PURPOSE: Computerized adaptive test (CAT) methods, based on item response theory (IRT), enable a patient-reported outcome instrument to be adapted to the individual patient while maintaining direct comparability of scores. The EORTC Quality of Life Group is developing a CAT version of the widely used EORTC QLQ-C30. We present the development and psychometric validation of the item pool for the first of the scales, physical functioning (PF). METHODS: Initial developments (including literature search and patient and expert evaluations) resulted in 56 candidate items. Responses to these items were collected from 1,176 patients with cancer from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. The items were evaluated with regard to psychometric properties. RESULTS: Evaluations showed that 31 of the items could be included in a unidimensional IRT model with acceptable fit and good content coverage, although the pool may lack items at the upper extreme (good PF). There were several findings of significant differential item functioning (DIF). However, the DIF findings appeared to have little impact on the PF estimation. CONCLUSIONS: We have established an item pool for CAT measurement of PF and believe that this CAT instrument will clearly improve the EORTC measurement of PF.
PURPOSE: Computerized adaptive test (CAT) methods, based on item response theory (IRT), enable a patient-reported outcome instrument to be adapted to the individual patient while maintaining direct comparability of scores. The EORTC Quality of Life Group is developing a CAT version of the widely used EORTC QLQ-C30. We present the development and psychometric validation of the item pool for the first of the scales, physical functioning (PF). METHODS: Initial developments (including literature search and patient and expert evaluations) resulted in 56 candidate items. Responses to these items were collected from 1,176 patients with cancer from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. The items were evaluated with regard to psychometric properties. RESULTS: Evaluations showed that 31 of the items could be included in a unidimensional IRT model with acceptable fit and good content coverage, although the pool may lack items at the upper extreme (good PF). There were several findings of significant differential item functioning (DIF). However, the DIF findings appeared to have little impact on the PF estimation. CONCLUSIONS: We have established an item pool for CAT measurement of PF and believe that this CAT instrument will clearly improve the EORTC measurement of PF.
Authors: Morten Aa Petersen; Mogens Groenvold; Jakob B Bjorner; Neil Aaronson; Thierry Conroy; Ann Cull; Peter Fayers; Marianne Hjermstad; Mirjam Sprangers; Marianne Sullivan Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Herbert Fliege; Janine Becker; Otto B Walter; Jakob B Bjorner; Burghard F Klapp; Matthias Rose Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Morten Aa Petersen; Mogens Groenvold; Neil K Aaronson; Wei-Chu Chie; Thierry Conroy; Anna Costantini; Peter Fayers; Jorunn Helbostad; Bernhard Holzner; Stein Kaasa; Susanne Singer; Galina Velikova; Teresa Young Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Dennis A Revicki; Wen-Hung Chen; Neesha Harnam; Karon F Cook; Dagmar Amtmann; Leigh F Callahan; Mark P Jensen; Francis J Keefe Journal: Pain Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Lise Holst Thamsborg; Morten Aa Petersen; Neil K Aaronson; Wei-Chu Chie; Anna Costantini; Bernhard Holzner; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Teresa Young; Mogens Groenvold Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Therese Juul; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Bernhard Holzner; Søren Laurberg; Peter Christensen; Mogens Grønvold Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Morten Aa Petersen; Johannes M Giesinger; Bernhard Holzner; Juan I Arraras; Thierry Conroy; Eva-Maria Gamper; Madeleine T King; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Teresa Young; Mogens Groenvold Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Johannes M Giesinger; Morten Aa Petersen; Mogens Groenvold; Neil K Aaronson; Juan I Arraras; Thierry Conroy; Eva M Gamper; Georg Kemmler; Madeleine T King; Anne S Oberguggenberger; Galina Velikova; Teresa Young; Bernhard Holzner Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Anna T Johnsen; Anette Damkier; Tove B Vejlgaard; Jane Lindschou; Per Sjøgren; Christian Gluud; Mette A Neergaard; Morten Aa Petersen; Lena E Lundorff; Lise Pedersen; Peter Fayers; Annette S Strömgren; Irene J Higginson; Mogens Groenvold Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Eva-Maria Gamper; Morten Aa Petersen; Neil Aaronson; Anna Costantini; Johannes M Giesinger; Bernhard Holzner; Georg Kemmler; Anne Oberguggenberger; Susanne Singer; Teresa Young; Mogens Groenvold Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Julio Cabrero-García; Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo; Carmen Luz Muñoz-Mendoza; María José Cabañero-Martínez; Lorena González-Llopis; Abilio Reig-Ferrer Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Eva-Maria Gamper; Mogens Groenvold; Morten Aa Petersen; Teresa Young; Anna Costantini; Neil Aaronson; Johannes M Giesinger; Verena Meraner; Georg Kemmler; Bernhard Holzner Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Morten Aa Petersen; Neil K Aaronson; Wei-Chu Chie; Thierry Conroy; Anna Costantini; Eva Hammerlid; Marianne J Hjermstad; Stein Kaasa; Jon H Loge; Galina Velikova; Teresa Young; Mogens Groenvold Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 4.147