Literature DB >> 26193857

The Rapid Cognitive Screen (RCS): A Point-of-Care Screening for Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

T K Malmstrom1, V B Voss, D M Cruz-Oliver, L A Cummings-Vaughn, N Tumosa, G T Grossberg, J E Morley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is a need for a rapid screening test for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia to be used by primary care physicians. The Rapid Cognitive Screen (RCS) is a brief screening tool (< 3 min) for cognitive dysfunction. RCS includes 3-items from the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam: recall, clock drawing, and insight. Study objectives were to: 1) examine the RCS sensitivity and specificity for MCI and dementia, 2) evaluate the RCS predictive validity for nursing home placement and mortality, and 3) compare the RCS to the clock drawing test (CDT) plus recall.
METHODS: Patients were recruited from the St. Louis, MO Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) hospitals (study 1) or the Saint Louis University Geriatric Medicine and Psychiatry outpatient clinics (study 2). Study 1 participants (N=702; ages 65-92) completed cognitive evaluations and 76% (n=533/706) were followed up to 7.5 years for nursing home placement and mortality. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were computed to determine sensitivity and specificity for MCI (n=180) and dementia (n=82). Logistic regressions were computed for nursing home placement (n=31) and mortality (n=176). Study 2 participants (N=168; ages 60-90) completed the RCS and SLUMS exam. ROC curves were computed to determine sensitivity and specificity for MCI (n=61) and dementia (n=74).
RESULTS: RCS predicted dementia and MCI in study 1 with optimal cutoff scores of ≤ 5 for dementia (sensitivity=0.89, specificity=0.94) and ≤ 7 for MCI (sensitivity=0.87, specificity=0.70). The CDT plus recall predicted dementia and MCI in study 1 with optimal cutoff scores of ≤ 2 for dementia (sensitivity=0.87, specificity=0.85) and ≤ 3 for MCI (sensitivity=0.62, specificity=0.62). Higher RCS scores were protective against nursing home placement and mortality. The RCS predicted dementia and MCI in study 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-item RCS exhibits good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of MCI and dementia, and higher cognitive function on the RCS is protective against nursing home placement and mortality. The RCS may be a useful screening instrument for the detection of cognitive dysfunction in the primary care setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26193857     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-015-0564-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  23 in total

1.  The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Marilyn S Albert; Steven T DeKosky; Dennis Dickson; Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Nick C Fox; Anthony Gamst; David M Holtzman; William J Jagust; Ronald C Petersen; Peter J Snyder; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Creighton H Phelps
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 2.  Mild cognitive impairment: disparity of incidence and prevalence estimates.

Authors:  Alex Ward; H Michael Arrighi; Shannon Michels; Jesse M Cedarbaum
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Screening for cognitive impairment: comparing the performance of four instruments in primary care.

Authors:  Tracey Holsinger; Brenda L Plassman; Karen M Stechuchak; James R Burke; Cynthia J Coffman; John W Williams
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  Clinical practice. Mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Utility of the SLUMS as a cognitive screening tool among a nonveteran sample of older adults.

Authors:  Leilani Feliciano; Sheena M Horning; Kelli J Klebe; Sarah L Anderson; R Elisabeth Cornwell; Hasker P Davis
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.105

6.  2015 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.

Authors: 
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  Comparison of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in detection of cognitive impairment in Chinese elderly from the geriatric department.

Authors:  Li Cao; Shan Hai; Xiufang Lin; Defeng Shu; Si Wang; Jirong Yue; Guanjian Liu; Birong Dong
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Improving identification of cognitive impairment in primary care.

Authors:  Soo Borson; James M Scanlan; Jill Watanabe; Shin-Ping Tu; Mary Lessig
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.485

9.  The Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University mental status exam (SLUMS exam) and the Mini-mental status exam as predictors of mortality and institutionalization.

Authors:  D M Cruz-Oliver; T K Malmstrom; C M Allen; N Tumosa; J E Morley
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 10.  Screening for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jane A Lonie; Kevin M Tierney; Klaus P Ebmeier
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.485

View more
  34 in total

1.  Brain health: the importance of recognizing cognitive impairment: an IAGG consensus conference.

Authors:  John E Morley; John C Morris; Marla Berg-Weger; Soo Borson; Brian D Carpenter; Natalia Del Campo; Bruno Dubois; Keith Fargo; L Jaime Fitten; Joseph H Flaherty; Mary Ganguli; George T Grossberg; Theodore K Malmstrom; Ronald D Petersen; Carroll Rodriguez; Andrew J Saykin; Philip Scheltens; Eric G Tangalos; Joe Verghese; Gordon Wilcock; Bengt Winblad; Jean Woo; Bruno Vellas
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.669

2.  Rapid Geriatric Assessment, Physical Activity, and Sleep Quality in Adults Aged more than 65 Years: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  F Tuna; A Üstündağ; H Başak Can; H Tuna
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Assessment of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using the Rapid Cognitive Screen.

Authors:  E Charbek; K Huynh; E Kim; R P Nayak
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 4.  Anorexia of Aging - An Updated Short Review.

Authors:  A D Jadczak; R Visvanathan
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Editorial: Screening for the Anorexia of Aging.

Authors:  C Warne; I T Forrester; L Jones; J E Morley
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Editorial: Aging Friendly Health Systems.

Authors:  A M Sanford; M Berg-Weger; J Lundy; J E Morley
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  The Importance of Geriatric Syndromes.

Authors:  John E Morley
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

8.  The Rapid Geriatric Assessment: A Quick Screen for Geriatric Syndromes.

Authors:  Milta O Little
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

9.  Validity and Reliability of Rapid Cognitive Screening Test for Turkish Older Adults.

Authors:  S Koc Okudur; O Dokuzlar; C Usarel; P Soysal; A T Isik
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

10.  Prevalence of Cognitive Frailty Phenotypes and Associated Factors in a Community-Dwelling Elderly Population.

Authors:  Q Ruan; F Xiao; K Gong; W Zhang; M Zhang; J Ruan; X Zhang; Q Chen; Z Yu
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.