Literature DB >> 22665628

Benchmarking study of industry practices during commercial long haul transport of cattle in Alberta, Canada.

L A González1, K S Schwartzkopf-Genswein, M Bryan, R Silasi, F Brown.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to document current commercial practices during long haul transport (≥400 km) of cattle in Alberta through surveys delivered to truck drivers (6,152 journeys that transported 290,362 animals). The live beef export industry to the United States (89% of all journeys) had a large influence on long haul transport. This was particularly true for fat cattle going to slaughter (82%) and backgrounded feeders going to feed yards (15%). Most drivers had either limited (31% with < 2 yr) or extensive (35% > 10 yr) experience hauling cattle. The type of tractors and trailers used most frequently were those with more number of axles (quad-axle trailers pulled with push tractors) because they can accommodate extra weight. Mean (± SD) distance travelled was 1,081 ± 343 km (maximum of 2,560 km) whereas time animals spent on truck averaged 15.9 ± 6.3 h with a maximum of 45 h. However, only 5% of all journeys were greater than 30 h. The most frequent cause of delay was at the Canada-United States border crossing due to paperwork and veterinary inspections. Border delays occurred on 77% of all journeys which had a mean of 1.3 ± 1.9 h and up to 15-h long. Driver rest stops and waiting to unload cattle at destination were the second most frequent and longest cause of delay. Ambient temperature across all journeys ranged from -42 to 45°C with a mean value of 18 ± 11.8°C while temperature variation within a journey was from 0 to 46°C with mean value of 15 ± 6.6°C. The proportion of dead, non-ambulatory, and lame cattle for all journeys was 0.011, 0.022, and 0.011%, respectively. The cattle transport industry showed compliance with federal regulations and to a lesser extent with recommendations. Findings showed extreme values and very large variability in transport conditions however further research is needed to assess their impact on animal welfare outcomes. Delays within the journey as a result of border crossing, weather conditions, time on truck, shrink and space allowance may play an important role in improving cattle welfare during long haul transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22665628     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Welfare of cattle during transport.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Bernadette Earley; Sandra Edwards; Luigi Faucitano; Sonia Marti; Genaro C Miranda de La Lama; Leonardo Nanni Costa; Peter T Thomsen; Sean Ashe; Lina Mur; Yves Van der Stede; Mette Herskin
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

2.  Characteristics of Loads of Cattle Stopping for Feed, Water and Rest during Long-Distance Transport in Canada.

Authors:  Hannah E Flint; Karen S Schwartzkopf-Genswein; Ken G Bateman; Derek B Haley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  A Prototype Tool to Enable Farmers to Measure and Improve the Welfare Performance of the Farm Animal Enterprise: The Unified Field Index.

Authors:  Ian G Colditz; Drewe M Ferguson; Teresa Collins; Lindsay Matthews; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Influence of Season and Feedlot Location on Prevalence and Virulence Factors of Seven Serogroups of Escherichia coli in Feces of Western-Canadian Slaughter Cattle.

Authors:  Kim Stanford; Roger P Johnson; Trevor W Alexander; Tim A McAllister; Tim Reuter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Animal welfare in the U.S. slaughter industry-a focus on fed cattle.

Authors:  Lily N Edwards-Callaway; Michelle S Calvo-Lorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Long-duration transit and food and water deprivation alter behavioral activities and aggressive interactions at the feed bunk in beef feedlot steers.

Authors:  Katie J Heiderscheit; Alyssa D Freestone; Aubree M Beenken; Erin L Deters; Joshua M Peschel; Stephanie L Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.