RATIONALE: Recent studies on reinforcer valuation in social situations have informed research on mental illness. Social temporal discounting may be a way to examine effects of social context on the devaluation of delayed reinforcers. In prior research with non-drug-using groups, we demonstrated that individuals discount delayed rewards less rapidly (i.e., value the future more) for a group of which they are a member than they do for themselves alone. OBJECTIVES: The current study examined how cigarette smoking and level of alcohol use relate to rates of delay and social temporal discounting. METHODS: In this study, we used crowd-sourcing technology to contact a large number of individuals (N = 796). Some of these individuals were hazardous-to-harmful drinkers (n = 269), whereas others were non-problem drinkers (n = 523); some were smokers (n = 182), whereas others were nonsmokers (n = 614). Delay discounting questionnaires for individual rewards (me now, me later) and for group rewards (we now, we later; me now, we later) were used to measure individuals' discounting rates across various social contexts. RESULTS: Our analyses found that smokers discounted delayed rewards more rapidly than controls under all conditions. However, hazardous-to-harmful drinkers discounted delayed rewards significantly more rapidly than the non-problem drinkers under the individual condition, but not under the social conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This finding suggests that the use of different abused drugs may be associated with excessive discounting in the individual condition and has selective effects when discounting for a group in the social conditions.
RATIONALE: Recent studies on reinforcer valuation in social situations have informed research on mental illness. Social temporal discounting may be a way to examine effects of social context on the devaluation of delayed reinforcers. In prior research with non-drug-using groups, we demonstrated that individuals discount delayed rewards less rapidly (i.e., value the future more) for a group of which they are a member than they do for themselves alone. OBJECTIVES: The current study examined how cigarette smoking and level of alcohol use relate to rates of delay and social temporal discounting. METHODS: In this study, we used crowd-sourcing technology to contact a large number of individuals (N = 796). Some of these individuals were hazardous-to-harmful drinkers (n = 269), whereas others were non-problem drinkers (n = 523); some were smokers (n = 182), whereas others were nonsmokers (n = 614). Delay discounting questionnaires for individual rewards (me now, me later) and for group rewards (we now, we later; me now, we later) were used to measure individuals' discounting rates across various social contexts. RESULTS: Our analyses found that smokers discounted delayed rewards more rapidly than controls under all conditions. However, hazardous-to-harmful drinkers discounted delayed rewards significantly more rapidly than the non-problem drinkers under the individual condition, but not under the social conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This finding suggests that the use of different abused drugs may be associated with excessive discounting in the individual condition and has selective effects when discounting for a group in the social conditions.
Authors: Yukiko Washio; Stephen T Higgins; Sarah H Heil; Todd L McKerchar; Gary J Badger; Joan M Skelly; Robert L Dantona Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Maggie M Sweitzer; Eric C Donny; Lisa C Dierker; Janine D Flory; Stephen B Manuck Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Warren K Bickel; A George Wilson; Christopher T Franck; E Terry Mueller; David P Jarmolowicz; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Samantha J Fede Journal: Appetite Date: 2013-12-29 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Warren K Bickel; Matthew W Johnson; Mikhail N Koffarnus; James MacKillop; James G Murphy Journal: Annu Rev Clin Psychol Date: 2014 Impact factor: 18.561
Authors: Kristen R Hamilton; Marci R Mitchell; Victoria C Wing; Iris M Balodis; Warren K Bickel; Mark Fillmore; Scott D Lane; C W Lejuez; Andrew K Littlefield; Maartje Luijten; Charles W Mathias; Suzanne H Mitchell; T Celeste Napier; Brady Reynolds; Christian G Schütz; Barry Setlow; Kenneth J Sher; Alan C Swann; Stephanie E Tedford; Melanie J White; Catharine A Winstanley; Richard Yi; Marc N Potenza; F Gerard Moeller Journal: Personal Disord Date: 2015-04
Authors: Christine E Sheffer; James Mackillop; Arislenia Fernandez; Darren Christensen; Warren K Bickel; Matthew W Johnson; Luana Panissidi; Jami Pittman; Christopher T Franck; Jarrett Williams; Merlin Mathew Journal: Behav Processes Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 1.777
Authors: David P Jarmolowicz; Warren K Bickel; Anne E Carter; Christopher T Franck; E Terry Mueller Journal: Behav Processes Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 1.777