Literature DB >> 2263201

A prospective toxicity evaluation (COMPACT) on 40 chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program.

D F Lewis1, C Ioannides, D V Parke.   

Abstract

The computer-optimized molecular parametric analysis of chemical toxicity (COMPACT) procedure has been used to determine the molecular conformation and electronic structure of a series of 40 chemicals (out of a total of 44). The procedure can evaluate whether they interact with the active site of cytochrome P450 I or to the binding site of the Ah receptor, and hence to manifest carcinogenicity/toxicity. This is in response to the recent publication by Tennant et al. and their invitation to participate in a prospective identification of potential mutagenicity/carcinogenicity of these 44 chemicals. Correlation of COMPACT with potential genotoxicity was 25/40 (63%); COMPACT also predicted toxicity/carcinogenicity in 10 chemicals (25%) considered to be potentially non-genotoxic (naphthalene, promethazine, resorcinol, p-nitrophenol, tricresyl phosphate, bis(bromoethyl) propanediol, 3,4-dihydrocoumarin, theophylline, triamterene and chloramine), and predicted the absence of toxicity in four chemicals (10%) considered to be potentially genotoxic (methyl bromide, hydrazoic acid, 2,3-dibromo-1-propanol and 1,2,3-trichloropropane).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2263201     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/5.5.433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  7 in total

1.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming.

Authors:  R D King; A Srinivasan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  COMPACT predictions: is there a catch?

Authors:  J K Haseman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  A retrospective evaluation of COMPACT predictions of the outcome of NTP rodent carcinogenicity testing.

Authors:  D F Lewis; C Ioannides; D V Parke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents.

Authors:  J T Wachsman; D W Bristol; J Spalding; M Shelby; R W Tennant
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  The cytochromes P450 and mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  D V Parke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Data selection and treatment of chemicals tested for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.

Authors:  N Loprieno; G Boncristiani; G Loprieno; M Tesoro
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Risk and benefit evaluation in development of pharmaceutical products.

Authors:  C S Aaron; P R Harbach; S S Mattano; J K Mayo; Y Wang; R L Yu; D M Zimmer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.