Literature DB >> 22644746

Genotype imputation for African Americans using data from HapMap phase II versus 1000 genomes projects.

Yun J Sung1, C Charles Gu, Hemant K Tiwari, Donna K Arnett, Ulrich Broeckel, Dabeeru C Rao.   

Abstract

Genotype imputation provides imputation of untyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are present on a reference panel such as those from the HapMap Project. It is popular for increasing statistical power and comparing results across studies using different platforms. Imputation for African American populations is challenging because their linkage disequilibrium blocks are shorter and also because no ideal reference panel is available due to admixture. In this paper, we evaluated three imputation strategies for African Americans. The intersection strategy used a combined panel consisting of SNPs polymorphic in both CEU and YRI. The union strategy used a panel consisting of SNPs polymorphic in either CEU or YRI. The merge strategy merged results from two separate imputations, one using CEU and the other using YRI. Because recent investigators are increasingly using the data from the 1000 Genomes (1KG) Project for genotype imputation, we evaluated both 1KG-based imputations and HapMap-based imputations. We used 23,707 SNPs from chromosomes 21 and 22 on Affymetrix SNP Array 6.0 genotyped for 1,075 HyperGEN African Americans. We found that 1KG-based imputations provided a substantially larger number of variants than HapMap-based imputations, about three times as many common variants and eight times as many rare and low-frequency variants. This higher yield is expected because the 1KG panel includes more SNPs. Accuracy rates using 1KG data were slightly lower than those using HapMap data before filtering, but slightly higher after filtering. The union strategy provided the highest imputation yield with next highest accuracy. The intersection strategy provided the lowest imputation yield but the highest accuracy. The merge strategy provided the lowest imputation accuracy. We observed that SNPs polymorphic only in CEU had much lower accuracy, reducing the accuracy of the union strategy. Our findings suggest that 1KG-based imputations can facilitate discovery of significant associations for SNPs across the whole MAF spectrum. Because the 1KG Project is still under way, we expect that later versions will provide better imputation performance.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644746      PMCID: PMC3703942          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  35 in total

1.  Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Barrett; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; Bryan Howie; Simon Myers; Gil McVean; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-06-17       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase.

Authors:  Paul Scheet; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering.

Authors:  Sharon R Browning; Brian L Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Estimating African American admixture proportions by use of population-specific alleles.

Authors:  E J Parra; A Marcini; J Akey; J Martinson; M A Batzer; R Cooper; T Forrester; D B Allison; R Deka; R E Ferrell; M D Shriver
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Admixture mapping for hypertension loci with genome-scan markers.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhu; Amy Luke; Richard S Cooper; Tom Quertermous; Craig Hanis; Tom Mosley; C Charles Gu; Hua Tang; Dabeeru C Rao; Neil Risch; Alan Weder
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  NHLBI family blood pressure program: methodology and recruitment in the HyperGEN network. Hypertension genetic epidemiology network.

Authors:  R R Williams; D C Rao; R C Ellison; D K Arnett; G Heiss; A Oberman; J H Eckfeldt; M F Leppert; M A Province; S C Mockrin; S C Hunt
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants.

Authors:  Laura J Scott; Karen L Mohlke; Lori L Bonnycastle; Cristen J Willer; Yun Li; William L Duren; Michael R Erdos; Heather M Stringham; Peter S Chines; Anne U Jackson; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson; Chia-Jen Ding; Amy J Swift; Narisu Narisu; Tianle Hu; Randall Pruim; Rui Xiao; Xiao-Yi Li; Karen N Conneely; Nancy L Riebow; Andrew G Sprau; Maurine Tong; Peggy P White; Kurt N Hetrick; Michael W Barnhart; Craig W Bark; Janet L Goldstein; Lee Watkins; Fang Xiang; Jouko Saramies; Thomas A Buchanan; Richard M Watanabe; Timo T Valle; Leena Kinnunen; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Elizabeth W Pugh; Kimberly F Doheny; Richard N Bergman; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Francis S Collins; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Imputation-based analysis of association studies: candidate regions and quantitative traits.

Authors:  Bertrand Servin; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genotype imputation performance of three reference panels using African ancestry individuals.

Authors:  Candelaria Vergara; Margaret M Parker; Liliana Franco; Michael H Cho; Ana V Valencia-Duarte; Terri H Beaty; Priya Duggal
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Imputation of rare variants in next-generation association studies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Asimit; Eleftheria Zeggini
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Validation of genotype imputation in Southeast Asian populations and the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism annotation on imputation outcome.

Authors:  Worachart Lert-Itthiporn; Bhoom Suktitipat; Harald Grove; Anavaj Sakuntabhai; Prida Malasit; Nattaya Tangthawornchaikul; Fumihiko Matsuda; Prapat Suriyaphol
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.103

4.  A joint use of pooling and imputation for genotyping SNPs.

Authors:  Camille Clouard; Kristiina Ausmees; Carl Nettelblad
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 Genomes in African American studies.

Authors:  Dana B Hancock; Joshua L Levy; Nathan C Gaddis; Laura J Bierut; Nancy L Saccone; Grier P Page; Eric O Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A genome-wide scan for breast cancer risk haplotypes among African American women.

Authors:  Chi Song; Gary K Chen; Robert C Millikan; Christine B Ambrosone; Esther M John; Leslie Bernstein; Wei Zheng; Jennifer J Hu; Regina G Ziegler; Sarah Nyante; Elisa V Bandera; Sue A Ingles; Michael F Press; Sandra L Deming; Jorge L Rodriguez-Gil; Stephen J Chanock; Peggy Wan; Xin Sheng; Loreall C Pooler; David J Van Den Berg; Loic Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Brian E Henderson; Chris A Haiman; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genome at juncture of early human migration: a systematic analysis of two whole genomes and thirteen exomes from Kuwaiti population subgroup of inferred Saudi Arabian tribe ancestry.

Authors:  Osama Alsmadi; Sumi E John; Gaurav Thareja; Prashantha Hebbar; Dinu Antony; Kazem Behbehani; Thangavel Alphonse Thanaraj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  When Does Choice of Accuracy Measure Alter Imputation Accuracy Assessments?

Authors:  Shelina Ramnarine; Juan Zhang; Li-Shiun Chen; Robert Culverhouse; Weimin Duan; Dana B Hancock; Sarah M Hartz; Eric O Johnson; Emily Olfson; Tae-Hwi Schwantes-An; Nancy L Saccone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.