| Literature DB >> 22658131 |
Veronique Troch1, Kris Audenaert, Boris Bekaert, Monica Höfte, Geert Haesaert.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Powdery mildew, caused by the obligate biotrophic fungus Blumeria graminis, is a major problem in cereal production as it can reduce quality and yield. B. graminis has evolved eight distinct formae speciales (f.sp.) which display strict host specialization. In the last decade, powdery mildew has emerged on triticale, the artificial intergeneric hybrid between wheat and rye. This emergence is probably triggered by a host range expansion of the wheat powdery mildew B. graminis f.sp. tritici. To gain more precise information about the evolutionary processes that led to this host range expansion, we pursued a combined pathological and genetic approach.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22658131 PMCID: PMC3457899 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-76
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
isolates included in the analysis
| Bgta_A(1-20) | A | Belgium | 39 | 2009–2010 | |
| BgTR_A(21-37) | triticale | | | | |
| BgS_A(38-39) | | | | | |
| Bgta_B(1-7) | B | France | 16 | 2009–2010 | |
| BgTR_B(8-16) | triticale | | | | |
| Bgta_C(1) | C | Poland | 10 | 2009–2010 | |
| BgTR_C(2-10) | triticale | | | | |
| Bgta_D(1-3) | D | Israel | 7 | 1980’s | |
| Bgtd_D(4-6) | | | | | |
| Bgtdic_D(7) |
Wheat, triticale and rye cultivars used to characterize the virulence profile of the isolates
| Cerco | None | – | |
| | Axminster | – | |
| | Galahad | – | |
| | Asosan | – | |
| | Chul | – | |
| | Sonora | – | |
| | Broom | – | |
| | Khapli | – | |
| | Weihenste | – | |
| | Hope | – | |
| | Ibis | – | |
| | Holger | – | |
| | Kavkaz | – | |
| | Maris Dove | – | |
| | Sicco | – | |
| Triticale | Lamberto | – | Danko, Poland |
| | Krakowiak | – | Danko, Poland |
| | Moderato | – | Danko, Poland |
| | Grenado | – | Danko, Poland |
| | Maximal | – | Agri-Obtentions, France |
| | Grandval | – | Agri-Obtentions, France |
| | Borodine | – | Serasem, France |
| | Ragtac | – | RAGT, France |
| | Joyce | – | Sem-Partners, France |
| | Tribeca | – | Fl. Desprez, France |
| | Talentro | – | SW Seed, Sweden |
| | Cultivo | – | SW Seed, Sweden |
| | Agostino | – | SW Seed, Sweden |
| | Partout | – | Nordsaat Saatzucht GmbH, Germany |
| | Amarillo | – | Nordsaat Saatzucht GmbH, Germany |
| Dankowsky Złote | – | Danko, Poland |
aStandard wheat differentials with known powdery mildew resistance genes were used.
bFifteen triticale cultivars and one rye cultivar from different European breeding companies were used.
General reaction responses ofisolates collected from different hosts on triticale, wheat and rye cultivars
| +++ | ++ | − | |
| + | +++ | − | |
| + | − | +++ | |
a + indicates infection, − indicates no infection; a higher amount of + corresponds to a higher aggressiveness. Aggressiveness is interpreted here both as a quantitative and qualitative component of pathogenicity. Quantitatively as a higher amount of colonies with well developed hyphae and abundant conidia. Qualitatively as more isolates which are able to infect a particular host or cultivar.
b Number in parenthesis indicates the number of isolates from each source host that were used in this experiment.
Figure 1Principal coordinate graph (PCA) based on the virulence difference matrix on the inoculated wheat lines. Isolates were collected from triticale and wheat and sampled in four different regions.
Pairwise PhiPT estimates of the virulence profiles on wheat and triticale cultivars among theisolates sampled in different regions
| Belgium | France | Poland | Israel | |
| Belgium | 0 | | | |
| France | 0.000ns | 0 | | |
| Poland | 0.063ns | 0.031ns | 0 | |
| Israel | 0.250** | 0.371** | 0.577** | 0 |
| Belgium | France | Poland | | |
| Belgium | 0 | | | |
| France | 0.000ns | 0 | | |
| Poland | 0.016ns | 0.000ns | 0 | |
Negative PhiPT estimates were converted to zero.
P-values were estimated after 999 permutations; nsP > 0.01; **P < 0.001.
Phylogenetic information of the nuclear regions used in this study for the individual and combined datasets
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| isolatesa | 73 | 73 | 73 | 69 | 69 |
| haplotypes | 2 | 2 | 8 | 17 | 29 |
| sites | 483 | 473 | 1425 | 1183 | 2608 |
| constant characters | 472 | 420 | 1329 | 980 | 2309 |
| variable characters (uninformative) | 11 | 53 | 92 | 166 | 258 |
| parsimony informative characters | 0 | 0 | 4 | 37 | 41 |
| % informative characters | 0 | 0 | 0.28 | 3.13 | 1.57 |
| Model AICb | K80 | GTR | GTR | GTR + G | GTR + G |
aIsolates were collected from triticale (35), wheat (35) and rye (2). We also included an isolate from barley (B.g. f.sp. hordei) in our analysis for comparison. These sequences were retrieved from GenBank with accession numbers AJ313137, AB273568, AJ313149 and HM538424.1, respectively for each locus.
bModel of nucleotide substitution [49,50].
cWe were unable to obtain EF1α sequences for the isolates BgTR_A29, Bgta_B5, BgTR_B9 and Bgtd_D4.
dOnly the loci tub2 and EF1α were included in the combined dataset.
Figure 2Phylogeny inferred by Bayesian analysis from the combinedandsequence loci. The 50% majority rule consensus tree is shown. Maximum likelihood analysis recovered the same topology. The numbers below branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of steps (character changes) along the branch. Labels on the phylogeny are isolates collected from different hosts at different locations: BgTR triticale, Bgta wheat, Bgtd durum wheat, Bgtdic wild emmer wheat, BgS rye, BgH Barley; A Belgium, B France, C Poland and D Israel. Yellow shaded areas represent isolates pathogenic on triticale.
Figure 3Multilocus haplotype network from the 50% majority rule consensus tree inferred by Bayesian analysis. The network was performed in the program Haploviewer. The B.g. f.sp. hordei haplotype inferred from GenBank was excluded out of this analysis because of its large mutational distance with the isolates from this study. The circle area of each haplotype, coded as a number, is proportional to its frequency. Dots represent inferred unsampled or extinct haplotypes. Haplotypes framed with a dotted line represent isolates pathogenic on triticale.
Population structure ofby geographic region, host origin and pathogenicity
| By geographic region | ||
| Region A (36) vs. region B (14) vs. region C (10) vs. region D (6) | 0.5468* | 0.0469** |
| By host origin | ||
| triticale (33) vs. wheat (33) | 0.8654** | 0.0397** |
| By year of collection within host origin wheat | ||
| Region D 1980’s (6) vs. Region A-B-C 2009–2010 | 0.7283ns | −0.0025ns |
| By geographic region within host origin triticale | ||
| region A (16) vs. region B (8) vs. region C (9) | 0.5899** | 0.1008** |
| region A (16) vs. region B (8) | 0.6597ns | 0.0019ns |
| region A (16) vs. region C (9) | 0.7667* | 0.1116* |
| region B (8) vs. region C (9) | 0.8677* | 0.1428* |
| By pathogenicity | ||
| Pathogenic (37) vs. non-pathogenic (29) on triticale | 0.9811** | 0.0565** |
Region A represents Belgium, region B France, region C Poland and region D Israel.
aSample sizes are in parentheses.
bSnn (the nearest neighbor statistic) measures how often the most similar sequence (or sequences) is from the same designated population. Snn has a high power with small population sizes.
cHST is a measure of population subdivision that estimates FST among populations.
P-values were estimated after 1000 permutations; nsP > 0.01; *P < 0.01; **P < 0.001.