OBJECTIVE: There is increasing emphasis on dimensional conceptualizations of psychopathology, but empirical evidence of their utility is just emerging. In particular, although a range of multidimensional models have been proposed, the relative fit of competing models has rarely been tested. Furthermore, developmental considerations have received scant attention. In this study, we tested a developmentally based, four-dimensional model of disruptive behavior theorized to represent the defining features of disruptive behavior at preschool age: Temper Loss, Noncompliance, Aggression, and Low Concern for Others. METHOD: Model testing was conducted in two independent samples of preschoolers: Clinically Enriched Sample (n = 336) and Epidemiologic Sample (n = 532). The tau-equivalent confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the fit of the Developmental Model relative to three leading competing models (DSM opositional defiant disorder (ODD)/conduct disorder (CD) Model, "Callous" Model, and an "Irritable/Headstrong/Hurtful" Model). Reliability of the four dimensions was also tested. Validity of the dimensions was tested by predicting multi-informant, multi-method ratings of disruptive behavior and impairment, and incremental utility relative to DSM symptoms. RESULTS: In both samples, the Developmental Model demonstrated a superior fit compared with the competing models within the full sample, and across key demographic subgroups. Validity was also demonstrated, including incremental utility relative to DSM-IV disruptive behavior symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Critical next steps for achieving scientific consensus about the optimal dimensional model of disruptive behavior and its clinical application are discussed.
OBJECTIVE: There is increasing emphasis on dimensional conceptualizations of psychopathology, but empirical evidence of their utility is just emerging. In particular, although a range of multidimensional models have been proposed, the relative fit of competing models has rarely been tested. Furthermore, developmental considerations have received scant attention. In this study, we tested a developmentally based, four-dimensional model of disruptive behavior theorized to represent the defining features of disruptive behavior at preschool age: Temper Loss, Noncompliance, Aggression, and Low Concern for Others. METHOD: Model testing was conducted in two independent samples of preschoolers: Clinically Enriched Sample (n = 336) and Epidemiologic Sample (n = 532). The tau-equivalent confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the fit of the Developmental Model relative to three leading competing models (DSM opositional defiant disorder (ODD)/conduct disorder (CD) Model, "Callous" Model, and an "Irritable/Headstrong/Hurtful" Model). Reliability of the four dimensions was also tested. Validity of the dimensions was tested by predicting multi-informant, multi-method ratings of disruptive behavior and impairment, and incremental utility relative to DSM symptoms. RESULTS: In both samples, the Developmental Model demonstrated a superior fit compared with the competing models within the full sample, and across key demographic subgroups. Validity was also demonstrated, including incremental utility relative to DSM-IV disruptive behavior symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Critical next steps for achieving scientific consensus about the optimal dimensional model of disruptive behavior and its clinical application are discussed.
Authors: Amélie Petitclerc; Michel Boivin; Ginette Dionne; Daniel Pérusse; Richard E Tremblay Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2010-09-26 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Ellen Leibenluft; Patricia Cohen; Tristan Gorrindo; Judith S Brook; Daniel S Pine Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Lauren S Wakschlag; Carri Hill; Alice S Carter; Barbara Danis; Helen L Egger; Kate Keenan; Bennett L Leventhal; Domenic Cicchetti; Katie Maskowitz; James Burns; Margaret J Briggs-Gowan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Laura E Quiñones-Camacho; Frank A Fishburn; M Catalina Camacho; Christina O Hlutkowsky; Theodore J Huppert; Lauren S Wakschlag; Susan B Perlman Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Stuart F White; Margaret J Briggs-Gowan; Joel L Voss; Amelie Petitclerc; Kimberly McCarthy; R James R Blair; Lauren S Wakschlag Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2016-04-10 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Adam S Grabell; Yanwei Li; Jeff W Barker; Lauren S Wakschlag; Theodore J Huppert; Susan B Perlman Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2018-01
Authors: Lauren S Wakschlag; Susan B Perlman; R James Blair; Ellen Leibenluft; Margaret J Briggs-Gowan; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Robert R Althoff; Ana V Kuny-Slock; Frank C Verhulst; James J Hudziak; Jan van der Ende Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Ana V Kuny; Robert R Althoff; William Copeland; Meike Bartels; C E M Van Beijsterveldt; Julie Baer; James J Hudziak Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Lauren S Wakschlag; Ryne Estabrook; Amelie Petitclerc; David Henry; James L Burns; Susan B Perlman; Joel L Voss; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Margaret L Briggs-Gowan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 8.829