Literature DB >> 22663171

Assessment of the relationship between adherence with antiemetic drug therapy and control of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Alexandre Chan1, Xiu Hui Low, Kevin Yi-Lwern Yap.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are little prevalence data in the literature on nonadherence to outpatient antiemetic regimens for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). It is unclear whether adherence with outpatient antiemetic regimens is associated with better CINV control. Our previous survey research supports the work of clinical pharmacists in collaborative practice with medical oncologists in improving adherence with antiemetic therapy in women undergoing highly emetic chemotherapy for breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES: To (a) evaluate the impact of adherence to delayed antiemetics (days 2-4 following anthracycline-based chemotherapy) on CINV control in breast cancer patients after anthracycline-based chemotherapy and (b) identify patient-related factors associated with nonadherence to delayed antiemetics.
METHODS: A single-center, prospective, observational study was conducted from December 2006 to January 2011 in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy (doxorubicin or epirubicin) and antiemetics at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS), the largest ambulatory cancer center in Singapore. Included patients were aged 21 years or older with confirmed diagnoses of breast cancer and receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy with antiemetics. Patients were excluded if they (a) were diagnosed with intestinal obstruction or received concurrent radiotherapy that predisposed them to nausea and vomiting, (b) had vomited in the 24 hours preceding chemotherapy, or (c) had brain metastases that would impair their judgment. Patients documented in a standardized diary their emesis events, severity of nausea, use of rescue therapy with metoclopramide, and compliance with dose instructions for antiemetic drug therapy for 5 days: day 1 was the day of chemotherapy and first day of antiemetic therapy, and day 5 was the day after completion of delayed antiemetic therapy (days 2-4). Three definitions were used to describe the CINV outcomes: (a) complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue therapy); (b) complete protection (no emetic episodes, no rescue therapy, and no significant nausea [Likert score 2 or less]); and (c) complete control (no emetic episodes, no rescue therapy, and no nausea). The delayed (days 2-5 post-chemotherapy) phase of these endpoints was analyzed. Nonadherence was defined as missing at least 1 dose of the delayed antiemetics from the prescribed regimen. Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between adherence and CINV outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 519 eligible patients, 88 (17.0%) patients declined participation; 35 (6.7%) were lost to follow-up; and another 35 (6.7%) were excluded due to the absence of therapy with delayed antiemetics according to guideline protocol. Of the 361 (69.6%) patients included in the final analysis, the mean (SD) age was 50.0 (8.9); the majority was Chinese (80.1%) and diagnosed with stage 2 or higher breast cancer (88.1%). A total of 152 patients (42.1%) self-reported nonadherent use of delayed antiemetics. Among all the nonadherent patients (n=152), 16.4% (n=25) achieved complete control; 34.2% (n=52) achieved complete protection; and 58.6% (n=89) achieved complete response, compared with rates of 26.8% (n=56), 39.7% (n=83), and 62.7% (n=131), respectively, for adherent patients (n=209). The rate of adherence to dexamethasone, which was prescribed for all study patients, was low (62.6%). After adjusting for potential confounders (ethnicity, educational level, and disease stage), adherent patients were more likely to achieve complete control of CINV (adjusted odds ratio=1.74, 95% CI=1.01-3.01, P=0.048). Among the demographic and CINV risk-factor variables, higher education, alcohol consumption, and prior exposure to other (nonanthracycline-based) chemotherapy regimens were associated with nonadherence (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although 42% of breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy were nonadherent with the dose administration protocol for post-chemotherapy antiemetic therapy, there was no significant difference in control of CINV compared with adherent patients except for the category of complete CINV control, defined as no nausea, no emesis, and no use of the rescue medication metoclopramide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22663171     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.5.385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  17 in total

1.  Treatment of postmastectomy pain with ambulatory continuous paravertebral nerve blocks: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Sarah J Madison; Preetham J Suresh; Navparkash S Sandhu; Nicholas J Kormylo; Nisha Malhotra; Vanessa J Loland; Mark S Wallace; James A Proudfoot; Anya C Morgan; Cindy H Wen; Anne M Wallace
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  A Nationwide, Multicenter Registry Study of Antiemesis for Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Japan.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Iihara; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Toshinobu Hayashi; Hitoshi Kawazoe; Toshiaki Saeki; Keisuke Aiba; Kazuo Tamura
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-21

3.  Impact of a complementary/integrative medicine program on the need for supportive cancer care-related medications.

Authors:  Ilanit Shalom-Sharabi; Noah Samuels; Efraim Lev; Ofer Lavie; Lital Keinan-Boker; Elad Schiff; Eran Ben-Arye
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Influence of pharmaceutical care on the delayed emesis associated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fátima Caracuel; Úrsula Baños; María Dolores Herrera; Gabriel Ramírez; Nuria Muñoz
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-01-31

5.  Antiemetic therapy in Asia Pacific countries for patients receiving moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy--a descriptive analysis of practice patterns, antiemetic quality of care, and use of antiemetic guidelines.

Authors:  Shiying Yu; Thomas A Burke; Alexandre Chan; Hoon-Kyo Kim; Ruey Kuen Hsieh; Xichun Hu; Jin-Tung Liang; Ana Baños; Carmel Spiteri; Dorothy M K Keefe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.359

6.  Control of chemotherapy-induced nausea in patients receiving outpatient cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Iihara; Hironori Fujii; Chiaki Yoshimi; Maya Yamada; Akio Suzuki; Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Takao Takahashi; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Yoshinori Itoh
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Effect of increase in duration of aprepitant consumption from 3 to 6 days on the prevention of nausea and vomiting in women receiving combination of anthracycline/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy: A randomized, crossover, clinical trial.

Authors:  Negah Chaabi Ahvazi; Simin Hemati; Mohamad Mohamadianpanah
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2015-10-29

8.  Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of single-dose fosaprepitant regimen for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Luigi Celio; Francesca Ricchini; Filippo De Braud
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Impact and management of chemotherapy/radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and the perceptual gap between oncologists/oncology nurses and patients: a cross-sectional multinational survey.

Authors:  Cheryl Vidall; Paz Fernández-Ortega; Diego Cortinovis; Patrick Jahn; Bharat Amlani; Florian Scotté
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Assessment of adherence to the guidelines for the management of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy.

Authors:  Monique Sedlmaier França; Pedro Luiz Serrano Usón Junior; Yuri Philippe Pimentel Vieira Antunes; Bernard Lobato Prado; Carlos del Cistia Donnarumma; Taciana Sousa Mutão; Heloisa Veasey Rodrigues; Auro del Giglio
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.