BACKGROUND: Research on delay discounting has expanded our understanding of substance dependence in many ways. Recently, orderly discounting of sexual rewards has been demonstrated in both substance-dependent individuals, and healthy controls. Less clear, however, is if rates of sexual discounting are higher than controls in alcohol-dependent-individuals. METHODS: 20 alcohol-dependent individuals and 21 healthy control participants completed two delay-discounting tasks. One task involved monetary rewards, whereas the other involved the discounting of sexual rewards (i.e., number of sex acts). RESULTS: Alcohol dependent individuals discounted sexual rewards at significantly higher rates than did controls. There was a trend toward, but not a similarly significant relation for the discounting of monetary rewards. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of sexual discounting are elevated in alcohol dependent individuals. If this relation is replicated in other at risk populations, the rapid devaluation of sexual rewards may be a laboratory marker of impulsive sexual choices.
BACKGROUND: Research on delay discounting has expanded our understanding of substance dependence in many ways. Recently, orderly discounting of sexual rewards has been demonstrated in both substance-dependent individuals, and healthy controls. Less clear, however, is if rates of sexual discounting are higher than controls in alcohol-dependent-individuals. METHODS: 20 alcohol-dependent individuals and 21 healthy control participants completed two delay-discounting tasks. One task involved monetary rewards, whereas the other involved the discounting of sexual rewards (i.e., number of sex acts). RESULTS:Alcohol dependent individuals discounted sexual rewards at significantly higher rates than did controls. There was a trend toward, but not a similarly significant relation for the discounting of monetary rewards. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of sexual discounting are elevated in alcohol dependent individuals. If this relation is replicated in other at risk populations, the rapid devaluation of sexual rewards may be a laboratory marker of impulsive sexual choices.
Authors: Steven R Lawyer; Sonja A Williams; Tereza Prihodova; Jason D Rollins; Anita C Lester Journal: Behav Processes Date: 2010-04-10 Impact factor: 1.777
Authors: David P Jarmolowicz; Reid D Landes; Darren R Christensen; Bryan A Jones; Lisa Jackson; Richard Yi; Warren K Bickel Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: James MacKillop; Mark A Celio; Nadine R Mastroleo; Christopher W Kahler; Don Operario; Suzanne M Colby; Nancy P Barnett; Peter M Monti Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-03
Authors: Mark A Celio; James MacKillop; Amy J Caswell; Nadine R Mastroleo; Christopher W Kahler; Nancy P Barnett; Suzanne M Colby; Don Operario; Peter M Monti Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Jeb Jones; Jodie L Guest; Patrick S Sullivan; Michael R Kramer; Samuel M Jenness; Jessica M Sales Journal: Sex Health Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: Evan S Herrmann; Dennis J Hand; Matthew W Johnson; Gary J Badger; Sarah H Heil Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 4.492