Literature DB >> 22658621

The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience.

Hiroki Ito1, Takashi Kawahara, Hideyuki Terao, Takehiko Ogawa, Masahiro Yao, Yoshinobu Kubota, Junichi Matsuzaki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine which parameters should be measured to preoperatively determine the stone burden as predictors of stone-free (SF) status after a single flexible ureteroscopy (URS). Although several stone parameters reportedly influence the outcome of treatment for urinary stones, the most reliable indicators of stone burden remain unclear.
METHODS: Patients with renal stones treated by flexible URS with holmium laser lithotripsy between October 2009 and December 2011 at a single institute were retrospectively evaluated. The SF status was determined by kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) films at postoperative day 1. Correlations of possible predictors with the SF status were analyzed using a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: According to the univariate analysis, the following variables were significantly associated with failed treatment: number of stones (P = .001), cumulative stone diameter (CSD) (P < .001), stone surface area (SA) (P < .001), stone volume (P < .001), and presence of lower pole calculi (P = .008). According to the multivariate analysis, the stone volume (P < .001) and the CSD (P = .015) were found to be independent predictors of SF status. The SA (P = .598) had no significant independent influence on the SF status.
CONCLUSION: Among the several parameters regarding the renal stone burden, the stone volume determined by noncontrast computed tomography and the CSD of the KUB were significantly and independently inversely related to the success rate of URS. Among the 3 parameters of stone burden, the SA was found to have a lower clinical utility and priority as a predictor of a SF status after URS.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22658621     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  33 in total

1.  Predicting the mineral composition of ureteral stone using non-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Manabu Kakizoe; Yoshitake Kato; Hitoshi Ishiguro; Hiroji Uemura; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Initial experiences with laparoscopy and flexible ureteroscopy combination pyeloplasty in management of ectopic pelvic kidney with stone and ureter-pelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Zhuo Yin; Y B Wei; B L Liang; K Q Zhou; Y L Gao; B Yan; Z Wang; J R Yang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Single session vs two sessions of flexible ureterosopy (FURS) for dusting of renal pelvic stones 2-3 cm in diameter: Does stone size or hardness play a role in number of sessions to be applied?"

Authors:  Ahmed Mamdouh Abd El Hamed; Hazem Elmoghazy; Mohamed Aldahshoury; Ahmed Riad; Mohammed Mostafa; Fawzy Farag; Wael Gamal
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

4.  [Application of machine learning models in predicting early stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones].

Authors:  X H Zhu; M Y Yang; H Z Xia; W He; Z Y Zhang; Y Q Liu; C L Xiao; L L Ma; J Lu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

5.  Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  The Impact of Stone Multiplicity on Surgical Decisions for Patients with Large Stone Burden: Results from ReSKU.

Authors:  Samuel Zetumer; Scott Wiener; David B Bayne; Manuel Armas-Phan; Samuel L Washington; David T Tzou; Marshall Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones?

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; J Stuart Wolf; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Early ureteral catheter removal after ureteroscopic lithotripsy using ureteral access sheath.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Manabu Kakizoe; Yoshitake Kato; Hiroji Uemura; Yoshinobu Kubota; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Outcome of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone with overnight ureteral catheterization: a propensity score-matching analysis.

Authors:  Mitsuru Komeya; Kimitsugu Usui; Takuo Asai; Takehiko Ogawa; Masataka Taguri; Koshi Kataoka; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Increasing the size of ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves surgical efficiency without increasing complications.

Authors:  Chad R Tracy; George M Ghareeb; Charles J Paul; Nathan A Brooks
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.