Literature DB >> 8143634

Risk and benefit evaluation in development of pharmaceutical products.

C S Aaron1, P R Harbach, S S Mattano, J K Mayo, Y Wang, R L Yu, D M Zimmer.   

Abstract

Pharmaceutical products are intended to cure disease, reduce pain and suffering, prolong life, and correct metabolic deficits in patients. However, the potential patient population is intrinsically genetically heterogenous, and this factor complicates the evaluation of data on all aspects of safety evaluation of new drugs. Often the genetic heterogeneity is related to drug metabolizing capacity, but recent evidence suggests that heterogeneity in repair capacity as well as structural integrity of the chromatin (fragile X) have been shown to be relevant. Because drugs are biologically active and may have more than one type of effect, the evaluation of a large number of parameters is necessary in arriving at a rational estimate of potential risk. In this paper, several specific examples of risk assessments and some generic genotoxicity questions that are recurrent, including the question of the relevance of in vitro chromosomal aberration induction at high dose/sampling time, are raised. Other examples of the kinds of concerns from the safety evaluation of U-48753E, U-54461, and U-68,553B are discussed. The drug U-48753E was discovered to be slightly mutagenic in the AS52 assay, and significant efforts were expended in evaluation of the metabolism-based generation of a reactive intermediate. The drug U-54,461 was shown to be capable of breaking chromosomes in vitro but extensive in vivo data as well as a variety of other studies served to reduce the level of concern substantially.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8143634      PMCID: PMC1521120          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101s3291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  20 in total

Review 1.  Role of genotoxicity assays in the regulation of chemicals in The Netherlands: considerations and experiences.

Authors:  P G Kramers; A G Knaap; C A van der Heijden; R D Taalman; G R Mohn
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Development and validation of the spiral Salmonella assay: an automated approach to bacterial mutagenicity testing.

Authors:  V S Houk; S Schalkowsky; L D Claxton
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Comparative mutagenicity testing of bropirimine, 3. Bropirimine does not induce cytogenetic damage in vivo in the rat but does produce micronuclei in the mouse.

Authors:  C S Aaron; T W Petry; D G Branstetter; A J Wickrema-Sinha; R Yu; R Sorg; A Thilagar; P V Kumaroo; J P Sams; B A Thornburg
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  The quality of genotoxicity testing of drugs. Experiences of a regulatory agency with new and old compounds.

Authors:  L Müller; P Kasper; S Madle
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Comparative mutagenicity testing of bropirimine, 1. Induction of chromosome aberrations in CHO cells is not reflected in induction of mutation at the TK locus of L5178Y cells.

Authors:  C S Aaron; T W Petry; A Thilagar; P V Kumaroo; P Kirby
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays.

Authors:  R W Tennant; B H Margolin; M D Shelby; E Zeiger; J K Haseman; J Spalding; W Caspary; M Resnick; S Stasiewicz; B Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. IV. Current methods, estimates of risk of Mendelian disease, human data and lessons from biochemical and molecular studies of mutations.

Authors:  K Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards.

Authors:  B N Ames; R Magaw; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Enumeration of 6-thioguanine-resistant T-lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of nonhuman primates (cynomolgus monkeys).

Authors:  D M Zimmer; C S Aaron; J P O'Neill; R J Albertini
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  DNA sequence analysis of spontaneous and N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-induced hprt mutations arising in vivo in cynomolgus monkey T-lymphocytes.

Authors:  P R Harbach; A L Filipunas; Y Wang; C S Aaron
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.216

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Benefit-risk evaluation: the past, present and future.

Authors:  Juhaeri Juhaeri
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2019-08-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.