PURPOSE: External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an increasingly popular technique for treatment of patients with early stage breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery. Here we present 5-year results of a prospective trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From October 2003 through November 2005, 98 evaluable patients with stage I breast cancer were enrolled in the first dose step (32 Gy delivered in 8 twice-daily fractions) of a prospective, multi-institutional, dose escalation clinical trial of 3-dimensional conformal external beam APBI (3D-APBI). Median age was 61 years; median tumor size was 0.8 cm; 89% of tumors were estrogen receptor positive; 10% had a triple-negative phenotype; and 1% had a HER-2-positive subtype. Median follow-up was 71 months (range, 2-88 months; interquartile range, 64-75 months). RESULTS: Five patients developed ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), for a 5-year actuarial IBTR rate of 5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-10%). Three of these cases occurred in patients with triple-negative disease and 2 in non-triple-negative patients, for 5-year actuarial IBTR rates of 33% (95% CI, 0%-57%) and 2% (95% CI, 0%-6%; P<.0001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, triple-negative phenotype was the only predictor of IBTR, with borderline statistical significance after adjusting for tumor grade (P=.0537). CONCLUSIONS: Overall outcomes were excellent, particularly for patients with estrogen receptor-positive disease. Patients in this study with triple-negative breast cancer had a significantly higher IBTR rate than patients with other receptor phenotypes when treated with 3D-APBI. Larger, prospective 3D-APBI clinical trials should continue to evaluate the effect of hormone receptor phenotype on IBTR rates.
PURPOSE: External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an increasingly popular technique for treatment of patients with early stage breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery. Here we present 5-year results of a prospective trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From October 2003 through November 2005, 98 evaluable patients with stage I breast cancer were enrolled in the first dose step (32 Gy delivered in 8 twice-daily fractions) of a prospective, multi-institutional, dose escalation clinical trial of 3-dimensional conformal external beam APBI (3D-APBI). Median age was 61 years; median tumor size was 0.8 cm; 89% of tumors were estrogen receptor positive; 10% had a triple-negative phenotype; and 1% had a HER-2-positive subtype. Median follow-up was 71 months (range, 2-88 months; interquartile range, 64-75 months). RESULTS: Five patients developed ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), for a 5-year actuarial IBTR rate of 5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-10%). Three of these cases occurred in patients with triple-negative disease and 2 in non-triple-negative patients, for 5-year actuarial IBTR rates of 33% (95% CI, 0%-57%) and 2% (95% CI, 0%-6%; P<.0001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, triple-negative phenotype was the only predictor of IBTR, with borderline statistical significance after adjusting for tumor grade (P=.0537). CONCLUSIONS: Overall outcomes were excellent, particularly for patients with estrogen receptor-positive disease. Patients in this study with triple-negative breast cancer had a significantly higher IBTR rate than patients with other receptor phenotypes when treated with 3D-APBI. Larger, prospective 3D-APBI clinical trials should continue to evaluate the effect of hormone receptor phenotype on IBTR rates.
Authors: Bruce G Haffty; Qifeng Yang; Michael Reiss; Thomas Kearney; Susan A Higgins; Joanne Weidhaas; Lyndsay Harris; Willam Hait; Deborah Toppmeyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kevin R Kozak; Barbara L Smith; Judith Adams; Ellen Kornmehl; Angela Katz; Michele Gadd; Michelle Specht; Kevin Hughes; Valeria Gioioso; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Kristina Braaten; Abram Recht; Simon N Powell; Thomas F DeLaney; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hania A Al-Hallaq; Loren K Mell; Julie A Bradley; Lucy F Chen; Arif N Ali; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Gillian M Newstead; Steven J Chmura Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Abram Recht; Marek Ancukiewicz; Mohamed A Alm El-Din; Xing-Qi Lu; Chrystalla Martin; Stuart M Berman; Ariel E Hirsch; Lisa A Kachnic; Angela Katz; Shannon MacDonald; Elena A Nedea; Mary Ann Stevenson; Simon N Powell; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kevin S Hughes; Lauren A Schnaper; Donald Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Beryl McCormick; Brenda Shank; Judith Wheeler; Lorraine A Champion; Thomas J Smith; Barbara L Smith; Charles Shapiro; Hyman B Muss; Eric Winer; Clifford Hudis; William Wood; David Sugarbaker; I Craig Henderson; Larry Norton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samuel McGrath; John Antonucci; Neal Goldstein; Michelle Wallace; Chris Mitchell; Inga Grills; Shruti Jolly; Larry Kestin; Frank Vicini Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Paul L Nguyen; Alphonse G Taghian; Matthew S Katz; Andrzej Niemierko; Rita F Abi Raad; Whitney L Boon; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Csaba Polgár; János Fodor; Tibor Major; György Németh; Katalin Lövey; Zsolt Orosz; Zoltán Sulyok; Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy; Miklós Kásler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-05-25 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Benjamin D Smith; Douglas W Arthur; Thomas A Buchholz; Bruce G Haffty; Carol A Hahn; Patricia H Hardenbergh; Thomas B Julian; Lawrence B Marks; Dorin A Todor; Frank A Vicini; Timothy J Whelan; Julia White; Jennifer Y Wo; Jay R Harris Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King Journal: Curr Probl Surg Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Susan G R McDuff; Amir I Mina; Cheryl L Brunelle; Laura Salama; Laura E G Warren; Mohamed Abouegylah; Meyha Swaroop; Melissa N Skolny; Maria Asdourian; Tessa Gillespie; Kayla Daniell; Hoda E Sayegh; George E Naoum; Hui Zheng; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Laura E G Warren; Cynthia L Miller; Nora Horick; Melissa N Skolny; Lauren S Jammallo; Betro T Sadek; Mina N Shenouda; Jean A O'Toole; Shannon M MacDonald; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Adam L Liss; Merav A Ben-David; Reshma Jagsi; James A Hayman; Kent A Griffith; Jean M Moran; Robin B Marsh; Lori J Pierce Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Rachel Rabinovitch; Jennifer Moughan; Frank Vicini; Helen Pass; John Wong; Susan Chafe; Ivy Petersen; Douglas W Arthur; Julia White Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-09-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Rachel Y Lei; Charles E Leonard; Kathryn T Howell; Phyllis L Henkenberns; Timothy K Johnson; Tracy L Hobart; Shannon P Fryman; Jane M Kercher; Jodi L Widner; Terese Kaske; Dennis L Carter Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Elena Sperk; Daniela Astor; Anke Keller; Grit Welzel; Axel Gerhardt; Benjamin Tuschy; Marc Sütterlin; Frederik Wenz Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-07-12 Impact factor: 3.481