authors:  Felix Willmund; Marta del Alamo; Sebastian Pechmann; Taotao Chen; Véronique Albanèse; Eric B Dammer; Junmin Peng; Judith Frydman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  The ribosome as a hub for protein quality control.

Authors:  Sebastian Pechmann; Felix Willmund; Judith Frydman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Peptide-tiling screens of cancer drivers reveal oncogenic protein domains and associated peptide inhibitors.

Authors:  Kyle M Ford; Rebecca Panwala; Dai-Hua Chen; Andrew Portell; Nathan Palmer; Prashant Mali
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 11.091

6.  Interaction Potentials of Anisotropic Nanocrystals from the Trajectory Sampling of Particle Motion using in Situ Liquid Phase Transmission Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Qian Chen; Hoduk Cho; Karthish Manthiram; Mark Yoshida; Xingchen Ye; A Paul Alivisatos
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 14.553

7.  Long-Range Epistasis Mediated by Structural Change in a Model of Ligand Binding Proteins.

Authors:  Erik D Nelson; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is the hydrophobic core a universal structural element in proteins?

Authors:  Barbara Kalinowska; Mateusz Banach; Zdzisław Wiśniowski; Leszek Konieczny; Irena Roterman
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.