Literature DB >> 22622214

How can educators use simulation applications to teach and assess surgical judgment?

Dana K Andersen1.   

Abstract

Surgical simulation applications have been largely limited to the acquisition and assessment of technical skills. Current teaching and assessment of surgical judgment is nonsystematic and prone to error. Interest in methods to enhance the acquisition and assessment of knowledge-based (judgment) skills for intraoperative decision making has led to the application of cognitive task analysis (CTA) and human error assessment to facilitate this process. CTA-based delineation of the steps and hazards of a surgical procedure creates a structured process to teach and assess expert surgical judgment and improves trainees' operative planning, hazard recognition, error prevention, and error recovery when coupled with low-fidelity, synthesized simulation models for open and laparoscopic surgery. Web-based simulation applications facilitate curricular learning (rules-guided skills), allow cognitive rehearsal of procedures, and are accessible independent of location and time. Simulation applications that facilitate the assessment and learning of expert intraoperative judgment should include a consensus-derived outline based on CTA of the operative steps and potential points of risk for each surgical procedure; the ability to detect the situational awareness of the performer and the options considered to avoid error at critical steps; an assessment (scoring) of options considered or attempted; immediate evaluation feedback to inform improved performance; and a program of deliberate practice in which progressively more challenging scenarios can be introduced, based on the trainee's demonstrated skills. High-fidelity simulators currently lack these essential components, and future simulation-assisted teaching and assessment of surgical judgment skills are likely to employ low-fidelity simulators coupled to Web-based instruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22622214     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182583248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  11 in total

1.  A Simulation-based, cognitive assessment of resident decision making during complex urinary catheterization scenarios.

Authors:  Jay N Nathwani; Katherine E Law; Anna K Witt; R D Ray; S M DiMarco; C M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  A serious game can be a valid method to train clinical decision-making in surgery.

Authors:  Maurits Graafland; Maarten F Vollebergh; Sjoerd M Lagarde; M van Haperen; Willem A Bemelman; Marlies P Schijven
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prevention of bile duct injury: the case for incorporating educational theories of expertise.

Authors:  Sophia K McKinley; L Michael Brunt; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Measuring intra-operative decision-making during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: validity evidence for a novel interactive Web-based assessment tool.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Philip H Pucher; Melina C Vassiliou; Rajesh Aggarwal; Gerald M Fried; Elliot J Mitmaker; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Measuring Decision-Making During Thyroidectomy: Validity Evidence for a Web-Based Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Jordan Gornitsky; Yusuke Watanabe; Cassandre Benay; Maria S Altieri; Philip H Pucher; Roger Tabah; Elliot J Mitmaker
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Visual spatial ability for surgical trainees: implications for learning endoscopic, laparoscopic surgery and other image-guided procedures.

Authors:  Patrick Henn; Anthony G Gallagher; Emmeline Nugent; Neal E Seymour; Randy S Haluck; Hazem Hseino; Oscar Traynor; Paul C Neary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Technology-enhanced surgical education: attitudes and perceptions of the endoscopic surgery community in Turkey.

Authors:  Nergiz Ercil Cagiltay; Mustafa Berker
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-11-29

8.  Defining competencies for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  Madoka Takao; Elif Bilgic; Kevin Waschke; Pepa Kaneva; Satoshi Endo; Yoshiko Nakano; Shinwa Tanaka; Yoshinori Morita; Takashi Toyonaga; Eiji Umegaki; Yuzo Kodama; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Education and Training in Transanal Endoscopic Surgery and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; F Borja de Lacy; Roel Hompes
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 10.  Metric-based simulation training to proficiency in medical education:- what it is and how to do it.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.