| Literature DB >> 22648240 |
Christian Heiss1, Parameswari Govindarajan, Gudrun Schlewitz, Nasr Y A Hemdan, Nathalie Schliefke, Volker Alt, Ulrich Thormann, Katrin Susanne Lips, Sabine Wenisch, Alexander C Langheinrich, Daniel Zahner, Reinhard Schnettler.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As women are the population most affected by multifactorial osteoporosis, research is focused on unraveling the underlying mechanism of osteoporosis induction in rats by combining ovariectomy (OVX) either with calcium, phosphorus, vitamin C and vitamin D2/D3 deficiency, or by administration of glucocorticoid (dexamethasone). MATERIAL/Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22648240 PMCID: PMC3560729 DOI: 10.12659/msm.882895
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Body weight of different rat groups at different time points (M being months). Asterisks indicate the significance level.
Figure 2Variation in T score of rat groups at months 1(M1) and 3(M3) post-OVX with the significance (two way ANOVA, along with Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test) indicated as asterisks.
Figure 3Variation in BMD of various rat groups (two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test) and longitudinal variation across time points (Friedman’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparison test).
Figure 4Variation in BMC of various rat groups at different time points and skeletal sites (two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test along with Friedman’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparison test).
Figure 5Fat percent of various skeletal sites of between groups (two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test) and across time points (Friedman’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparison test).
Comparison of BMC, BMD and area in spine and pelvis.
| Animal groups/skeletal site | Spine | Pelvis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMD (g/cm2) | BMC (g) | AREA (cm2) | BMD (g/cm2) | BMC (g) | AREA (cm2) | |
| Sham 0 month | 0.1506 (0.01) | 1.8300 (0.17) | 12.1000 (0.5676) | 0.1650 (0.00) | 1.5500 (0.1269) | 9.3000 (0.48) |
| OVX-Diet 0 month | 0.1478 (0.01) | 1.8500 (0.11) | 12.5000 (0.6823) | 0.1619 (0.01) | 1.4600) (0.10) | 9.0333 (0.41) |
| t test P value | 0.3313 | 0.6856 | 0.0870 | 0.3164 | 0.0502 | 0.1016 |
| Sham 1 month | 0.1560 (0.01) | 2.1286 (0.10) | 13.7143 (0.76) | 0.1757 (0.01) | 1.6429 (0.1272) | 9.5714 (0.53) |
| OVX-Diet 1 month | 0.1274 (0.01) | 1.8520 (0.12) | 14.6000 (0.76) | 0.1407 (0.01) | 1.2720 (0.11) | 9.0400 (0.35) |
| t test P value | <0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0169 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0053 |
| Sham 3 months | 0.1682 (0.00) | 2.4333 (0.26) | 14.5000 (1.38) | 0.1860 (0.00) | 1.7833 (0.12) | 9.5000 (0.55) |
| OVX-Diet 3 months | 0.1252 (0.01) | 2.0240 (0.20) | 16.1600 (0.98) | 0.1366 (0.01) | 1.2600 (0.13) | 9.3600 (0.49) |
| t test P value | 0.0002 | 0.0020 | 0.0080 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.3350 |
Comparison between BMD, BMC and area in spine and pelvis of osteoporotic and control rats. Values indicate mean and standard deviation within brackets and t test p value determines the significance.
Comparison of BMC, BMD and area in femur and tibia.
| Animal groups/Skeletal site | Femur | Tibia | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMD (g/cm2) | BMC (g) | AREA (cm2) | BMD (g/cm2) | BMC (g) | AREA (cm2) | |
| Sham 0 month | 0.1899 (0.01) | 0.5500 (0.05) | 3.0000 (0.00) | 0.1591 (0.01) | 0.3600 (0.07) | 2.1500 (0.37) |
| OVX-Diet 0 month | 0.1856 (0.01) | 0.5200 (0.05) | 2.9667 (0.13) | 0.1557 (0.01) | 0.3433 (0.05) | 2.3833 (2.00) |
| t test P value | 0.0640 | 0.0210 | 0.4230 | 0.2473 | 0.3751 | 0.1460 |
| Sham 1 month | 0.2021 (0.01) | 0.5714 (0.05) | 3.0000 (0.00) | 0.1639 (0.01) | 0.4000 (0.04) | 2.4286 (0.53) |
| OVX-Diet 1 month | 0.1677 (0.01) | 0.4840 (0.05) | 3.0000 (0.00) | 0.1363 (0.01) | 0.3160 (0.04) | 2.1000 (0.30) |
| t test P value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0044 |
| Sham 3 months | 0.2128 (0.01) | 0.6083 (0.02) | 3.0000 (0.00) | 0.1705 (0.01) | 0.3917 (0.02) | 2.0000 (0.00) |
| OVX-Diet 3 months | 0.1646 (0.01) | 0.5100 (0.05) | 3.0000 (0.00) | 0.1313 (0.01)) | 0.3160 (0.04) | 2.2000 (0.39) |
| t test P value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0961 |
Comparison between BMD, BMC and area in femur and tibia of osteoporotic and control rats. Values indicate mean and standard deviation within brackets and t test p value determines the significance.
Figure 6(A) Relationships between BMC, BMD and area of pelvis. (B) Relationships between BMC, BMD and area of spine.