Literature DB >> 22625197

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves.

Stefan Toggweiler1, David A Wood1, Josep Rodés-Cabau2, Samir Kapadia3, Alexander B Willson1, Jian Ye1, Anson Cheung1, Jonathon Leipsic1, Ronald K Binder1, Ronen Gurvitch1, Melanie Freeman1, Christopher R Thompson1, Lars G Svensson3, Eric Dumont2, E Murat Tuzcu3, John G Webb4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate outcomes after implantation of a second transcatheter heart valve (THV-in-THV) for acute THV failure.
BACKGROUND: Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be valvular due to prosthetic leaflet dysfunction or paravalvular due to poor annular sealing.
METHODS: Patients undergoing aortic balloon-expandable TAVR at 3 centers were prospectively evaluated at baseline, intraprocedurally, at hospital discharge, and annually.
RESULTS: Of 760 patients undergoing TAVR, 21 (2.8%) received a THV-in-THV implant due to acute, severe regurgitation. Aortic regurgitation was paravalvular in 18 patients and transvalvular in the remaining 3 patients. THV-in-THV implantation was technically successful in 19 patients (90%) and unsuccessful in 2 patients (10%), who subsequently underwent open heart surgery. Mortality at 30 days and 1 year was 14.3% and 24%, respectively. After successful THV-in-THV, mean aortic valve gradient fell from 37 ± 12 mm Hg to 13 ± 5 mm Hg (p < 0.01); aortic valve area increased from 0.64 ± 0.14 cm(2) to 1.55 ± 0.27 cm(2) (p < 0.01); and paravalvular aortic regurgitation was none in 4 patients, mild in 13 patients, and moderate in 2 patients. At 1-year follow-up, 1 patient had moderate and the others had mild or no paravalvular leaks. The mean transvalvular gradient was 15 ± 4 mm Hg, which was higher than in patients undergoing conventional TAVR (11 ± 4 mm Hg, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: THV-in-THV implantation is feasible and results in satisfactory short- and mid-term outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22625197     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  9 in total

Review 1.  Lack of Accessible Data on Prosthetic Heart Valves.

Authors:  Michelle Frank; Giulia Ganzoni; Christoph Starck; Jürg Grünenfelder; Roberto Corti; Christiane Gruner; David Hürlimann; Felix C Tanner; Rolf Jenni; Matthias Greutmann; Patric Biaggi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Dong-Fang Zhao; Nelson Wang; Ya Ruth Huo; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Valve-in-valve implantations: is this the new standard for degenerated bioprostheses? Review of the literature.

Authors:  Krys Milburn; Vinayak Bapat; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  How to Image and Manage Prosthesis-Related Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Nina C Wunderlich; Jörg Honold; Martin J Swaans; Robert J Siegel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Effect of Mechanically Expanded vs Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Mortality and Major Adverse Clinical Events in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ted E Feldman; Michael J Reardon; Vivek Rajagopal; Raj R Makkar; Tanvir K Bajwa; Neal S Kleiman; Axel Linke; Dean J Kereiakes; Ron Waksman; Vinod H Thourani; Robert C Stoler; Gregory J Mishkel; David G Rizik; Vijay S Iyer; Thomas G Gleason; Didier Tchétché; Joshua D Rovin; Maurice Buchbinder; Ian T Meredith; Matthias Götberg; Henrik Bjursten; Christopher Meduri; Michael H Salinger; Dominic J Allocco; Keith D Dawkins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Polymeric trileaflet prosthetic heart valves: evolution and path to clinical reality.

Authors:  Thomas E Claiborne; Marvin J Slepian; Syed Hossainy; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  Early multicenter experience of a new balloon expandable MyVal transcatheter heart valve in dysfunctional stenosed right ventricular outflow tract conduits.

Authors:  Muthukumaran C Sivaprakasam; J Raja Vijendra Reddy; Sengottuvelu Gunasekaran; Kothandam Sivakumar; Sreeja Pavithran; Gopalavilasam Rajagopalan Rohitraj; M Jayranganath; Edwin Francis
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-26

8.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Valve in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Valve for Severe Periprosthetic Regurgitation.

Authors:  Sneha Nandy; Siu-Hin Wan; Kyle Klarich
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2020-01-23

9.  Electrophysiology Testing to Stratify Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Sven Knecht; Beat Schaer; Tobias Reichlin; Florian Spies; Antonio Madaffari; Annina Vischer; Gregor Fahrni; Raban Jeger; Christoph Kaiser; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling; Michael Kühne
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.