Literature DB >> 23813915

Physical methods for intracellular delivery: practical aspects from laboratory use to industrial-scale processing.

J Mark Meacham1, Kiranmai Durvasula, F Levent Degertekin, Andrei G Fedorov.   

Abstract

Effective intracellular delivery is a significant impediment to research and therapeutic applications at all processing scales. Physical delivery methods have long demonstrated the ability to deliver cargo molecules directly to the cytoplasm or nucleus, and the mechanisms underlying the most common approaches (microinjection, electroporation, and sonoporation) have been extensively investigated. In this review, we discuss established approaches, as well as emerging techniques (magnetofection, optoinjection, and combined modalities). In addition to operating principles and implementation strategies, we address applicability and limitations of various in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo platforms. Importantly, we perform critical assessments regarding (1) treatment efficacy with diverse cell types and delivered cargo molecules, (2) suitability to different processing scales (from single cell to large populations), (3) suitability for automation/integration with existing workflows, and (4) multiplexing potential and flexibility/adaptability to enable rapid changeover between treatments of varied cell types. Existing techniques typically fall short in one or more of these criteria; however, introduction of micro-/nanotechnology concepts, as well as synergistic coupling of complementary method(s), can improve performance and applicability of a particular approach, overcoming barriers to practical implementation. For this reason, we emphasize these strategies in examining recent advances in development of delivery systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intracellular delivery; lab-on-a-chip; micro-/nanotechnology; microfluidics; transfection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813915      PMCID: PMC4449156          DOI: 10.1177/2211068213494388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lab Autom        ISSN: 2211-0682


  122 in total

1.  Electroporation and electrophoretic DNA transfer into cells. The effect of DNA interaction with electropores.

Authors:  S I Sukharev; V A Klenchin; S M Serov; L V Chernomordik
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Acoustic control of suspended particles in micro fluidic chips.

Authors:  Andreas Nilsson; Filip Petersson; Henrik Jönsson; Thomas Laurell
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  In vitro gene transfer by electrosonoporation.

Authors:  J M Escoffre; K Kaddur; M P Rols; A Bouakaz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  The role of electrophoresis in gene electrotransfer.

Authors:  M Pavlin; K Flisar; M Kanduser
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  A single cell electroporation chip.

Authors:  Michelle Khine; Adrian Lau; Cristian Ionescu-Zanetti; Jeonggi Seo; Luke P Lee
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Mechanism of in vivo DNA transport into cells by electroporation: electrophoresis across the plasma membrane may not be involved.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Steve Heston; Lisa M Shollenberger; Bin Sun; Marlin Mickle; Michael Lovell; Leaf Huang
Journal:  J Gene Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.565

7.  Uptake, biodistribution, and time course of naked plasmid DNA trafficking after intratumoral in vivo jet injection.

Authors:  W Walther; T Minow; R Martin; I Fichtner; P M Schlag; U Stein
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.695

8.  Magselectofection: an integrated method of nanomagnetic separation and genetic modification of target cells.

Authors:  Yolanda Sanchez-Antequera; Olga Mykhaylyk; Niek P van Til; Arzu Cengizeroglu; J Henk de Jong; Marshall W Huston; Martina Anton; Ian C D Johnston; Zygmunt Pojda; Gerard Wagemaker; Christian Plank
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Flow-through comb electroporation device for delivery of macromolecules.

Authors:  Andrea Adamo; Alessandro Arione; Armon Sharei; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Delivery of genes and fluorescent dyes into cells of the intact lens by particle bombardment.

Authors:  Valery I Shestopalov; Heather Missey; Steven Bassnett
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.467

View more
  26 in total

1.  Drug delivery: Puncturing cells en masse.

Authors:  Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  Analysis of poration-induced changes in cells from laser-activated plasmonic substrates.

Authors:  Nabiha Saklayen; Stefan Kalies; Marinna Madrid; Valeria Nuzzo; Marinus Huber; Weilu Shen; Jasmine Sinanan-Singh; Dag Heinemann; Alexander Heisterkamp; Eric Mazur
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Investigation of Optimized Treatment Conditions for Acoustic-Transfection Technique for Intracellular Delivery of Macromolecules.

Authors:  Min Gon Kim; Sangpil Yoon; Chi Tat Chiu; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Massively-Parallelized, Deterministic Mechanoporation for Intracellular Delivery.

Authors:  Harish G Dixit; Renate Starr; Morgan L Dundon; Pranee I Pairs; Xin Yang; Yanyan Zhang; Daniel Nampe; Christopher B Ballas; Hideaki Tsutsui; Stephen J Forman; Christine E Brown; Masaru P Rao
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Energy Transfer Mechanisms during Molecular Delivery to Cells by Laser-Activated Carbon Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Aritra Sengupta; Michael D Gray; Sean C Kelly; Stefany Y Holguin; Naresh N Thadhani; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Microfluidic generation of transient cell volume exchange for convectively driven intracellular delivery of large macromolecules.

Authors:  Anna Liu; Muhymin Islam; Nicholas Stone; Vikram Varadarajan; Jenny Jeong; Sam Bowie; Peng Qiu; Edmund K Waller; Alexander Alexeev; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 31.041

Review 7.  Ex vivo cell-based CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Yamin Li; Zachary Glass; Mingqian Huang; Zheng-Yi Chen; Qiaobing Xu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Facilitating the presentation of antigen peptides on dendritic cells for cancer immunotherapy using a polymer-based synthetic receptor.

Authors:  Cuicui Li; Masafumi Takeo; Masayoshi Matsuda; Hiroko Nagai; Sun Xizheng; Wataru Hatanaka; Akihiro Kishimura; Hiroyuki Inoue; Kenzaburo Tani; Takeshi Mori; Yoshiki Katayama
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 9.  Microfluidic Based Physical Approaches towards Single-Cell Intracellular Delivery and Analysis.

Authors:  Kiran Kaladharan; Ashish Kumar; Pallavi Gupta; Kavitha Illath; Tuhin Subhra Santra; Fan-Gang Tseng
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Lipid- and Polymer-Based Nanoparticle Systems for the Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Bhaargavi Ashok; Nicholas A Peppas; Marissa E Wechsler
Journal:  J Drug Deliv Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 5.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.