Literature DB >> 24048883

Preoperative prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.

Takeshi Hashimoto1, Kunihiko Yoshioka, Tatsuo Gondo, Choichiro Ozu, Yutaka Horiguchi, Kazunori Namiki, Yoshio Ohno, Makoto Ohori, Jun Nakashima, Masaaki Tachibana.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated oncological outcomes in Japanese patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 389 patients who underwent RARP at a single institution with a follow-up period of at least 1 year. Preoperative findings were compared with biochemical recurrence (BCR). Predictors of BCR-free survival (BCRFS) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyses, and a risk stratification model based on the relative risks of BCR was established.
RESULTS: Fifty incidences of BCR were noted during a median follow-up period of 28.7 months (range, 12.1-80.0 months). The BCRFS rate for the entire cohort at the median follow-up time was 85.9 %; the 1-, 3-, and 5-year estimates were 91.0, 85.1, and 81.1 %, respectively. From univariate analyses, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, biopsy Gleason score, and percent positive core were significantly associated with BCR. Multivariate analysis showed that PSA [hazard ratio (HR), 2.75; p = 0.001], percent positive core (HR, 2.22; p = 0.001), and biopsy Gleason score (HR, 2.61; p = 0.007) were independent predictors of BCR.
CONCLUSION: This study at a single Japanese center demonstrates that RARP provides a satisfactory BCRFS rate. This report provides a framework with which to estimate oncological outcomes in patients who underwent RARP for localized prostate cancer. Our results support the increased use of RARP for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in Japan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24048883     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-013-0611-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  23 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  External validation of the UCSF-CAPRA (University of California, San Francisco, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) in Japanese patients receiving radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fumio Ishizaki; Md Aminul Hoque; Tsutomu Nishiyama; Takashi Kawasaki; Takashi Kasahara; Noboru Hara; Itsuhiro Takizawa; Toshihiro Saito; Yasuo Kitamura; Kohei Akazawa; Kota Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Geoffrey Coughlin; Pankaj P Dangle; Kenneth J Palmer; Srinivas Samevedi; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-02-03

Review 4.  Critical review of 'pentafecta' outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin; Oscar Schatloff; Rafael F Coelho; Rair Valero; Young H Ko; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kenneth J Palmer; Sanket Chauhan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Mahendra Bhandari; Nilesh Gupta; Zhaoli Lane; James O Peabody; Craig G Rogers; Jesse Sammon; Sameer A Siddiqui; Mireya Diaz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Elena B Elkin; Lindsay M Jacks; David S Yee; Thomas L Jang; Vincent P Laudone; Bertrand D Guillonneau; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Prostate-specific antigen density predicts adverse pathology and increased risk of biochemical failure.

Authors:  Mohamed H Radwan; Yan Yan; Jason R Luly; Robert S Figenshau; Steven B Brandes; Sam B Bhayani; Arnold D Bullock; Ye Liefu; Gerald L Andriole; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Michael Kerger; Helen Crowe; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Pathological outcome and biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy in African-American, Afro-Caribbean (Jamaican) and Caucasian-American men: an international comparison.

Authors:  Chad R Ritch; Belinda F Morrison; Greg Hruby; Kathleen C Coard; Richard Mayhew; William Aiken; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  2 in total

1.  Robotic Prostatectomy Has a Superior Outcome in Larger Prostates and PSA Density Is a Strong Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  S Bishara; N Vasdev; T Lane; G Boustead; J Adshead
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 2.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seon Heui Lee; Hyun Ju Seo; Na Rae Lee; Soo Kyung Son; Dae Keun Kim; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.