Literature DB >> 26645684

Lack of Accessible Data on Prosthetic Heart Valves.

Michelle Frank1, Giulia Ganzoni1, Christoph Starck2,3, Jürg Grünenfelder2,4, Roberto Corti1,4, Christiane Gruner1, David Hürlimann1,4, Felix C Tanner1, Rolf Jenni1, Matthias Greutmann1, Patric Biaggi5,6.   

Abstract

Incomplete information on characteristics of prosthetic heart valves (PHV) may lead to inappropriate choices for PHV implantation (patient-prosthesis-mismatch) or erroneous interpretation of PHV function after implantation. No single and easy accessible source provides all relevant information on PHV. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of available data for the majority of PHVs and annuloplasty rings. Information was collected by reviewing articles published on www.pubmed.org up to December 2014 and by written contact to all PHV manufacturers. Four areas of interest were defined: (1) PHV image, (2) in vivo transvalvular gradients, (3) effective orifice area (EOA) calculators and (4) PHV dimensions. Available information was classified as complete (all categories), partial (two or three categories) or minimal (one category). 108 PHV (including homografts) and 34 annuloplasty rings systems were identified. The information on PHV was complete, partial or minimal in 19.5, 61.0 and 19.5% of PHV, respectively. In 91.6% a picture of the valve could be obtained, whereas normative data for transvalvular gradients and EOA calculators were available in 63.0 and 25.0% of all PHV, respectively. The available data was summarized on a new open access webpage ( www.valveguide.ch ). There is a lack of accessible data on PHV dimensions, normal transvalvular gradients and effective orifice area calculators, although such information is of crucial importance for proper PHV assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Annuloplasty rings; Patient prosthesis mismatch; Prosthetic heart valves; Valve app; Valve repair; Valve replacement; valveguide.ch

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645684     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0805-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  22 in total

Review 1.  The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years.

Authors:  Stuart J Head; Mostafa M Mokhles; Ruben L J Osnabrugge; Philippe Pibarot; Michael J Mack; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Ad J J C Bogers; Arie Pieter Kappetein
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Manufacturer-provided effective orifice area index charts and the prevention of prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  Chad M House; William B Nelson; Timothy J Kroshus; Ranjan Dahiya; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2012-01

3.  Predicting the occurrence of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch: the need for more data.

Authors:  Samuel A Daneshvar; Shahbudin H Rahimtoola
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2012-01

Review 4.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Arturo Evangelista; Brian P Griffin; Bernard Iung; Catherine M Otto; Patricia A Pellikka; Miguel Quiñones
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-12-08

5.  Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  William A Zoghbi; John B Chambers; Jean G Dumesnil; Elyse Foster; John S Gottdiener; Paul A Grayburn; Bijoy K Khandheria; Robert A Levine; Gerald Ross Marx; Fletcher A Miller; Satoshi Nakatani; Miguel A Quiñones; Harry Rakowski; L Leonardo Rodriguez; Madhav Swaminathan; Alan D Waggoner; Neil J Weissman; Miguel Zabalgoitia
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Jose L Zamorano; Luigi P Badano; Charles Bruce; Kwan-Leung Chan; Alexandra Gonçalves; Rebecca T Hahn; Martin G Keane; Giovanni La Canna; Mark J Monaghan; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Frank E Silvestry; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Linda D Gillam
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Hemodynamic performance of small aortic valve bioprostheses: is there a difference?

Authors:  M L McDonald; R C Daly; H V Schaff; C J Mullany; F A Miller; J J Morris; T A Orszulak
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  [Evaluation of new pericardial bioprostheses by pulsed and continuous Doppler ultrasound ].

Authors:  J P Lesbre; C Chassat; J Lespérance; R Petitclerc; R Bonan; I Dyrda; A Pasternac; M Bourassa
Journal:  Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss       Date:  1986-09

9.  Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (VP-PM): a long-term perspective.

Authors:  Samuel A Daneshvar; Shahbudin H Rahimtoola
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Nikos Werner; Jan-Malte Sinning
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.993

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.