BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine with this randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study if benefits are afforded by adding a multiple-day, ambulatory, continuous ropivacaine paravertebral nerve block to a single-injection ropivacaine paravertebral block after mastectomy. METHODS: Preoperatively, 60 subjects undergoing unilateral (n = 24) or bilateral (n = 36) mastectomy received either unilateral or bilateral paravertebral perineural catheter(s), respectively, inserted between the third and fourth thoracic transverse process(es). All subjects received an initial bolus of ropivacaine 0.5% (15 mL) via the catheter(s). Subjects were randomized to receive either perineural ropivacaine 0.4% or normal saline using portable infusion pump(s) [5 mL/h basal; 300 mL reservoir(s)]. Subjects remained hospitalized for at least 1 night and were subsequently discharged home where the catheter(s) were removed on postoperative day (POD) 3. Subjects were contacted by telephone on PODs 1, 4, 8, and 28. The primary end point was average pain (scale, 0-10) queried on POD 1. RESULTS:Average pain queried on POD 1 for subjects receiving perineural ropivacaine (n = 30) was a median (interquartile) of 2 (0-3), compared with 4 (1-5) for subjects receiving saline (n = 30; 95% confidence interval difference in medians, -4.0 to -0.3; P = 0.021]. During this same period, subjects receiving ropivacaine experienced a lower severity of breakthrough pain (5 [3-6] vs 7 [5-8]; P = 0.046) as well. As a result, subjects receiving perineural ropivacaine experienced less pain-induced physical and emotional dysfunction, as measured with the Brief Pain Inventory (lower score = less dysfunction): 14 (4-37) versus 57 (8-67) for subjects receiving perineural saline (P = 0.012). For the subscale that measures the degree of interference of pain on 7 domains, such as general activity and relationships, subjects receiving perineural saline reported a median score 10 times higher (more dysfunction) than those receiving ropivacaine (3 [0-24] vs 33 [0-44]; P = 0.035). In contrast, after infusion discontinuation, there were no statistically significant differences detected between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: After mastectomy, adding a multiple-day, ambulatory, continuous ropivacaine infusion to a single-injection ropivacaine paravertebral nerve block results in improved analgesia and less functional deficit during the infusion. However, no benefits were identified after infusion discontinuation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine with this randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study if benefits are afforded by adding a multiple-day, ambulatory, continuous ropivacaineparavertebral nerve block to a single-injection ropivacaineparavertebral block after mastectomy. METHODS: Preoperatively, 60 subjects undergoing unilateral (n = 24) or bilateral (n = 36) mastectomy received either unilateral or bilateral paravertebral perineural catheter(s), respectively, inserted between the third and fourth thoracic transverse process(es). All subjects received an initial bolus of ropivacaine 0.5% (15 mL) via the catheter(s). Subjects were randomized to receive either perineural ropivacaine 0.4% or normal saline using portable infusion pump(s) [5 mL/h basal; 300 mL reservoir(s)]. Subjects remained hospitalized for at least 1 night and were subsequently discharged home where the catheter(s) were removed on postoperative day (POD) 3. Subjects were contacted by telephone on PODs 1, 4, 8, and 28. The primary end point was average pain (scale, 0-10) queried on POD 1. RESULTS: Average pain queried on POD 1 for subjects receiving perineural ropivacaine (n = 30) was a median (interquartile) of 2 (0-3), compared with 4 (1-5) for subjects receiving saline (n = 30; 95% confidence interval difference in medians, -4.0 to -0.3; P = 0.021]. During this same period, subjects receiving ropivacaine experienced a lower severity of breakthrough pain (5 [3-6] vs 7 [5-8]; P = 0.046) as well. As a result, subjects receiving perineural ropivacaine experienced less pain-induced physical and emotional dysfunction, as measured with the Brief Pain Inventory (lower score = less dysfunction): 14 (4-37) versus 57 (8-67) for subjects receiving perineural saline (P = 0.012). For the subscale that measures the degree of interference of pain on 7 domains, such as general activity and relationships, subjects receiving perineural saline reported a median score 10 times higher (more dysfunction) than those receiving ropivacaine (3 [0-24] vs 33 [0-44]; P = 0.035). In contrast, after infusion discontinuation, there were no statistically significant differences detected between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: After mastectomy, adding a multiple-day, ambulatory, continuous ropivacaine infusion to a single-injection ropivacaineparavertebral nerve block results in improved analgesia and less functional deficit during the infusion. However, no benefits were identified after infusion discontinuation.
Authors: Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Laurie B Burke; Richard Gershon; Margaret Rothman; Jane Scott; Robert R Allen; Hampton J Atkinson; Julie Chandler; Charles Cleeland; Penny Cowan; Rozalina Dimitrova; Raymond Dionne; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; David Kellstein; Robert D Kerns; Donald C Manning; Susan Martin; Mitchell B Max; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Dwight E Moulin; Turo Nurmikko; Steve Quessy; Srinivasa Raja; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; James P Robinson; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Gerold Stucki; Jane Tollett; Thorsten von Stein; Mark S Wallace; Joachim Wernicke; Richard E White; Amanda C Williams; James Witter; Kathleen W Wyrwich Journal: Pain Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Christopher L Wu; Andrew J Rowlingson; Alan W Partin; Murray A Kalish; Genevieve E Courpas; Patrick C Walsh; Lee A Fleisher Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Donal J Buggy; Denis C Moriarty; Edward Mascha; Daniel I Sessler Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Daphna M Finn; Brian M Ilfeld; Jonathan T Unkart; Sarah J Madison; Preetham J Suresh; Nav Parkash S Sandhu; Nicholas J Kormylo; Nisha Malhotra; Vanessa J Loland; Mark S Wallace; Cindy H Wen; Anya C Morgan; Anne M Wallace Journal: J Anesth Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Rishi R Agarwal; Anne M Wallace; Sarah J Madison; Anya C Morgan; Edward J Mascha; Brian M Ilfeld Journal: J Clin Anesth Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 9.452
Authors: Rodney A Gabriel; John J Finneran; Matthew W Swisher; Engy T Said; Jacklynn F Sztain; Bahareh Khatibi; Anne M Wallace; Ava Hosseini; Andrea M Trescot; Brian M Ilfeld Journal: Korean J Anesthesiol Date: 2019-09-02
Authors: Pasquale Sansone; Luca Gregorio Giaccari; Mario Faenza; Pasquale Di Costanzo; Sara Izzo; Caterina Aurilio; Francesco Coppolino; Maria Beatrice Passavanti; Vincenzo Pota; Maria Caterina Pace Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 2.217