OBJECTIVES: To determine, in patients with melanoma, the dependence of PET sensitivity on pulmonary metastasis size, and to determine patients who require further evaluation for definite staging. METHODS: Of 183 melanoma patients who underwent (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) for staging or follow-up between January 2008 and June 2011, 38 patients (18 women and 20 men; mean age 62.0 ± 14.7 years) with one or more pulmonary metastases visible on CT were included in the retrospective study. Each pulmonary metastasis was rated as positive or negative on PET, and lesion size (maximum transverse diameter) was assessed on CT. PET sensitivity was calculated according to the lesions' size, in 2-mm steps. RESULTS: A total of 181 pulmonary metastases were analysed. PET sensitivity was 7.9 % for lesions of 4-5 mm; 33.3 % for lesions of 6-7 mm; 56.8 % for lesions of 8-9 mm; 63.6 % for lesions of 10-11 mm; 100 % for lesions of 12-14 mm; and 100 % for lesions of at least 15 mm. The differences in sensitivity between the size groups were significant (P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: With current state-of-the-art PET/CT technology, additional tests are necessary for definitive staging of melanoma patients who have one or more PET-negative lung nodules less than 12 mm in diameter on expiratory CT. KEY POINTS : • PET cannot rule out malignancy in pulmonary nodules less than 12 mm on expiratory CT. • Melanoma patients with PET-negative pulmonary nodules less than 12 mm require additional tests. • Knowledge of these factors can help interpretation of PET and PET/CT findings.
OBJECTIVES: To determine, in patients with melanoma, the dependence of PET sensitivity on pulmonary metastasis size, and to determine patients who require further evaluation for definite staging. METHODS: Of 183 melanomapatients who underwent (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) for staging or follow-up between January 2008 and June 2011, 38 patients (18 women and 20 men; mean age 62.0 ± 14.7 years) with one or more pulmonary metastases visible on CT were included in the retrospective study. Each pulmonary metastasis was rated as positive or negative on PET, and lesion size (maximum transverse diameter) was assessed on CT. PET sensitivity was calculated according to the lesions' size, in 2-mm steps. RESULTS: A total of 181 pulmonary metastases were analysed. PET sensitivity was 7.9 % for lesions of 4-5 mm; 33.3 % for lesions of 6-7 mm; 56.8 % for lesions of 8-9 mm; 63.6 % for lesions of 10-11 mm; 100 % for lesions of 12-14 mm; and 100 % for lesions of at least 15 mm. The differences in sensitivity between the size groups were significant (P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: With current state-of-the-art PET/CT technology, additional tests are necessary for definitive staging of melanomapatients who have one or more PET-negative lung nodules less than 12 mm in diameter on expiratory CT. KEY POINTS : • PET cannot rule out malignancy in pulmonary nodules less than 12 mm on expiratory CT. • Melanomapatients with PET-negative pulmonary nodules less than 12 mm require additional tests. • Knowledge of these factors can help interpretation of PET and PET/CT findings.
Authors: Rebecca P Petersen; Steven I Hanish; John C Haney; Charles C Miller; William R Burfeind; Douglas S Tyler; Hilliard F Seigler; Walter Wolfe; Thomas A D'Amico; David H Harpole Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Matthew D Gilman; Alan J Fischman; Vikram Krishnasetty; Elkan F Halpern; Suzanne L Aquino Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: C M Balch; S J Soong; J E Gershenwald; J F Thompson; D S Reintgen; N Cascinelli; M Urist; K M McMasters; M I Ross; J M Kirkwood; M B Atkins; J A Thompson; D G Coit; D Byrd; R Desmond; Y Zhang; P Y Liu; G H Lyman; A Morabito Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ivayla Apostolova; Rafael Wiemker; Timo Paulus; Sven Kabus; Thomas Dreilich; Jörg van den Hoff; Michail Plotkin; Janos Mester; Winfried Brenner; Ralph Buchert; Susanne Klutmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Fernando E Boada; Thomas Koesters; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 2.266
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Seau Tak Cheung; Paul Nathan; Rubeta N Matin; Naomi Chuchu; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan E Bayliss; Abha Gulati; Lopa Patel; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Manil Subesinghe; Zoe Traill; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-07-01
Authors: Abhishek R Keraliya; Katherine M Krajewski; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Atul B Shinagare; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Nikhil H Ramaiya Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2015-09-03