Literature DB >> 2265529

Why do young infants fail to search for hidden objects?

R Baillargeon1, M Graber, J Devos, J Black.   

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that infants as young as 3.5 months of age understand that objects continue to exist when hidden (Baillargeon, 1987a; Baillargeon & DeVos, 1990). Why, then, do infants fail to search for hidden objects until 7 to 8 months of age? The present experiments tested whether 5.5-month-old infants could distinguish between correct and incorrect search actions performed by an experimenter. In Experiment 1, a toy was placed in front of (possible event) or under (impossible event) a clear cover. Next, a screen was slid in front of the objects, hiding them from view. A hand then reached behind the screen and reappeared holding the toy. The infants looked reliably longer at the impossible than at the possible event, suggesting that they understood that the hand's direct reaching action was sufficient to retrieve the toy when it stood in front of but not under the clear cover. The same results were obtained in a second condition in which a toy was placed in front of (possible event) or behind (impossible event) a barrier. In Experiment 2, a toy was placed under the right (possible event) or the left (impossible event) of two covers. After a screen hid the objects, a hand reached behind the screen's right edge and reappeared first with the right cover and then with the toy. The infants looked reliably longer at the impossible than at the possible event, suggesting that they realized that the hand's sequence of action was sufficient to retrieve the toy when it stood under the right but not the left cover. A control condition supported this interpretation. Together, the results of Experiments 1 and 2 indicate that by 5.5 months of age, infants not only represent hidden objects, but are able to identify the actions necessary to retrieve these objects. The implications of these findings for a problem solving explanation of young infants' failure to retrieve hidden objects are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2265529     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90059-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  15 in total

1.  Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects.

Authors:  Andréa Aguiar; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  INFANTS' RECOGNITION OF THE SOUND PATTERNS OF THEIR OWN NAMES.

Authors:  Denise R Mandel; Peter W Jusczyk; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  1995-09

3.  Décalage in infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: converging evidence from action tasks.

Authors:  Susan J Hespos; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-06-06

4.  Can infants be "taught" to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? The case of height in covering events.

Authors:  Su-hua Wang; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Shake, Rattle, and … One or Two Objects? Young Infants' Use of Auditory Information to Individuate Objects.

Authors:  Teresa Wilcox; Rebecca Woods; Lisa Tuggy; Roman Napoli
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2006-01-01

6.  Young infants' reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects.

Authors:  Yuyan Luo; Lisa Kaufman; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Young infants' actions reveal their developing knowledge of support variables: converging evidence for violation-of-expectation findings.

Authors:  Susan J Hespos; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-09-07

Review 8.  Working Memory Maturation: Can We Get at the Essence of Cognitive Growth?

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-03

9.  Preschoolers' oculomotor behaviour during their observation of an action task.

Authors:  James D Morgante; Jeffrey M Haddad; Rachel Keen
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008-01-01

Review 10.  A hierarchical competing systems model of the emergence and early development of executive function.

Authors:  Stuart Marcovitch; Philip David Zelazo
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.