Literature DB >> 22633365

Biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a European single-centre cohort with a minimum follow-up time of 5 years.

Prasanna Sooriakumaran1, Leif Haendler, Tommy Nyberg, Henrik Gronberg, Andreas Nilsson, Stefan Carlsson, Abolfazl Hosseini, Christofer Adding, Martin Jonsson, Achilles Ploumidis, Lars Egevad, Gunnar Steineck, Peter Wiklund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is an increasingly commonly used surgical treatment option for prostate cancer (PCa); however, its longer-term oncologic results remain uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To report biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) outcomes for men who underwent RARP ≥5 yr ago at a single European centre. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 944 patients underwent RARP as monotherapy for PCa from January 2002 to December 2006 at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Standard clinicopathologic variables were recorded and entered into a secure, ethics-approved database made up of those men with registered domiciles in Stockholm. The median follow-up time was 6.3 yr (interquartile range: 5.6-7.2). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The outcome of this study was biochemical recurrence (BCR), defined as a confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier survival plots with log-rank tests, as well as Cox univariable and multivariable regression analyses, were used to determine BRFS estimates and determine predictors of PSA relapse, respectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The BRFS for the entire cohort at median follow-up was 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.2-87.1); estimates at 5, 7, and 9 yr were 87.1% (95% CI, 84.8-89.2), 84.5% (95% CI, 81.8-86.8), and 82.6% (95% CI, 79.0-85.6), respectively. Nine and 19 patients died of PCa and other causes, respectively, giving end-of-follow-up Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of 98.0% (95% CI, 95.5-99.1) and 94.1% (95% CI, 90.4-96.4), respectively. Preoperative PSA >10, postoperative Gleason sum ≥4 + 3, pathologic T3 disease, positive surgical margin status, and lower surgeon volume were associated with increased risk of BCR on multivariable analysis. This study is limited by a lack of nodal status and tumour volume, which may have confounded our findings.
CONCLUSIONS: This case series from a single, high-volume, European centre demonstrates that RARP has satisfactory medium-term BRFS. Further follow-up is necessary to determine how this finding will translate into cancer-specific and overall survival outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633365     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  30 in total

1.  [Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Organ-confined prostate cancer: are we moving towards more or less radical surgical intervention?

Authors:  Daniel J Stevens; Naomi L Sharma; Ashutosh K Tewari; Roger Kirby; Prasanna Sooriakumaran
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Long-term cancer control outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Baojun Wang; Qing Ai; Yu Zhang; Xiangjun Lv; Hongzhao Li; Xin Ma; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-31

5.  (18)F-choline PET/CT for early detection of metastases in biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Henrik Kjölhede; Göran Ahlgren; Helen Almquist; Fredrik Liedberg; Kerstin Lyttkens; Thomas Ohlsson; Ola Bratt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Nakashima; Rie Inoue; Osamu Komori; Yuri Yamaguchi; Takeshi Kashima; Naoya Satake; Yoshihiro Nakagami; Kazunori Namiki; Toshitaka Nagao; Yoshio Ohno
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; Deepansh Dalela; Akshay Sood; Jesse Sammon; Wooju Jeong; Burkhard Beyer; Nicola Fossati; Craig G Rogers; Mireya Diaz-Insua; James Peabody; Alexander Haese; Francesco Montorsi; Markus Graefen; Alberto Briganti; Mani Menon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Preoperative prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Kunihiko Yoshioka; Tatsuo Gondo; Choichiro Ozu; Yutaka Horiguchi; Kazunori Namiki; Yoshio Ohno; Makoto Ohori; Jun Nakashima; Masaaki Tachibana
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Sey Kiat Lim; Tae-Young Shin; Byung Ha Chung; Sung Joon Hong; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients.

Authors:  A I Tasci; I Tufek; E Gumus; A E Canda; V Tugcu; F Atug; U Boylu; Z Akbulut; S Sahin; A Simsek; A R Kural
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.