Literature DB >> 20531521

Amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential.

H Strasburger, W Scheidler, I Rentschler.   

Abstract

The amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential (VEP) and grating perception were studied for an unbiased group of fifteen healthy female subjects. The variability of VEP data, as obtained by using a digital sweep technique, was high between subjects but relatively low within them. Earlier claims that psychophysical detection thresholds can be predicted from VEP amplitude values were confirmed, whereas no correlation could be established between amplitude values and the perception of suprathreshold contrast. By using a principle of minimum phase difference the importance of VEP phase as an indicator of data reliability and of perceptual encoding processes could also be established.

Year:  1988        PMID: 20531521     DOI: 10.1364/AO.27.001069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  16 in total

1.  Variability of the steady-state visually evoked potential: interindividual variance and intraindividual reproducibility of spatial frequency tuning.

Authors:  W Joost; M Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The effect of spatial frequency and contrast on the latency in the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  P Jakobsson; B Johansson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Some thoughts on the interpretation of steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Relating the steady-state visual evoked potential to single-stimulus responses derived from m-sequence stimulation.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Maresa Groten; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Acuity VEP: improved with machine learning.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Can VEP-based acuity estimates in one eye be improved by applying knowledge from the other eye?

Authors:  Jessica Knötzele; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The effects of age on steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  H Tomoda; G G Celesia; M G Brigell; S Toleikis
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 8.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Threshold determination in sweep VEP and the effects of criterion.

Authors:  Naveen Kr Yadav; Fahad Almoqbel; Liseann Head; Elizabeth L Irving; Susan J Leat
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Smart Helmet: Wearable Multichannel ECG and EEG.

Authors:  Wilhelm Von Rosenberg; Theerasak Chanwimalueang; Valentin Goverdovsky; David Looney; David Sharp; Danilo P Mandic
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.